Family Dysfunction, Poverty, and Sexuality in As I Lay Dying
This paper examines the interconnected sources of family dysfunction in William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying, focusing on the Bundren family's journey to bury their matriarch, Addie, in Jefferson, Mississippi. Through close readings of each character's narrative voice and actions, the paper argues that poverty, failed parenting, sexual transgression, and individual selfishness collectively produce a family incapable of love or solidarity. Anse's economic incompetence and pettiness, Addie's emotional detachment, Cash's silent suffering, Darl's visionary rivalry with Jewel, Dewey Dell's desperate pregnancy, and Vardaman's fragile innocence are each analyzed as symptoms of a deeper familial sickness rooted in social and sexual dysfunction.
- Introduction: Faulkner's novel introduces deeply dysfunctional Bundren family
- Basic Family Structure: Seven Bundrens shaped by patriarchy and absent love
- Basic Plot Structure: Journey to bury Addie reveals each character's flaws
- Analysis of Family Dysfunction: Each member's selfishness and suffering examined in detail
- Social and Sexual Themes: Poverty and sexuality as root causes of dysfunction
- Conclusion: Darl's madness and family's collective moral failure
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It systematically works through each Bundren family member in turn, building a cumulative portrait of dysfunction rather than making sweeping generalizations unsupported by textual evidence.
- It balances close reading of specific passages (with page citations) with broader thematic claims about poverty and sexuality, grounding interpretive arguments in the novel's actual language.
- It uses secondary scholarship (Wadlington, 1992) to anchor the economic reading while maintaining an independent analytical voice.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates character-by-character analytical scaffolding: rather than treating the family as a single unit, it isolates each character's narrative function and behavioral contribution to dysfunction, then synthesizes these into a unified thematic argument. This technique — common in literary analysis of polyphonic novels — is particularly appropriate for Faulkner's multi-narrator structure.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction establishing theme and method, followed by a structural overview of the family and a plot summary to orient the reader. The analytical core then proceeds character by character through the Bundrens, with each character linked back to the central claims about poverty and sexuality. This clear tripartite structure (orientation → plot → analysis) makes complex material accessible and easy to follow.
Introduction
William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying presents the story of the poor and dysfunctional Bundren family in Mississippi as they transport the body of their deceased wife and mother, Addie, from their home to a town a day's ride away for burial. The novel is told through a series of narratives from different characters who take part in the story, including family members and townsfolk. The stream-of-consciousness style of storytelling relays an intriguing blend of honesty, brutality, and strangeness that is characteristic of many of Faulkner's tales of the South. Each chapter presents a piece of a puzzle that must be assembled in the reader's mind in order to produce a clear picture of the action, the characters' motives, and the novel's universal themes.
Once the reading is completed, the picture that emerges is distinctly clear. It is one of a deeply disturbing family dynamic in which every member of the Bundren family perpetuates some particular contribution to an overall family sickness. The reasons for this dysfunction are numerous, but sexuality and poverty are perhaps the most important. These factors affect all of the family members in one way or another, but the children are particularly and negatively affected.
In this paper, the dynamic of the Bundren family's dysfunction will be analyzed in order to show how each person in the family responded to what might be called the life of the family. The characters will be discussed in turn, following a brief plot exposition, and their contributions to the story as narrators and to the action as actors will be summarized in order to show how Faulkner depicted a group of people related not only by familial ties but also by a kind of universal meanness and pettiness that offers little hope for salvation in the midst of their collective struggle. Following this summary, the social and sexual themes in the novel will be discussed in order to show how Faulkner constructed the story as a kind of descent into hell for the deceased woman who, due to her station in life and through the past actions of herself and her family, seems to receive exactly what she has earned. These themes play an important role in driving the family dysfunction.
Basic Family Structure
The Bundren family includes seven people. The mother, Addie, is the deceased who serves as the namesake "I" in the novel's title. The father, Anse, is her lifelong partner, but theirs has been a partnership built on something other than love and trust. Cash is the eldest child, a son known at the novel's opening to be a skilled carpenter. Darl is the second eldest child, also a son, and it is he who seems to be the most articulate and sensitive member of the family. Jewel is the third son — a bastard offspring of Addie and the family's minister — and is considered by most people to be a self-centered hothead. Next in age comes Dewey Dell, the family's only daughter, who is revealed to be pregnant as the novel opens. Finally, there is Vardaman, the baby of the family, an innocent and imaginative child who has not yet reached full maturity.
The basic family structure is a critical element in Faulkner's construction of the story's overall meaning. By developing the story so that the family is dominated — in number, at least — by men, Faulkner suggests a patriarchal ordering of the family. By showing the father to be a manipulative, freeloading, selfish man — described by one townsfolk narrator as "a lazy man, who hates moving" (114) — he suggests that the family's problems are caused largely by the father. Wadlington (1992) argues that this is largely true, as the family's economic problems lie at the center of their trouble, and the master of the house is an economic incompetent. However, as the tale unfolds and the three older brothers display characteristics of sons who were never shown proper love and acceptance by their mother, a psychological interpretation of the novel also becomes possible — one suggesting that the dead woman, having rejected her children and her role as mother, is the true source of the dysfunction.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.