Clash of the Titans (2010): Greek Mythology Film Review
This paper offers a personal critical review of the 2010 film Clash of the Titans, evaluating it against classical Greek mythology as encountered through academic readings, particularly Homer's Iliad. The reviewer examines the film's historical inaccuracies—including the misuse of the Norse-origin Kraken, the misrepresentation of Io, and the substitution of Hades for Poseidon—while also finding value in the film's loose coming-of-age narrative. The paper concludes that the film prioritizes spectacle over substance and fails to meaningfully connect ancient mythology to modern experience, ultimately recommending Homer's Iliad over the film for anyone genuinely interested in Greek mythology.
- Introduction and Film Selection: Why the reviewer chose Clash of the Titans
- Greek Mythology and the Iliad as a Benchmark: Homer's Iliad as the evaluative standard
- Identity Themes and Personal Connection: Coming-of-age element resonates personally
- Mythological Inaccuracies in the Film: Specific errors in characters and plot
- Modern Mythology and the Limits of Spectacle: Technology as modern mythology; film as empty spectacle
- Final Verdict and Recommendation: Film not recommended; Iliad preferred
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The reviewer grounds their critique in a clear personal standard — familiarity with Homer's Iliad — giving the evaluation an identifiable analytical baseline rather than vague impressions.
- Specific mythological errors (e.g., Io's relationship to Perseus, the Norse origin of the Kraken, Poseidon vs. Hades) demonstrate genuine subject-matter engagement and add credibility to the critique.
- The paper honestly acknowledges its own limits, admitting the film's real source is the 1980s version, which shows intellectual fairness and nuance.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses source comparison as its central analytical method — measuring the film against both classical texts and the prior 1981 adaptation. This layered comparison allows the writer to distinguish between two different kinds of deviation (from myth vs. from predecessor film), which is more sophisticated than a simple "accurate vs. inaccurate" binary.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with context for the film selection, then establishes a mythological and literary benchmark through the Iliad. A middle section finds genuine personal resonance in the film's identity theme before pivoting to detailed mythological inaccuracies. The paper closes by connecting the critique to a broader argument about modern mythology and technology, ending with a clear recommendation. The structure moves naturally from personal impression to analytical critique to cultural observation.
Introduction and Film Selection
In selecting a film to review, I wanted one that I had heard of and that I thought might be entertaining to watch. Clash of the Titans sounded fun, so I selected it. The 2010 film is actually a remake of a movie by the same title from the 1980s. That earlier film was loosely based on Greek mythology, and the 2010 film was loosely based on it — so it was really not much of a surprise that the film's characters bore little resemblance to the actual characters from classical mythology. Still, I was a bit disappointed that the writers failed to take even a passing interest in representing the stories of the Titans more accurately. What follows in the film is a very loose re-telling of Greek mythology from filmmakers who seem more interested in finding any excuse to show a man in armor battling various monsters and foes.
Greek Mythology and the Iliad as a Benchmark
My view of mythology is that it is important for explaining a people's history, origins, and worldview. Greek mythology is most significant in the sense that it conveys the idea that the gods are involved in the lives of mortals and that they genuinely care about what happens to human beings. I enjoyed reading about the Trojans and the Greeks in Homer's Iliad and found it to be very human and compelling. It was easy to identify with the characters and their feelings. The wrath of Achilles made total sense, as did the stubbornness of Agamemnon. The nobility of Hector and the humility of Priam — willing to beg Achilles for his son's body back — resonated deeply with me.
Thus, while I did not hold out much hope that Clash of the Titans would reflect many of these human themes, I did want it to have some depth. However, it was all spectacle and special effects, with very little in the way of character development. Perseus should have seemed more likeable, but in the film he does not do much to make one want to identify with him.
Identity Themes and Personal Connection
The film does connect with me on a personal level because it is ultimately about a person figuring out his identity and role in the world. Identity versus role confusion is a major conflict that most people experience as they grow up, and it is often the subject of coming-of-age stories. I was not expecting a coming-of-age tale with this film, but watching it gave me that feeling, and I appreciated that element of it.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.