Foxtrot Phone Scandal: Ethics in Public Administration
This case study examines the Foxtrot Phone Scandal at the United States Coast Guard Academy, in which cadets and students exploited a malfunctioning company telephone to place free calls at the organization's expense. Drawing on Cooper's ethical decision-making model, the Corporate Ethical Virtues (CEV) model, and utilitarian theory, the paper identifies the key actors, behavioral and ethical issues, and the values at stake — including honesty, honor, and devotion to duty. The analysis concludes with a recommended course of action: informing the ailing roommate and notifying Foxtrot Company's management, supported by an assessment of the consequences and ethical criteria underlying that decision.
- Introduction and Overview of the Ethical Dilemma: Background on Foxtrot Company and the phone misuse dilemma
- Key Actors, Roles, and Values: Stakeholder table, roles, and institutional values
- Essential and Implied Facts: Known facts, missing information, and implied consequences
- Behavioral and Ethical Issues: Dishonest behaviors and the ethical violations they create
- Ethical Analysis and Recommended Action: Stewardship, CEV model, and the recommended course of action
- Conclusion: Value Terms and Ethical Criteria: Summary of guiding values and supporting ethical frameworks
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Systematically applies Cooper's decision-making model to structure the analysis from problem identification through recommended action, giving the case study a clear logical progression.
- Uses a tabular actor-mapping approach to organize stakeholder relationships, roles, and values before moving into deeper ethical analysis — an effective scaffolding technique for applied ethics work.
- Grounds recommendations in named ethical frameworks (CEV model, utilitarian theory) rather than relying solely on intuition, demonstrating theoretical awareness appropriate for a public administration course.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied ethical reasoning: it moves from factual description to stakeholder analysis to normative judgment in clearly labeled steps. By naming both explicit facts and implied facts separately, the author shows awareness that ethical cases often hinge on unstated assumptions — a sophisticated analytical move that strengthens the credibility of the recommended action.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a structured case-study format with seven distinct sections: a general statement of the dilemma, a key-actors table, a roles and values discussion, essential and missing facts, behavioral and ethical issues, ethical analysis with a recommended action, and a summary of value terms with supporting references. This mirrors professional ethics-review formats used in public administration training contexts.
Introduction and Overview of the Ethical Dilemma
Ethical dilemmas and issues are common across both public and private sectors, arising from the variety of situations that emerge in workplace settings. Addressing these issues is critical to promoting a suitable work environment and healthy interactions among colleagues. Cooper (2012) states that a decision-making model is essential in addressing ethical issues, as it helps move from identifying a problem to developing a course of action to resolve it.
An example of such an ethical dilemma is the Foxtrot Phone Scandal. Foxtrot Company comprises nearly one hundred cadets from all four classes at the United States Coast Guard Academy. The company is one of eight firms that constitute the Corps of Cadets. Cadets in this class are committed to the values of honor and dedication to duty. This case study analyzes the ethical dilemma presented by the scandal and develops an appropriate course of action to address it.
The central scenario involves the misuse of the company's telephone to place free calls for personal benefit. This ethical dilemma arose when changes in the company's area telephone caused it to operate differently, permitting users to place calls without charge.
Key Actors, Roles, and Values
The key actors in this case are classmates, friends, first-year cadets, cadets from other company areas, and members of the upper classes. These actors each play distinct roles in the scenario, as summarized below.
Classmates are fellow students at the academy whose expected values include honesty and incorruptibility. Friends share a personal relationship with the individual at the center of the dilemma and are likewise expected to be honest and incorruptible. First-year cadets and members of the upper classes are students at the academy bound by its honor code, which emphasizes honesty, honor, and devotion to duty. Cadets from other company areas work outside Foxtrot Company but are equally required to uphold honesty, honor, and devotion to duty. The ailing roommate is a fellow student who is expected to share the same ethical commitments.
Classmates, friends, first-year cadets, and members of the upper classes are all students at the United States Coast Guard Academy, required to uphold the values of honor and devotion to duty. Their primary role at the institution is to learn while adhering to the academy's honor code. Cadets from other company areas must be honest and incorruptible in their service, executing their duties with honor and dignity while remaining committed to their responsibilities.
The values surrounding these relationships reflect the general ethical principles and honor code of the academy. The United States Coast Guard Academy honor code emphasizes honor and devotion to duty, to which all students, first-year cadets, and upper-class members are expected to commit. Beyond the academy's honor code, cadets from other company areas are also required to uphold honesty in their work — values considered worthy of their vigilant effort.
Essential and Implied Facts
As evident in the scenario, misuse of Foxtrot Company's telephone to place free calls and for personal benefit is widespread. Students, first-year cadets, members of the upper classes, and cadets from other company areas are all apparently using the telephone to make free "pay" calls in secret. As the name implies, these calls were meant to be paid for rather than free. The situation has been caused by a telephone malfunction that caused it to operate like a typical home phone line. As a result, the key actors are engaging in this practice in a dishonest manner that violates the ethical principles and standards of behavior expected of them by the academy and the company. This situation creates an ethical dilemma: whether to use the phone as others have, inform the ailing roommate, or report the malfunction and misuse to Foxtrot Company's management.
One implied fact is that the company is unaware of the telephone malfunction and does not know that these actors have been capitalizing on it to place free calls. Additionally, the case does not explicitly state whether the company is eventually charged for the calls placed by students, cadets, and members of other company areas — which would imply that these individuals are contributing to significant financial losses for the company. The case also implies that the key actors are behaving dishonestly in a manner that contradicts what is expected of them ethically. Finally, informing the ailing roommate about the free "pay" telephone would itself be tantamount to acting dishonestly in relation to the company's code of ethics, making the individual complicit in promoting an unethical practice that violates the academy's honor code.
Conclusion: Value Terms and Ethical Criteria
Assessment of the ethical dilemma at Foxtrot Company in relation to the phone scandal entailed the use of several guiding value terms. Honesty, honor, and devotion to duty appear throughout the analysis — in the relationship table, in the discussion of roles among key actors, in the values surrounding these relationships, and in the identification of ethical issues. Incorruptibility is likewise identified in the relationship table as a core value expected of all actors. These terms, grounded in the academy's honor code and supported by frameworks such as the CEV model and utilitarian theory, ultimately guided the recommended course of action: transparency with both the roommate and the company's management in service of the greater institutional good.
References
Cooper, T. L. (2012). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
European Ombudsman. (2012, November 15). Ensuring ethics in public administration: The role of the ombudsman. Retrieved June 7, 2020, from https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/speech/en/49379
Kapstein, M. (2015). The battle for business ethics: A struggle theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 144, 343–361.
Ondrova, D. (2017). Challenges of modern public administration and ethical decision-making. RAP, 3, 255–279.
Singh, A. K., & Mishra, N. K. (2018). Ethical theory & business — A study based on utilitarianism and Kantianism. International Journal of Humanities and Social Development Research, 2(1), 97–113.
Stein, C. (2019, January 25). Ethical considerations in public administration. PA Times. Retrieved June 7, 2020, from https://patimes.org/ethical-considerations-in-public-administration/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.