Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Winston Churchill today is famous as a leader who refused to advocate what were popular positions at the time. He was an early advocate of refusing to appease Nazi Germany, even when going to war was feared by the vast majority of the British public. Churchill did not believe that compromising with Hitler was a viable option (“Churchill: Leader and Statesman”). In this, he stands in sharp contrast to some of the leadership approaches advocated in the module, which stress the need for effective collaboration to achieve goals. However, during the war, Churchill did show himself to be capable of collaborating with the Allies to orchestrate victory against Nazi Germany.
One reason Churchill may have excelled, while still holding to strong and forceful leadership positions, however, is that he was primarily focused upon task-based conflicts. In other words, he did not engage in conflicts based upon personality. Rather than attacking people as people, he attacked positions, such as appeasement. But he did show the personality of a leader in regards to his subordinates, and was willing to make sacrifices, modeling the types of values he espoused. “He tirelessly travelled to military positions and installations, conducting inspections, boosting morale, and supporting commanders” (“Churchill: Leader and Statesman”). However, in retrospect he might have benefited from being able to engage in more effective collaboration once the war was over. One reason Churchill may not have been able to stay in power, besides the fact that people wanted a new change of leadership in peacetime, is that a strong and uncompromising position in regards to the issue is less viable when debating peacetime issues such as maintaining future peace in Europe. In those instances, listening to subordinates rather than taking absolutist stances may be necessary, versus when engaged in a total war against an outside enemy.
Works Cited
“Churchill: Leader and Statesman.” The International Churchill Society. Web. 8 November 2020. https://winstonchurchill.org/the-life-of-churchill/life/churchill-leader-and-statesman/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://winstonchurchill.org/the-life-of-churchill/life/churchill-leader-and-statesman/
It would help to remember that Churchill was an intense patriot, and he loved his country more than anything else in the world. This individual was also a great believer in the greatness and immensity of his country, and he was constantly aware of the historic role that England had played in Europe, in the Empire, and also in the world in general. Churchill was an individual who thrived
To cover up his serious health problems, the members of Parliament were told that he was suffering from exhaustion, he was 78 years old at the time, and that he needed to take some time off to recover. Things got even more serious with time and old age and two years later, one of the greatest British politicians stepped down from the political scene as a consequence of suffering
Winston Churchill: Leadership and Management Winston Churchill was both a leader and a manager. Leaders are those who have willing followers, while managers are those who have control over others. During his life, Churchill had both of those things. His first bit of fame was gained as a war correspondent, and he later wrote books about the campaigns with which he was involved (Blake, 1997). That was not where Churchill's main
Winston Churchill Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill was one of the most energetic and vital of all British leaders. Born in 1874 to an English father and American mother, he embodied the highest qualities of both peoples. His most obvious qualities were courage and imagination. Less obvious, but no less important to the outcome of his seat of power as the Prime Minister and Minister of Defense for Great Britain during World
The country's warriors are described as "symbolic of initial human strength." Once again the adjective is of importance. The word "initial" signifies the state before disease. Once the disease has its hold, however, all human strength falters and the struggle becomes futile and indeed fatal. Churchill also uses a number of symbolic assertions in association with the disease itself. These include "loathsome hand and poisonous sting" and "poisonous breath and
Churchill was a man of strong beliefs and principles, and he did not use the law to further his own career. Rather, he used it to make England as strong as it could be in order to win the war in Europe. Churchill studied everything, and made the choices he did solely based on winning the war, at any cost. He was an excellent soldier, and understood war tactics. He