Ethical Leadership Case Study: Mikhail Gorbachev
This paper examines Mikhail Gorbachev's leadership across two distinct political roles — general secretary of the Soviet Union (1985–1991) and its first president (1990–1991) — using transformational, transactional, and contingency leadership frameworks. The paper traces how Gorbachev's early transformational style, characterized by his glasnost and perestroika reform agenda, gave way to harder-line transactional approaches as domestic unrest, pressure from Communist Party hard-liners, and rivalry with Boris Yeltsin intensified. Drawing on contingency theory, the paper evaluates the effectiveness of his behaviors within the context of organizational tasks, follower characteristics, and institutional goals, and concludes with a recommendation that Gorbachev would have been more effective had he maintained his transformational leadership approach throughout his presidency.
- Introduction: Gorbachev's roles, reforms, and paper objectives
- Leadership Theories, Styles, and Power Across Roles: Shift from transformational to transactional leadership
- Contingency Theory Evaluation of Leadership Effectiveness: Contingency theory applied to tasks, followers, and goals
- Western Media Coverage as a Leadership Barometer: Press coverage reflecting changing perceptions of Gorbachev
- Recommendations for More Effective Leadership: Argument for sustaining transformational leadership approach
- Conclusion: Summary of leadership findings and historical legacy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates concrete historical events — Black January, the Lithuania intervention, the failed 1991 coup — directly into its leadership framework analysis, making abstract theory tangible and well-supported.
- The use of a primary source table (representative Western press coverage from 1985 to 1991) provides an original evidentiary layer that supports the argument about Gorbachev's shifting public perception as his leadership style changed.
- The paper balances positive and negative dimensions of Gorbachev's record, acknowledging international acclaim while also surfacing lesser-known actions such as the KGB's continued use and the Vilnius assault, which strengthens analytical credibility.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates sustained application of a named theoretical framework — contingency theory — across multiple leadership roles and time periods. Rather than applying the theory generically, the author maps its three core variables (task context, follower characteristics, organizational goals) onto specific moments in Gorbachev's tenure, showing how environmental turbulence forced leadership style changes. This structured comparison across roles is a hallmark of strong political leadership analysis at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a clear four-part structure: (1) an introduction establishing Gorbachev's roles and the paper's analytical objectives; (2) a chronological leadership analysis tracing style shifts from transformational to transactional; (3) a contingency theory evaluation organized around tasks, followers, and goals; and (4) a recommendations section followed by a brief conclusion. The embedded press-coverage table serves as a mid-paper evidence anchor, reinforcing the argument about perception shift without disrupting the analytical flow.
Introduction
As the eighth and last leader of the former Soviet Union, Nobel Peace Prize laureate (1990), and best-selling author, Mikhail Gorbachev served alternatively as Communist Party general secretary from 1985 through 1991, as chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet and chairman of the Supreme Soviet from 1988 to 1991, and as the first president of the Soviet Union from 1990 to 1991. During this six-year period, Gorbachev's role and leadership behaviors changed dramatically due to external circumstances that threatened the future of his glasnost ("openness") and perestroika ("restructuring") reform policies, as well as the future of the Soviet Union itself.
This paper reviews the relevant literature to describe how and why Gorbachev's leadership theories, styles, and power and influence changed from one role to the next. Drawing on contingency theory, it evaluates the effectiveness of his behaviors in each role within the context of tasks, follower characteristics, and organizational goals. Finally, using specific examples, a recommendation is offered concerning how Gorbachev could have behaved differently within each role to be more effective, followed by a summary of the research and important findings in the conclusion.
References
Arias-King, F. (2005, April 1). Gorbachev steered things in a constructive way. Demokratizatsiya, 13(2), 277–281.
Avni, B. (2014, November 21). Russia worries about actual new Star Wars; the Russians are anxious the U.S. is going to wage war in space. Newsweek, 163(20), 37.
Francis, D. R. (1991, January 18). The fall of the Austrian, Ottoman, and Soviet Empires. The Christian Science Monitor, 8.
Jasper, W. F. (2011, December 5). Going global with "Gorby": Since Mikhail Gorbachev presided over the dismantling of the Soviet Union, he has been lauded as a beacon of freedom, but he wants a worldwide "Soviet" global government. The New American, 27(23), 17–21.
MacKinnon, E. (2008, Spring–Summer). Grasping at the whirlwinds of change: Transitional leadership in comparative perspective — the case studies of Mikhail Gorbachev and F.W. De Klerk. Canadian Journal of History, 43(1), 69–73.
Mikhail Gorbachev. (2017). BBC. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/people/mikhail_gorbachev
Stroilov, P. (2011, May 26). The Gorbachev files. The Spectator, 37.
Swatos, W. H., Jr. (1994). Politics and religion in Central and Eastern Europe: Traditions and transitions. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Trauschweizer, I. (2015, June). The triumph of improvisation: Gorbachev's adaptability, Reagan's engagement, and the end of the Cold War. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 45(2), 419–421.
Valenty, L. O., & Feldman, O. (2002). Political leadership for the new century. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.