Deborah Tannen's Critique of Agonism in Academia
This paper analyzes Deborah Tannen's article published in the Chronicle of Higher Education, in which she critiques the culture of agonism — the reflexive, combative approach to engaging with ideas — and its negative effects on academic life. The analysis examines Tannen's intended audience, her central argument, and the rhetorical strategies she employs, including metaphors, analogies, expert quotations, and autobiographical examples. The paper also traces the connection between Tannen's article and her earlier book, The Argument Culture, and evaluates how effectively her evidence supports the case for replacing agonistic discourse with more constructive intellectual engagement.
- Introduction: Tannen's article and its central claim
- Audience and Purpose: Who Tannen addresses and why
- Connection to The Argument Culture: Article's roots in Tannen's earlier book
- Rhetorical Strategies and Metaphors: Battle, construction, and bread-dough metaphors
- Use of Expert Testimony and Real-Life Examples: Tompkins, Daly, and personal anecdotes
- Conclusion: Overall effectiveness of Tannen's argument
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper stays closely anchored to the source text, systematically unpacking Tannen's rhetorical moves rather than drifting into general commentary on agonism.
- It correctly identifies the layered nature of Tannen's persuasive strategy — metaphor, analogy, expert testimony, and personal anecdote — and treats each as a distinct analytical unit.
- The connection drawn between the article and Tannen's book The Argument Culture demonstrates awareness of authorial context and adds depth to the credibility assessment.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models rhetorical analysis: it moves beyond paraphrasing the source's content to explaining how specific devices (the battle metaphor, the bread-dough analogy, the autobiographical reading-group example) function to advance Tannen's argument. This technique — naming the device, quoting or describing it, and then explaining its persuasive effect — is a core skill in undergraduate composition and communications courses.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by situating Tannen's article within the Chronicle of Higher Education and stating its central claim. It then identifies the intended audience and the author's probable motivation before tracing the article's relationship to The Argument Culture. The bulk of the analysis covers Tannen's rhetorical tools — metaphors of battle, gunfire, and construction; Kerry Daly's bread-dough analogy; Jane Tompkins' confession; and the autobiographical reading-group episode — before a brief conclusion assesses the overall persuasive success of the piece.
Introduction
Writing in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Deborah Tannen successfully decries the quietly damaging impact that agonism has on society at large, with special emphasis on its presence in the educational environment.
Audience and Purpose
The audience of Tannen's article appears to be the entirety of the academic world — faculty and students alike. Both groups would be interested in the information conveyed, because it concerns the effects of agonism particularly within their setting. For some scholars and students, the ideas presented may even be new, challenging, and surprising.
The article's focus is on signaling the drawbacks of perpetuating the blind practice of agonism, particularly in academia. The author likely tackled this issue to raise awareness about a deep-rooted misconception that has been accepted and endorsed in Western culture for centuries. By exposing its negative effects, she expects that others will come to understand the problem and stop defaulting to an attack-oriented mindset when encountering new ideas.
Connection to The Argument Culture
Tannen draws several of her illustrative examples from her earlier work, The Argument Culture, which treated the same subject in the broader social contexts of journalism, politics, law, and education. In fact, some passages in the article are drawn directly from that book. This continuity demonstrates that her interest in the matter is profound and that her research has been conducted thoroughly.
Rhetorical Strategies and Metaphors
In order to denounce agonism effectively, Tannen makes use of metaphors, analogies, real-life examples, and quotations from other experts. She correlates the culture of agonism with a battle-oriented mindset — one that every person is educated to adopt and encouraged to perpetuate throughout their lifetime. Beyond the battle metaphor, she also employs images of a gun shootout and a public execution to convey the same combative spirit.
In contrast, Tannen introduces and supports the metaphor of building a structure to replace that of attacking. Under this alternative framework, a person encountering a new idea would direct energy toward understanding it and adding to it, rather than investing that energy in searching for weak points to criticize. She also enlists the words of sociologist Kerry Daly in proposing an analogy between theories and bread dough — suggesting that new theories should serve as foundations for further research rather than targets to be attacked with every available resource.
Conclusion
Overall, Deborah Tannen's article makes a convincing case against agonism at every level, with special emphasis on education. By combining metaphor, analogy, expert testimony, and personal narrative, she not only exposes the problem but also offers relevant alternatives with a genuine chance of shifting academic culture in a more constructive direction.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.