Mental Health and Crime: Reforming Criminal Justice
This paper argues that crime in the United States is fundamentally a mental health issue rather than a purely criminal justice issue. Drawing on multiple empirical studies and meta-analyses, the paper documents the disproportionate representation of mentally ill individuals in prisons, the inequality of mental health care within correctional facilities, and the conflict of interest created by the for-profit private prison industry. It examines the cultural, racial, and systemic dimensions of the problem, linking inadequate mental health treatment to ongoing cycles of incarceration. The paper concludes by proposing concrete reforms—including alternative sentencing, abolition of private prisons, and greater collaboration between law enforcement and mental health services—as necessary steps toward a more just and rehabilitative criminal justice system.
- Introduction: Thesis: crime is a mental health issue
- The Mental Health Problem: Mental illness underlies much criminal behavior
- What the Data Shows: Empirical studies confirm mental health overrepresentation
- Addressing the Problem as a Cultural Issue: Race, stigma, and power shape system failures
- Possible Solutions: Alternative sentencing and prison reform proposals
- Conclusion: Reform is urgent; mental health drives crime rates
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It synthesizes multiple peer-reviewed empirical studies and meta-analyses to build a cumulative, evidence-based argument rather than relying on opinion alone.
- It connects individual-level mental health data to systemic structural critiques—linking the for-profit prison industry, racial injustice, and inadequate healthcare into a coherent argument about institutional failure.
- It moves logically from problem identification through cultural analysis to concrete policy solutions, giving the paper a clear and purposeful arc.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of source triangulation: it cites multiple independent studies (Morgan et al., Vogel et al., Yi et al., Semenza & Grosholz) that reach convergent conclusions, then uses that convergence to strengthen the central claim. This technique—showing that different methodologies and data sources point to the same finding—is a hallmark of strong social science argumentation.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that states its thesis explicitly. Two body sections establish the problem empirically and culturally. A focused solutions section translates analysis into actionable policy proposals. The conclusion ties the argument back to contemporary events (COVID-19's mental health impact) to underscore urgency. This problem–evidence–culture–solution–conclusion structure is well-suited to applied social science writing at the undergraduate level.
Introduction
The issue of mental health in the criminal justice system is important because, as Stringer (2019) notes, the U.S. Department of Justice has acknowledged that nearly 40% of individuals in prison have a history of mental illness. Unfortunately, the criminal justice system does not appear to be focused on addressing the situation in a way that benefits people convicted of crime. The prison industry faces a crossroads with respect to the mental health needs of prisoners: it can either continue on its current trajectory, ignoring the obvious mental health needs of inmates, or it can take steps now to address the mental health problem within the criminal justice system. This paper explains why there is a problem and what can be done to address it. It will ultimately argue that the prison industry needs to do a better job of addressing the mental health needs of prisoners, because otherwise there will be no meaningful rehabilitation or reform.
The Mental Health Problem
There are many theories for why crime occurs. From social bond theory to life course theory, criminologists have sought to examine, explore, and understand the factors that cause people to commit crimes. Researchers are now increasingly exploring the role that mental health plays in criminal behavior. Clearly, this is an issue that must be addressed, since nearly half of all people convicted and incarcerated have a history of poor mental health. It makes a certain grim sense that mental health as a social problem goes ignored, because society is conditioned to think of crime in black-and-white terms — as though there were only law-abiding citizens and criminals, with nothing gray about the situation. Yet when one analyzes the situation in greater context, a more complicated picture emerges. People are not always in full control of their own behavior. In many cases, individuals are dealing with mental health problems that lead them into behaviors society condemns and that the criminal justice system says must be punished with incarceration — while the actual root of the problem goes unaddressed.
Criminal justice cannot be effective unless it aligns with social justice, and social justice demands that the mental health issues at the root of crime be confronted. It can be argued that crime in the U.S. is really a mental health issue rather than a purely criminal justice issue, since nearly half of all crimes committed are linked to some form of mental illness experienced by offenders. The situation is made worse by the fact that, according to Yi, Turney, and Wildeman (2016), "jail and prison inmates have different, perhaps unequal, access to on-site physical and mental health services that may mitigate poor mental health outcomes" (p. 905). There is no real equality in terms of who receives mental health care and who does not. Convicts are being incarcerated instead of treated for their mental health issues, and in those places where mental health services are provided, the provisions are incomplete, hasty, and unequally administered. Without a consistent, holistic, and comprehensive approach, the criminal justice system is simply placing a bandage over a serious wound — and society accepts the situation because it does not have to confront the problem directly: those who are mentally ill are imprisoned, some placed in solitary confinement for days, weeks, months, or even years (Haney, 2018).
The social justice principles at stake here include respect for all human persons and the need to address inequality within the criminal justice system. Persons with mental health issues are subjected to marginalization and oppression as they are kept locked within a system that is punitive rather than rehabilitative. From a social justice perspective, prisons are considered a critical instrument of justice. It is, however, important to note that insofar as the health and wellbeing of prisoners is concerned, prisons fail to promote certain societal aspirations. Instead of addressing the mental health dimensions of crime, the system focuses on punitive justice. This is partly because of a conflict of interest at the heart of the criminal justice system: a private prison industry profits from the imprisonment of convicts. The labor of these convicts is outsourced to competing companies, which pay inmates pennies on the dollar — inmates who have no choice but to work for them while incarcerated (Pelaez, 2014). There is no incentive on the part of the state to address the mental health needs of inmates, even though there is a high correlation between crime and poor mental health (Evans Cuellar, McReynolds & Wasserman, 2006).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.