Socioeconomic Inequality and Access to Health Care
This paper examines the relationship between socioeconomic status and access to quality health care in the United States. Using conflict theory — rooted in Marxist principles and elaborated by thinkers such as Ralf Dahrendorf and the Frankfurt School — the paper argues that limited health care access for low-income populations is a product of systemic, class-based inequality rather than incidental policy failure. Evidence from the CDC and other sources illustrates persistent gaps in care, including high rates of uninsured individuals and limited primary care availability. The paper proposes two solutions: expanding the independent practice authority of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to increase care availability, and building community-based coalitions to challenge structural and cultural forces that perpetuate socioeconomic oppression.
- Introduction: Socioeconomic Status and Health Care Access: Frames the link between income and care access
- Conflict Theory and Its Sociological Foundations: Origins of conflict theory from Marx to Dahrendorf
- How Conflict Theory Explains Health Care Inequality: Theory applied to systemic care access failures
- APRNs as a Practical Solution to Care Gaps: Expanding nurse practitioner independence to widen access
- Systemic and Cultural Barriers to Equality: Media, Big Pharma, and cultural forces sustaining inequality
- Conclusion: Summary of practical and idealistic reform strategies
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly applies a named sociological framework — conflict theory — to a concrete policy problem, giving the argument theoretical grounding rather than relying solely on anecdote or statistics.
- Moves logically from theory to evidence to solutions, making the paper's structure easy to follow and evaluate.
- Balances a practical, policy-level recommendation (APRN scope expansion) with a broader systemic critique, demonstrating awareness of both short-term and long-term change strategies.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies theory-driven analysis: rather than simply describing a problem with statistics, the author selects a sociological framework and uses it as a lens to interpret why the problem exists and persists. This technique — choosing a theory, explaining its origins, and then applying it to real-world data — is a core skill in social science writing at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a statement of purpose and context, followed by an explanation of conflict theory's intellectual history (from Marx through Dahrendorf and the Frankfurt School). It then applies that theory to health care access disparities, supported by CDC data and examples. Two solutions are proposed — one practical (APRN independence) and one idealistic (cultural and political mobilization) — before a brief conclusion synthesizes both recommendations.
Introduction: Socioeconomic Status and Health Care Access
Research consistently shows that a person's socioeconomic status is a strong predictor of their access to quality health care: those with a low socioeconomic status are far less likely to receive quality care than those with a higher one (Nicks, 2012). As the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP, 2017) has shown, access to quality health care services is critical for sustaining and promoting health in communities — especially those that suffer from low socioeconomic status. By improving access to care in these communities, health care providers can work to prevent the spread of disease, eliminate unnecessary disabilities, and reduce preventable deaths among low-income populations.
Though insurance coverage has been expanded in recent years under the Affordable Care Act (Somanader, 2016), access to health services remains an issue that prevents patients from obtaining the quality care they need. This paper applies conflict theory to explain why access to care is still a problem for people from low socioeconomic backgrounds, and it proposes two recommended solutions that can be implemented to help address this issue.
Conflict Theory and Its Sociological Foundations
Conflict theory is based on Marxist principles developed in the 19th century, which focused on class issues and the inequalities observed between the working class and the owners of the means of production. In the following century, these principles were elaborated upon and conflict theory emerged — mainly in response to another sociological theory that had developed by that time: structural functionalism (Ritzer & Stepnisky, 2017).
Structural functionalism was developed to describe the way that societies and institutions work to achieve a stable and functioning environment. It suggested that society tends to work toward balance within communities so that they function optimally. Conflict theory reversed this idea. Promulgated by thinkers such as Ralf Dahrendorf, it emerged as a more explanatory account of why societies so often fail to achieve satisfactory objectives regarding functionality, equality, and stability. Dahrendorf showed that societies often have "two faces" representing two opposing aims — one meant to help the whole, and one meant to help those already in control who simply want to maintain their position of power (Ritzer & Stepnisky, 2017, p. 120).
The Frankfurt School philosophers — including Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno — argued that society had failed to produce a class uprising that would allow the lower working class to assume more power in the means of production because of a cultural war being waged against them. This cultural war, they posited, was conducted through popular media — mainstream songs, movies, and books — all of which had a pacifying effect on the lower classes, causing them to accept their menial jobs, low income, and low socioeconomic status (Horkheimer & Adorno, 1944).
How Conflict Theory Explains Health Care Inequality
The central tenet of conflict theory is that all parts and classes of society are battling for control, but that those who own the means of production inevitably prevail because they hold the most power. This is why government, schools, corporations, and lobbyists can all function as tools of the ruling class — and why those from low socioeconomic backgrounds struggle to achieve equality. Applied to health care, conflict theory suggests that the limited access to care available to low-income populations is not accidental but is a product of deliberate systemic arrangements that serve the interests of the ruling class.
Evidence supports this view. Despite legislation such as the Affordable Care Act, people of low socioeconomic status continue to face significant barriers to health care. The CDC (2016) reports that from 2014 to 2015, 17.3% of people between the ages of 18 and 64 had no usual source of care. This percentage increased as the age of the population decreased, indicating that children from low-income households are among the most affected: more than 10% of them had no health care visits to an office or clinic during that same period (CDC, 2016).
Another dimension of the problem is geographic: in some parts of the country, there are simply not enough physicians to serve the existing patient population. People from low socioeconomic backgrounds who cannot see a doctor may attempt to treat themselves, and many become dependent on drugs purchased outside the formal health care system — a pattern that only deepens their vulnerability (Szabo, 2014).
Conclusion
The two solutions proposed here are both practical and idealistic — but both must be pursued to meaningfully address the problem of inadequate health care access for people from low socioeconomic backgrounds. The first solution is practical: APRNs must be empowered to expand their independent practice in communities so that more people have viable options for receiving care. The second solution is more structural and will require a coordinated effort among diverse groups willing to join together in challenging the systemic and cultural forces that keep low-income populations in a state of economic and social disadvantage. Dismantling these barriers — through policy advocacy, cultural critique, and community organizing — is essential for achieving genuine health equity.
References
CDC. (2016). Health United States report. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus16.pdf#062
Goldhill, D. (2009). How American health care killed my father. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/09/how-american-health-care-killed-my-father/307617/
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1944). The culture industry. UK: Routledge.
IOM. (2012). The future of nursing. Retrieved from http://nacns.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/5-IOM-Report.pdf
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. (2002). Report to Congress: Medicare payment to advanced practice nurses and physician assistants. Washington, DC.
Nicks, P. (2012). Waiting for health care. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/21/opinion/for-the-uninsured-the-wait-for-health-care.html
O'Brien, J. (2003). How nurse practitioners obtained provider status: Lessons for pharmacists. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 60(22), 45–57.
ODPHP. (2017). Access to health services. Retrieved from
Ritzer, G., & Stepnisky, J. (2017). Modern sociological theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Somanader, T. (2016). A look at six years of the Affordable Care Act. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/03/23/look-six-years-affordable-care-act
Szabo, L. (2014). Cost of not caring: Nowhere to go. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/05/12/mental-health-system-crisis/7746535/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.