Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Medical Malpractice Myth Review
A summary of the book
The Medical Malpractice Myth authored by Tom Baker, tackles the complex subject of medical malpractices in an insightful and concise manner. Mr. Baker is an accomplished professor of law who specializes in Insurance and Tort Law. In the first few pages of the book, Mr. Baker, lays out the myth; i.e. that an unprecedented number of people are filing medical malpractice lawsuits and that lawyers and their clients are reaping hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars in unjustified awards, while medical doctors are struggling to pay huge insurance premiums which have already forced some to close their practices (Noah, 2005).
The book is written in eight chapters. In the first chapter, Baker lays out the myth and provides plenty of evidence to its contrary. He then points his readers to the real problem that is facing the health care industry; i.e. not too many lawsuits against physicians but too many instances of medical malpractices. He then explains that the real cost of medical malpractices is not the financial burden on doctors but the number of lost lives, pain, suffering lost wages and productivity and additional medical fees that those who are suing have to bear.
From the second chapter to the seventh one, Baker investigates and elaborates on a number of different aspects about the myth in detail. In the second chapter, he points to the fact that healthcare professionals and the public in general should be more worried with the rising cases of medical malpractice and not the number of lawsuits. In the third chapter, he persuasively contends that the real culprit for high medical malpractices insurance premiums is the insurance sector's management of reserves, profits and losses during different seasons of the underwriting cycle and not the litigations against doctors and hospitals (Baker, 2007). In the fourth chapter, Baker provides evidence against the notion that more and more patients are filing frivolous suits and that an increasing number of judges and juries are awarding them huge amounts of money in damages even in cases where physicians have observed their duty of care. Baker then covers the value...
Lastly, in the final chapter Baker proposes a number of reforms to deal with some of the identified problems in the medical malpractice system of litigation (Noah, 2005).
All the reforms proposed by Baker are evidence-based and are meant to achieve the following goals:
1. Significantly reduce the incidences of medical malpractice
2. Increase awareness in the general public to enable patients to evaluate whether their negative medical outcomes constitute medical malpractices before they file lawsuits.
3. To improve compensation for medical injuries
4. To reform the medical malpractice insurance industry so that the underwriting cycle doesn't exert unnecessary financial pressure on doctors (Baker, 2007).
Baker acknowledges the fact that these reforms are not easy to achieve and that the individuals pushing for them will have to surmount significant challenges to achieve them (Noah, 2005).
The Motive for Writing the Medical Malpractice Myth
Baker (2007), describes his motive for writing the book as an effort to reframe the public discourse on medical malpractice lawsuits. And that by doing so the concerned parties can see the truth and start acting accordingly. According to Coombs, this shows that the targeted readers are politicians and other policymakers who might have accepted the myths and misconceptions that Baker is challenging in his book.
Illumination of One Or More of The Biomedical Ethical Concerns, Explicit or Implied, To Which the Book Gives Useful Insight.
Professor Baker highlights the thinking that there are many cases in which plaintiffs obtain large damages even though the defendants were not negligent; and that such lawsuits have led to: physicians wasting considerable resources on defensive medicine; significant increases in insurance premiums; and excellent physicians losing their jobs or closing their private practices (Coombs). However, according to him this is not true. Baker first highlights the fact that in a report to the congress, the Office of Technology Assessment, said there were no good or bad effects to medical malpractice litigations (Baker, 2007). He also points out that only two studies have somewhat indicated that such lawsuits did not result in improved healthcare outcomes for patients. More multi-ethnic…
References
Noah, B. A. (2005). Book Review: Tom Baker's the Medical Malpractice Myth (Doctoral dissertation, Western New England University).
Coombs, M. (n.d.). THE MEDICAL MALPRACTICE MYTH REVIEW. Retrieved November 16, 2016, from http://faculty.law.miami.edu/mcoombs/documents/Bakerreview.pdf
Baker, T. (2007). The medical malpractice myth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
..bad investment choices, in addition to the underwriting cycle, have led to dwindling profits for insurers, who then try to recoup their losses through over-priced insurance products. Lawyers and consumer groups generally support efforts to reform the insurance industry in order to rein in premiums." (Cohen, 2005) The work of Miller (2003) entitled: "Liability for Medical Malpractice: Issues and Evidence" states that over the past "...several years" witnessed has been an
Medical Malpractice/Frivolous Lawsuits The Effect of Medical Malpractice/Frivolous Lawsuits on Healthcare The costs of medical malpractice insurance are rising yearly. These expenses affect medical practitioners in a number of ways, including such things as from where they choose to practice medicine, to the number of tests and types and medical procedures ordered. Many doctors in various specialties are aware that the laws and regulations that govern malpractice insurance vary from state to
Rising Cost of Medical Malpractice: The Impact of Medical Insurance on Patients and Physicians The purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which rising medical malpractice premiums have affected the quality care provided by physicians. Research suggests that a majority of specialty practitioners are pulling out of practice because of rapidly rising medical insurance premiums. A majority of physicians are unable to pay premiums that are rising upwards
True Cost of Increased Malpractice Insurance in the Health Care Industry During the last decade, medical malpractice premiums have increased exponentially, resulting in a decreased pool of qualified physicians operating in the medical arena. The medical industry is facing many crises, including rapidly increasing health insurance premiums that affect consumers directly. One arena consumers may not have considered evaluating is that of medical malpractice. Medical Malpractice, as defined by the U.S. General
Mitchell. The left arm of the child had to be amputated because of the unsuccessful vascular operation. According to the court session, there was a question to be answered in relation to the agency theory in determining the role of Dr. Williams in this encounter (Tenn Ct App 1970). The article also focuses on reviewing the case of Edmands v. Chamberlain Memorial Hospital in the context of 1978. The case
Some researchers have suggested that increased liability not only encourages physicians to practice defensive medicine, but also undermines many patients access to much needed medical services (Hyman & Silver, 2004). Boulard (2002) cites many studies that clearly show the increasing costs of malpractice insurance affect specialist care. In 2002 alone more than 60 specialists at one critical care facility in Las Vegas left their jobs after another malpractice premium spike. The