Ethics and Misconduct in Industrial Hygiene Practice
This paper reviews Burgess and Mullen's (2002) study of ethical misconduct among industrial hygienists in England, which found that 33 of 43 surveyed practitioners had witnessed ethical violations. The paper summarizes the categories of misconduct identified — including data fabrication, plagiarism, and breaches of confidentiality — and compares these findings to the American Board of Industrial Hygienists (ABIH) Code of Ethics. It argues that the prevalence of ethical lapses in the profession underscores the need for stronger ethical training, anonymous reporting mechanisms, and whistleblower protections, and encourages practitioners and students to engage closely with published codes of ethics.
- Introduction and Study Overview: Burgess and Mullen survey of hygienist ethical misconduct
- Categories of Ethical Misconduct: Types of misconduct identified by the survey
- Comparison with the ABIH Code of Ethics: Survey findings compared to ABIH ethical standards
- Implications for Training and Accountability: Need for training, reporting, and whistleblower protections
- Conclusion: Call to engage with professional codes of ethics
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds its analysis in a specific empirical study (Burgess & Mullen, 2002), giving the discussion a concrete evidentiary foundation rather than relying solely on abstract principles.
- It moves logically from summarizing research findings to comparing them against a professional code of ethics, demonstrating critical engagement with both sources.
- It identifies a meaningful gap in the ABIH Code of Ethics — the absence of explicit language about criticizing a colleague's integrity for personal gain — showing evaluative thinking rather than mere description.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates source synthesis: it reads a research article alongside a professional code and evaluates where they align and where they diverge. This comparative approach is a core skill in professional ethics writing, allowing the author to draw practical conclusions about training and accountability rather than simply summarizing one source.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a summary of the Burgess and Mullen study and its key findings, then details the categories of misconduct identified. It next compares those findings to the ABIH Code of Ethics, noting both convergences and gaps. The final sections shift to practical implications — ethical training, reporting mechanisms, and professional culture — before a brief concluding call to action for students and practitioners.
Introduction and Study Overview
One of the most instructive articles on professional ethics in this field is "Observations of Ethical Misconduct Among Industrial Hygienists in England" by Burgess and Mullen (2002). Although a number of codes of ethics have been published for industrial hygienists, surprisingly few articles discuss ethics in the profession directly. In this article, the authors note that "failure to behave ethically might have serious and possibly fatal consequences," highlighting the need for greater discussion of ethics in the field. The authors conducted a survey of 43 industrial hygienists and found that 33 of them had witnessed ethical misconduct — a striking prevalence that warrants serious attention from both practitioners and students of industrial hygiene.
Categories of Ethical Misconduct
The authors provided survey respondents with nine different categories of ethical misconduct, making the definition of the term concrete and measurable. Among the violations found to have occurred were data fabrication, failure to share credit for work, failure to protect confidentiality, criticizing the integrity of another hygienist for personal gain, and plagiarism. Some of these violations could result in direct physical injury to workers, while many others undermine the professional standards that govern how industrial hygienists are expected to conduct themselves on the job.
Comparison with the ABIH Code of Ethics
The authors concluded their study with recommendations for addressing breaches of ethical conduct. Although the research was conducted in England, its findings can be usefully compared with the American Board of Industrial Hygienists (ABIH) Code of Ethics (2007). For example, maintaining confidentiality is one of the explicit standards contained in the ABIH Code, as is the obligation to "recognize and respect the intellectual property rights of others" (ABIH, 2007), which addresses both plagiarism and the proper sharing of professional credit.
The ABIH Code does not, however, include explicit language about criticizing the integrity of another hygienist for personal gain. This means that Burgess and Mullen were, in part, evaluating the ethical performance of practitioners against a standard not formally codified in the profession's governing document — an important distinction when assessing how comprehensively existing codes capture the full range of problematic behaviors observed in practice. Understanding what codes of ethics do and do not cover is itself a critical professional skill.
Conclusion
The article raises important issues with regard to ethical practice in industrial hygiene. The stakes can be fairly high, so it is essential that there is a higher level of ethical training and that there are clear means by which people can be held accountable for unethical behavior. If ethical lapses are as common as Burgess and Mullen (2002) describe, the entire culture of the profession may need to be examined and reformed.
Things may have changed since the article was published, but it remains important for students of industrial hygiene to know where the relevant codes of ethics are located and to understand some of the challenges involved in applying those codes in the field. Reading articles like this provides valuable insight into the role that ethics and codes of ethics play in occupational hygiene practice. Anyone who has not yet reviewed the available codes of ethics in the industry should do so, in order not only to be aware of the violations that can occur but to be equipped to identify them in the field — enabling better opportunities to improve the ethical standards of the profession as a whole.
References
ABIH (2007). American Board of Industrial Hygiene Code of Ethics. American Board of Industrial Hygiene. Retrieved October 23, 2015 from http://www.abih.org/sites/default/files/downloads/ABIHCodeofEthics.pdf
Burgess, G. & Mullen, D. (2002). Observations of ethical misconduct among industrial hygienists in England. AIHA Journal, 63(2002), 151–155.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.