Arts Education in Schools: Impact on Learning and Development
This paper examines the consequences of marginalizing arts within school curricula, arguing that arts education plays a meaningful role in student development beyond what standardized testing captures. Drawing on national studies and peer-reviewed research, it reviews how participation in visual and performing arts influences creativity, decision-making, cognitive ability, self-esteem, and social behavior across different age groups — from preschool through secondary school. The paper also critiques the tendency of schools and policymakers to prioritize numeracy and literacy at the expense of creative subjects, and calls attention to the documented benefits of community arts programs for students in under-resourced environments.
- Introduction: The Marginalization of Arts in Schools: Policymakers neglect arts despite evidence of their value
- Why Arts Matter for Child Development: Arts foster creativity, decision-making, and self-expression
- Research Evidence on Arts and Learning Outcomes: National study links arts participation to academic achievement
- Arts Education by Age Group: Age-specific findings on music and cognitive outcomes
- Conclusion: The Case for Restoring Arts in Schools: Cumulative evidence supports arts as essential curriculum
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds its argument in concrete empirical evidence, citing a 10-year national study by Stanford's Shirley Brice Heath and peer-reviewed research from journals such as the Journal of Research in Music Education.
- The paper organizes evidence by age group (preschool, primary, secondary), giving the discussion a clear analytical structure rather than treating students as a monolithic group.
- It acknowledges methodological limitations in the existing research, which adds intellectual honesty and credibility to the overall argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-based advocacy: it presents a position in favor of arts education while transparently noting where the supporting research is weak or inconclusive. This balanced treatment strengthens rather than undermines the argument by showing the writer has engaged critically with the literature rather than selectively citing only favorable findings.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by identifying the problem — policymaker neglect of arts — then builds a developmental case for arts by explaining how creative activities support decision-making and imagination. It follows with a landmark statistical study, then transitions into a review of age-differentiated research findings, and closes by acknowledging the limits of the evidence while affirming its cumulative value. The progression moves logically from problem statement to evidence synthesis.
Introduction: The Marginalization of Arts in Schools
School leaders and policymakers pay little attention to the arts, despite widespread experience showing that allowing young people to participate in arts and culture can tremendously influence their development. The core problem is that very few people bother to research and record the far-reaching effects arts and culture can have on students. Instead, schools, researchers, and policymakers spend the majority of their time focusing on what is easily and commonly measured: reading and math success. This has led arts proponents to try to establish a connection between arts participation and higher reading and math grades — a claim that still lacks robust scholarly and scientific evidence. For other advocates of the arts, there is no need and no practical way to measure the benefits at all (Greene et al., 2014).
In recent years, most attention in education has shifted toward making numeracy and literacy top priorities, with the aim of creating employment opportunities for students and fostering a knowledge economy. With growing concern that more creative subjects are being increasingly sidelined as extracurricular additions — domains in which middle-class participation dominates — arts associations have begun preparing their defenses. Against this backdrop, understanding what arts education genuinely offers students becomes both urgent and necessary.
References
Greene, J. P., Kisida, B., Bogulski, C. A., Kraybill, A., Hitt, C., & Bowen, D. H. (2014, December 2). Arts education matters: We know, we measured it. Education Week.
Hudziak, J., Albaugh, M., Ducharme, S., Karama, S., Spottswood, M., Crehan, E., & Botteron, K. (2014). Cortical thickness maturation and duration of music training: Health-promoting activities shape brain development. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(11), 1153–1161.
Johnson, C., & Memmott, J. (2006). Examination of relationships between participation in school music programs of differing quality and standardized test results. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(4), 293–307.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.