PharmaCARE CSR Ethics: Stakeholders & Corporate Responsibility
This paper examines the corporate social responsibility (CSR) challenges facing PharmaCARE, a fictional pharmaceutical company whose motto, "We CARE about YOUR health," is undermined by its exploitative labor practices in Colberia and its anti-environmental lobbying efforts. The paper identifies key stakeholders, assesses how they are affected by the company's actions, and draws comparisons to Apple's controversial labor practices in China. It then evaluates multiple ethical frameworks — including utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, and the ethics of care — to determine which best supports a credible CSR policy. Three concrete recommendations are proposed, and the paper concludes that placing people before profits is the foundation of sustainable corporate success.
- Introduction: PharmaCARE's CSR Challenge: Overview of PharmaCARE's CSR gap and paper scope
- Stakeholders and Their Interests: Identifies stakeholders and CSR framework definition
- Comparing PharmaCARE to Apple's Labor Practices: Apple's China labor practices compared to PharmaCARE
- Human Rights and Environmental Concerns: Colberian labor exploitation and environmental hypocrisy
- Ethical Frameworks for a Stronger CSR Policy: Utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, and care ethics applied
- Recommendations and Conclusion: Three reforms proposed and ethical conclusions drawn
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper consistently ties abstract ethical frameworks back to concrete company behaviors, making philosophical concepts accessible and practically relevant.
- The Apple comparison is well-chosen: it grounds the analysis in a real-world parallel, lending credibility to claims about PharmaCARE's exploitative practices.
- The three-recommendation structure provides actionable takeaways rather than leaving critique at a purely theoretical level.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative ethical analysis — applying multiple normative frameworks (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, ethics of care) sequentially to the same set of corporate behaviors. This technique allows the writer to show not just that a company acts wrongly, but why different philosophical traditions converge on the same conclusion, strengthening the argument's persuasive force.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a stakeholder overview and CSR definition, moves into the specific labor and environmental failures of PharmaCARE, introduces Apple as a comparative case, proposes three concrete reforms, then works through four ethical frameworks before closing with a personal moral reflection and a forward-looking conclusion. This funnel structure — broad context → specific critique → remedies → philosophical grounding → synthesis — is a strong model for applied ethics essays.
Introduction: PharmaCARE's CSR Challenge
PharmaCARE's motto is "We CARE about YOUR health" — and this assertion should be borne out in the firm's actions and not just in its words. To understand the actual impact of the organization's actions, it is necessary to acknowledge its stakeholders and examine how each is affected. By doing so, a better system of corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be implemented to address the issues that PharmaCARE faces in Colberia. By examining how other firms and multinationals have addressed CSR issues and comparing them to PharmaCARE's situation, a detailed proposition based on an appropriate philosophical and ethical perspective can be generated.
This paper provides an overview of the stakeholders in the firm, how they are impacted by the organization's actions, how the firm can improve ethically and responsibly with regard to its stakeholders, and how PharmaCARE compares to another company facing a similar situation.
Stakeholders and Their Interests
A stakeholder is anyone who is directly or indirectly impacted by the conduct of a company. A stakeholder can be a manager within the firm or a customer of the firm. It can be a political activist who receives donations from the firm and looks after its interests, or a politician who represents a community where the firm does business. Stakeholders are in some way involved in and/or touched by the activities of the company.
The stakeholders in PharmaCARE consist of employees (both Western and Colberian), consumers and clients, and directors, as well as the recipients of its sponsored programs — including PAC fund recipients, scholarship recipients, and environmental lobby groups. The central issue the firm faces is that its commitment to health, as evidenced in its motto and mission, is at odds with its actions in both the environmental and socio-political realms. For example, instead of committing itself to environmental protection, it has lobbied to overturn environmental regulations so that it can avoid being hampered by laws that are detrimental to its profitability. This is an example of a company that puts profits before people, when the core of CSR should be the opposite — because it is people who ultimately underpin the ability to generate profits.
CSR is a way for firms to have a direct effect on the "social, environmental and economic environment in which" the corporation functions (Castka, Bamber, & Sharp, 2005, p. vii). By devising sound CSR policies, companies can demonstrate a genuine commitment to the health of the planet and the cultures and communities with which they interact, working toward a better world for all (Friedman & Miles, 2002). In order to appropriately structure a CSR policy, a firm should establish an adequate ethical foundation for itself — one that serves as a guideline for how the company should address all issues that arise in its line of work (Pearce & Doh, 2005; AnyangoOoko, 2014).
For instance, PharmaCARE expresses its intent to help improve the health of people, yet it opposes legislation designed to protect the environment. These two positions are contradictory: if an environment is negatively impacted, so too will be the people who live within it. PharmaCARE's outlook is therefore not currently guided by an ethical framework that allows it to apply a consistent and principled formula to every situation. In order to succeed in the long term, it needs to develop exactly that.
Another issue the firm faces is its use of labor in Africa — specifically, the exploitation of workers in Colberia, who are employed for slave wages ($1 per day) and required to perform heavy manual labor over long distances. This is not a caring practice and does not reflect genuine concern for the company's workforce in that country. Western employees, by contrast, enjoy lavish accommodations, including swimming pools, comfortable rest areas, and living quarters that are starkly different from those of the average Colberian worker. A system of deep inequality is thus evident within the firm and its operations.
Comparing PharmaCARE to Apple's Labor Practices
Apple is one example of a multinational company that has taken its business to other countries in order to profit from low-cost labor. Apple has used Chinese labor, paying comparable rates, and has also confronted the controversial issue of worker suicide by installing safety nets outside its factories to prevent workers from jumping from windows or rooftops (Cooper, 2013). Apple's "sweatshop" factories, as described by Cooper (2013), indicate that the company is not dedicated to human rights and equality in a manner consistent with sound CSR principles.
Apple CEO Tim Cook has denied that the company exploits Chinese labor to boost profits, arguing instead that the skill level of Chinese workers far exceeds that available elsewhere in the world, and that this — not cost savings — is the reason the company manufactures in China (Sharwood, 2015; Langlois, 2015). Despite Cook's attempt to present a clean face on the company's activities in China, Apple faces serious human rights allegations and should adopt a CSR policy more strategically aligned with the values of modern society.
References
AnyangoOoko, G. (2014). The environmental factors that influence implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an organization. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(12), 95–102.
Castka, P., Bamber, C., & Sharp, J. (2005). Implementing effective corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: A framework. British Standards Institution.
Cooper, R. (2013). Inside Apple's Chinese 'sweatshop' factory where workers are paid just £1.12 per hour to produce iPhones and iPads for the West. Daily Mail. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2103798/Revealed-Inside-Apples-Chinese-sweatshop-factory-workers-paid-just-1-12-hour.html
Friedman, A., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21.
Langlois, S. (2015). Tim Cook says this is the real reason Apple products are made in China. MarketWatch. Retrieved from http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tim-cook-apple-doesnt-make-its-products-in-china-because-its-cheaper-2015-12-20
Pearce, J., & Doh, J. (2005). The high impact of collaborative social initiatives. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 30–38.
Sharwood, S. (2015). Skilled workers, not cost, lured Apple to China says Tim Cook. The Register. Retrieved from http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12/21/apple_60_minutes_interview/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.