PTSD and Psychological Distress After Natural Disasters
This paper presents a literature review of psychological distress and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) arising from major natural disasters around the world. Drawing on peer-reviewed research, the paper examines PTSD outcomes following the 2000 Hat Yai flood in Thailand, the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan, flooding events in England and China, the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, and the 2011 Japanese earthquake and tsunami. Key topics include validated screening instruments, demographic risk factors such as gender and education level, the distinction between PTSD symptoms and full diagnostic criteria, somatic symptom overlap, and intervention strategies such as yoga breathing therapy. The review underscores the importance of timely mental health services following catastrophic natural events.
- Introduction: PTSD as a major consequence of natural disasters
- Hat Yai Flood, Thailand (2000): GHQ and IES results after Thai flooding
- Chi-Chi Earthquake Survivors in Taiwan: Three-year PTSD follow-up after Taiwan earthquake
- Floods and PTSD: England and China: PTSD findings from Mississippi, English, and Chinese floods
- Asian Tsunami, 2004: PTSD in tourists, adolescents, and locals after tsunami
- Somatic Symptoms and Depression: Physical and psychological pain overlap in disaster survivors
- The 2011 Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami: Cortisol levels and stress measures after Japan earthquake
- Conclusion: Need for ongoing PTSD therapies after natural disasters
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper synthesizes a wide range of peer-reviewed studies across diverse geographic and cultural contexts, demonstrating breadth of evidence for its central claim about PTSD following natural disasters.
- It consistently identifies the specific screening instruments used in each study (GHQ, IES-R, DRPST, PCL-17, etc.), giving readers a clear sense of how PTSD is measured across different research contexts.
- The paper faithfully reports quantitative findings — percentages, sample sizes, and follow-up intervals — lending empirical credibility to each section.
- A recurring thread noting that women are consistently more susceptible to PTSD than men across all disaster types adds analytical coherence to an otherwise survey-style review.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates the literature review as a synthesizing tool: rather than presenting original data, it draws on multiple independent studies to identify common patterns — such as gender as a risk factor and severity of loss as a predictor of PTSD — that no single study could establish alone. This cross-study synthesis is the defining skill of a well-executed literature review.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized by disaster event, with each major section devoted to a different catastrophe (Thailand flood, Taiwan earthquake, English and Chinese floods, Asian tsunami, Japanese earthquake). Within each section, individual studies are summarized in sequence. A standalone section addresses somatic symptoms and depression as a conceptual bridge. The conclusion draws together the recurring findings about identification and treatment needs.
Introduction
Among the many problems that humans encounter following a natural disaster is Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). PTSD can result from natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, and tornadoes — frightening natural events that cause damage, serious injuries, and loss of life. When humans are exposed to horrific natural disasters, they may continue to carry those fearful events in their memories; those vivid recollections can haunt the individual to the point of causing serious psychological disorders. PTSD can therefore become a very serious emotional problem that requires psychological help from professionals. This paper provides instances of PTSD research following natural disasters and examines studies that delve into the dynamics of PTSD resulting from such events, including the catastrophic flooding in Thailand in 2000.
Hat Yai Flood, Thailand (2000)
When severe rains caused a dangerous flood that killed approximately 32 people in Thailand in November 2000 (the Hat Yai flood), around 1,700 people were injured. There was certainly tremendous damage to property as well, but the focus of an article in the peer-reviewed journal Stress and Health is on the psychological problems that had a serious impact on citizens. According to the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) administered to survivors of the flood, and the Impact of Event Scale (IES) also given to survivors, about 40% of the 590 respondents who completed the GHQ showed mental health issues associated with the flood (Assanangkornchai, 2004, p. 81).
These tests were given to Thai citizens ten weeks after the catastrophe, and it was determined that the health problems faced by these individuals included sleep disturbances and fear. Some people were terrified during the flood because they were not certain when the waters would subside (Assanangkornchai, p. 83). As to the results of the psychological testing, those individuals who had a positive GHQ score had a significantly higher mean IES score than those who did not score significantly on the IES (Assanangkornchai, p. 85). What the authors conclude in the discussion portion of the article is that respondents who believed their "personal loss" was "severe" — or who knew someone who had lost important personal possessions — were far more likely to score high on the GHQ and to also have higher IES scores (Assanangkornchai, p. 88).
Other studies following natural disasters show the same thing that the authors discovered in this research: the severity of loss is among the most important variables determining whether a victim is actually suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. Six months after Hurricane Mitch struck Nicaragua, people suffered PTSD. This pattern of stress following natural disasters in various parts of the world is very serious, and it underscores the need for mental health services to be available for people in the aftermath of major natural disasters.
Chi-Chi Earthquake Survivors in Taiwan
The peer-reviewed journal Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences published an article reflecting a study of PTSD among earthquake survivors in Taiwan, conducted three years after the quake. The original research had been carried out six months after the massive 7.3-magnitude earthquake. In that initial study, it was determined that 418 of 1,756 survivors were suffering from PTSD. Three years later, the research shows that 38 of those 418 PTSD sufferers (9.1%) were still showing strong signs of PTSD (Su, 2010, p. 239). Of the original 1,338 survivors diagnosed as not having PTSD symptoms, 40 individuals were subsequently diagnosed with PTSD three years later (Su, p. 239).
The authors point out that using DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, there are three "core psychopathologies" associated with PTSD. People tend to "re-experience" the frightening event; individuals experience a kind of numbness and "avoidance"; and "hyperarousal" is the third component (any event that reminds the person of the traumatic experience arouses new fear) (Su, p. 239). The screening was conducted using the Disaster-related Psychological Screening Test (DRPST), which consisted of a list of questionnaires created by five psychiatrists and two public health officials (Su, p. 241).
Eight "putative risk factors" were built into the screening to help evaluate the reasons for PTSD diagnoses: (a) household destruction; (b) being physically injured during the earthquake; (c) the loss of or serious injury to a family member; (d) the emotional issues linked to a family member's death; (e) a dramatic decrease in socially related activities; (f) loss of a job because of the quake; (g) significant financial losses; and (h) impairment of memory and attention span (Su, p. 241). These eight putative factors were considered by the researchers to be more than mere predictors of PTSD; they were pivotal in determining "unresolved and delayed PTSD" in the group of 1,756 survivors (Su, p. 242).
Because nearly 27% of the survivors had less than a primary school education, those agreeing to be interviewed six months and three years after the event needed assistance in completing the questionnaire, and translators were on hand. The bottom line for Su and colleagues — based on their findings three years after the fact — is that when people are exposed to a massive earthquake, clinical evaluation should include checking for PTSD symptoms and using the putative risk factors as a diagnostic guide (Su, p. 244). For many of those survivors originally evaluated, early mental health intervention may have prevented the continuing presence of PTSD. When PTSD is not resolved meaningfully at the outset, continuing pain — both physical and psychological — can result, causing social and personal impairment (Su, p. 245).
Conclusion
The overriding theme across the scholarly research articles presented in this paper is that PTSD does indeed result from horrific natural disasters, and that a number of effective strategies exist for identifying PTSD symptoms. However, therapies and solutions still need to be developed and refined to help PTSD sufferers live normal lives. Identifying psychological distress symptoms is only part of the solution; significant challenges remain for psychologists and other healthcare professionals. Because natural disasters will continue to occur, being prepared to assist victims — mentally, physically, and institutionally — is vitally important.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.