Special Education for Diverse Learners: A Chicago Charter School
This paper examines special education services and diverse learner support at a college preparatory charter school on Chicago's Southside. It profiles the school's demographics — including high rates of poverty, homelessness, and learning disabilities — and details the full continuum of placement options and related services available to students with disabilities. The paper analyzes research-based literacy and numeracy curricula, including task-based learning and computer-assisted instruction, alongside three evidence-based instructional strategies. It also explores the principal's leadership style, which centers on collective efficacy and collaborative delegation. The paper concludes with a reflection on what makes the school's model effective and what leadership changes could better close the achievement gap between students with and without disabilities.
- Demographic Overview: School demographics, poverty rates, and proficiency data
- Programs and Services for Students with Disabilities: Placement options, related services, and available resources
- Curriculum and Instruction: Research-based literacy, numeracy, and IEP strategies
- Role of the Principal: Principal's leadership style and collective efficacy approach
- Reflection and Recommendations: Lessons learned and leadership recommendations for closing achievement gap
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds each section in concrete, school-specific data — enrollment percentages, proficiency scores, and growth targets — giving the analysis credibility and specificity rather than relying on generalizations.
- Curriculum and instructional strategy claims are consistently tied to named peer-reviewed sources, demonstrating an academic habit of evidence-linking that strengthens the paper's authority.
- The reflection section moves beyond description to honest critique, identifying a real structural leadership challenge (role clarity) while acknowledging what the school is already doing well (low teacher turnover).
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses a case-study structure in which each section builds on the previous one — demographics inform program needs, programs inform curriculum choices, and curriculum choices inform the principal's leadership approach. This layered, cumulative logic shows how good academic writing builds an argument across multiple sections rather than treating each section as isolated.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into five substantive sections following the abstract. It opens with demographic data to establish context, moves through program options and curriculum strategies at increasing levels of specificity, then shifts to qualitative analysis of principal leadership. The final section functions as a reflective conclusion, balancing praise for current practice against a candid recommendation — a structure well suited to applied education writing at the graduate level.
Demographic Overview
This college preparatory charter school is located on the Southside of Chicago. Its student body is 95% African American and 4% Hispanic, and it serves as a school for social justice and the arts (School Performance, 2017). The socioeconomic background of the vast majority of students' families is challenged: 98% of students receive free or reduced-rate lunches. Approximately one in six students — roughly 100 out of 600 — has a disability. Data obtained from the Illinois Network of Charter Schools (School Performance, 2017) indicate that 94.5% of students come from low-income families, 16% have learning disabilities, 20.2% were homeless, and 1.5% have limited English proficiency.
70% of staff are people of color and 50% are Black male teachers. These percentages reflect the school's effort to reach students in the community by employing teachers who are representative of students' own backgrounds and whom students can relate to.
Only 6% of students are taking early college coursework in grades 10 through 12 (Illinois at a Glance Report Card, 2019). Students have 7% ELA proficiency, 11% math proficiency, and 2% science proficiency (Illinois at a Glance Report Card, 2019). This data shapes instructional planning, as the school focuses on boosting SAT scores. For the past three years, most students have been partially meeting or approaching state-mandated goals on the PSAT in both Math and English Language Arts. The primary problem area is math: the school has set an instructional goal of improving students' math scores, and 9th-grade math students have carried a growth target of 60 points from the Pre-PSAT to the Mid-PSAT. For the past three years, 9th-grade math students have not met that growth goal, and instruction is currently being retooled to address this area.
Programs and Services for Students with Disabilities
The full range of programs, related services, and resources available for addressing the educational needs of students with disabilities includes a continuum of placement options, ranked from least restrictive to most restrictive:
Honor — No extra support is provided; the student engages in self-directed learning to some extent.
General Education — No extra support; the student is guided by the classroom teacher.
Co-Taught — A special education teacher and a general education teacher collaborate to provide assistance to the student.
Instructional Setting / Self-Contained — A special education teacher and a paraprofessional collaborate.
Functional (most intensive) — A special education teacher and two paraprofessionals collaborate.
Related service options include a speech-language pathologist to support students with communication challenges, occupational therapy to help students with motor skills, a social worker to assist students and their families, a school nurse to address health issues, and a school psychologist to support students' mental health needs.
Resources for delivering special education services include specialized staff, dedicated special education classrooms, specialized learning and physical exercise equipment, and parent education programs that focus on professional development activities parents can pursue to better support their children.
References
Baker, S. K., Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Apichatabutra, C., & Doabler, C. (2009). Teaching writing to at-risk students: The quality of evidence for self-regulated strategy development. Exceptional Children, 75, 303–320.
Browder, D., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Spooner, F., Mims, P. J., & Baker, J. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.
Donohoo, J., Hattie, J., & Eells, R. (2018). The power of collective efficacy. Educational Leadership, 75(6), 40–44.
Illinois at a Glance Report Card. (2019). Noble Butler College Prep. Retrieved from
The Japanese Association for Language Teaching. (2005). Vocabulary [Special issue]. The Language Teacher, 29(7). [PDF]
Jitendra, A. K., Burgess, C., & Gajria, M. (2011). Cognitive strategy instruction for improving expository text comprehension of students with learning disabilities: The quality of evidence. Exceptional Children, 77, 135–159.
Mautone, J. A., DuPaul, G. J., & Jitendra, A. K. (2005). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance and classroom behavior of children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9(1), 301–312.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/
School Performance. (2017). Illinois Network of Charter Schools. Retrieved from
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.