Experiential Learning and the Humanities in Character Education
This paper examines how experiential learning theory—as developed by Dewey, Piaget, Vygotsky, and Kolb—can be applied to humanities education in order to promote character development and virtue in learners. Drawing on research studies and theoretical frameworks, the paper argues that actively engaging with the humanities through drama, Socratic dialogue, critical analysis, and virtual reality simulation deepens learners' understanding of human nature and moral behavior. It reviews empirical studies that test experiential approaches to Shakespeare, philosophy, and literature, and concludes that creative, hands-on engagement with the humanities cultivates the virtues necessary for good citizenship in a globalized world.
- Introduction: Thesis: experiential humanities learning builds virtue
- Experiential Learning Theory: Dewey, Vygotsky, Piaget, and Kolb's frameworks explained
- The Humanities and Character Education: Humanities as foundation for moral and character development
- Application of Experiential Learning in the Humanities: Drama programs, stage production, and VR studies reviewed
- Implications for Educators: Dialogue, drama, and critical analysis as teaching tools
- Conclusion: Synthesis: humanities and experiential learning cultivate virtue
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates multiple theoretical frameworks—Dewey, Vygotsky, Piaget, and Kolb—into a coherent argument rather than treating each in isolation, demonstrating synthesis across the literature.
- It grounds abstract theory in concrete, research-backed examples (stage production, virtual reality, afterschool Shakespeare programs), making the argument practically actionable for educators.
- The use of direct quotations from primary sources (Aristotle, Kolb, Dewey) alongside secondary empirical studies gives the paper both philosophical depth and evidential support.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective literature synthesis: it does not simply summarize sources one after another but instead weaves them into a single, cumulative argument. Each theorist or study is introduced at the moment it best supports the developing claim, and connections between sources—such as how Riddell et al.'s stage-production findings align with both Kolb's experiential cycle and Vygotsky's ZPD—are explicitly drawn, showing the writer understands relationships among ideas rather than treating references as isolated citations.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a theoretical foundation (experiential learning), then narrows to the specific domain (humanities), then addresses purpose (character education and virtue), then reviews empirical applications, then synthesizes implications, and closes with a forward-looking conclusion. This funnel structure—broad theory → specific domain → evidence → implications—is a reliable model for undergraduate argumentative research papers in education.
Introduction
Experiential learning theory is based on the idea that learners acquire knowledge best when they can come to it through personal experience. Many theorists—from Dewey to Piaget to Vygotsky to Kolb—have contributed to this idea over the years, each one adding to its development. This paper examines how experiential learning theory can be applied to the promotion of character education by way of the humanities. Character education is vital to the formation of virtue in learners, which is fundamental to self-actualization and moral development (Gong, 2010; Kristjánsson, 2014; Lickona, 1993). Kohlberg (1963) has stated that moral development is not something that can be "stamped into" a learner but rather is something that must be nurtured in an atmosphere that promotes its cultivation. Having exposure to the humanities is one way for learners to experience such an atmosphere.
However, from the standpoint of experiential learning theory, it is not enough for a learner merely to be exposed to information: the learner must be actively engaged with it so that it becomes part of the learner's personal experience and provides the necessary material for reflection and recollection. This paper proposes that the promotion of character education can be facilitated through the process of experiential learning by having learners actively engage with the humanities—that is, acting out dramas, participating in dialogues, and conducting critical analysis of texts.
Experiential Learning Theory
Dewey (1938) is often considered the seminal author on experiential learning due to his work Experience and Education, in which he argued that knowledge contained in textbooks is "beyond the reach of the experience" that young learners already possess (p. 3). By basing education upon experience, it brings together both mature and immature minds so that there is interaction and engagement, and experience passes from one to the other. Vygotsky argued similarly in his theory of the zone of proximal development (ZPD), wherein it was posited that learners learn best when they can observe others who already possess knowledge or skills and can demonstrate them in action. Young learners watch, imitate, perform, and develop, much as Dewey suggested they should. Piaget also emphasized that learners develop their cognitive abilities by applying their minds to the real world around them. As Gray and Feldman (2004) have shown, the factor of creative play can help to facilitate this process.
Kolb saw experiential learning as a way for learners to experiment with the ideas and knowledge they are taught; as a way for learners to have a direct experience upon which they can reflect and from which they can grow; and as a way for learners to deepen their understanding of acquired knowledge by looking back and turning their experiences into knowledge they can then build upon—that is, scaffolding. Kolb (1984) points out that "learning is the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience" (p. 38). Experience offers the learner a window onto the real world, where knowledge can be seen to have real application. Kolb's process of experiential learning consisted of four stages: concrete learning, wherein the learner is exposed to new information or given a new way to interpret previous experiences; reflective observation, in which the learner applies understanding gained through experience to the new information; abstract conceptualization, in which new ideas are formulated; and finally, active experimentation, wherein the learner applies new understanding to the world around him.
Kolb's theory expands upon the work of Dewey (1938), who stated that "every experience enacted and undergone modifies the one who acts and undergoes, while this modification affects, whether we wish it or not, the quality of subsequent experiences" (p. 35). Dewey (1938) further noted that educators should "utilize the surroundings, physical and social, that exist so as to extract from them all that they have to contribute to building experiences that are worthwhile" (p. 40). This makes it sensible for educators to make use of the humanities, which are abundant and can include plays, films, shows, books, religious works, philosophical texts, and more.
References
Anggraini, H., & Emmanuel, H. S. (2021, April). Early childhood character education during the Covid Pandemic 19. In 2nd Annual Conference on Social Science and Humanities (ANCOSH 2020) (pp. 40–42). Atlantis Press.
Aristotle. (n.d.). Rhetoric (W. R. Roberts, Trans.). The Internet Classics Archive. (Original work published 350 BC).
Beesley, P. (1940). The revival of the humanities in American education. Columbia University Press.
Biesta, G. (2015). Teaching, teacher education, and the humanities: Reconsidering education as a Geisteswissenschaft. Educational Theory, 65(6), 665–679.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.
Gong, Q. (2010). Virtue ethics and modern society—A response to the thesis of the modern predicament of virtue ethics. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 5(2), 255–265.
Gray, P., & Feldman, J. (2004). Playing in the zone of proximal development: Qualities of self-directed age mixing between adolescents and young children at a democratic school. American Journal of Education, 110(2), 108–146.
Hunt Institute. (2011). The English language arts standards: Key changes and their evidence. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDzTOyxRGLI
Kohlberg, L. (1963). The development of children's orientations toward a moral order. Vita Humana, 6, 11–33.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Prentice-Hall.
Kristjánsson, K. (2014). There is something about Aristotle: The pros and cons of Aristotelianism in contemporary moral education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(1), 48–68.
Levy, J., Tanenbaum, K., & Schlieski, T. (2018). Experiential critical thinking: Prototyping a humanities learning module in VR. iLRN 2018 Montana, 247.
Lickona, T. (1993). The return of character education. Educational Leadership, 51(3), 6–11.
Lucas, K., & Radia, P. (2017). Experiential learning in the humanities: From theory to practice in an after-school Shakespeare program and an online journal. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 17(1), 129–138.
Nurazizah, S., & Sutarsih, C. (2018). Implementation character education through school culture. Journal Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 258.
Riddell, J., Murray, S., & Dickson, L. (2021). From Sherbrooke to Stratford and back again: Team teaching and experiential learning through "Shakesperience." Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 20(2), 172–186.
Small, H. (2013). The value of the humanities. Oxford University Press.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.