The Walter Scott Shooting: State and Federal Court Case Analysis
This paper examines the 2015 fatal shooting of Walter Scott by North Charleston police officer Michael Slager following a routine traffic stop. The paper summarizes the key facts of the case, identifies the state and federal laws violated — including civil rights deprivation, obstruction of justice, and use of a weapon in a violent crime — and explains why the case was prosecuted in both state and federal courts. It analyzes the dual sovereignty doctrine, the eventual guilty plea, and Judge David Norton's rationale for imposing a 20-year federal prison sentence. The paper concludes with a critical assessment of whether the case outcome was just, arguing that the dismissal of the murder charge and certain plea agreement provisions were not adequately justified.
- Overview of the Case Facts: Traffic stop leads to fatal police shooting
- Laws Violated and Potential Penalties: Civil rights, obstruction, and weapons charges explained
- State and Federal Court Jurisdiction: Grand jury indictments in state and federal courts
- Dual Sovereignty and Double Jeopardy: Simultaneous prosecution burdens and legal doctrine
- Case Outcome and Sentencing Decision: Judge Norton's 20-year sentence and reasoning
- Assessment of Whether the Outcome Was Justified: Critical evaluation of plea deal and dismissed charges
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds every claim in specific statutory citations (e.g., 18 U.S.C. §242, S.C. Code Ann. §16-3-10), giving the legal analysis credibility and precision.
- It systematically addresses each required analytical component — facts, laws, jurisdiction, outcome, and personal evaluation — in a clear, logical sequence.
- The concluding section offers a well-reasoned critical stance supported by specific procedural objections, such as the absence of mens rea language in the plea agreement and the unusual state dismissal provision.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of the dual sovereignty doctrine to explain why simultaneous state and federal prosecution was legally permissible, while also critically evaluating whether it was procedurally fair and efficient. This shows the student's ability to distinguish between legal permissibility and normative justification — a key skill in criminal justice analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a case-study format with six thematic sections: factual summary, statutory violations and penalties, court selection and jurisdiction, dual sovereignty analysis, sentencing outcome, and personal evaluation. Each section builds on the previous, moving from neutral description toward increasingly evaluative argument. This structure suits an undergraduate criminal justice or law course assignment.
Overview of the Case Facts
On April 4, 2015, an African-American motorist, Walter L. Scott, aged 50, was pulled over by North Charleston, South Carolina police officer Michael T. Slager, who had noticed a broken taillight on Scott's vehicle. According to the dashcam footage from the police vehicle, the officer and Scott appeared to be engaged in an ordinary verbal exchange. However, shortly after the officer returned to his patrol car, Scott abandoned his vehicle and fled on foot, prompting Slager to give chase.
On a grassy field adjacent to a muffler shop, the two men engaged in a physical struggle, reportedly over the Taser that Slager was carrying. A bystander who filmed the altercation captured the officer deploying his weapon during the scuffle, a subsequent struggle, an object falling to the ground, and Scott attempting to flee (Cook, 2015).
With Scott's back turned, the officer stood upright and stationary and fired at Scott eight times. Several shots struck him, causing him to fall facedown on the ground. Slager approached Scott, handcuffed him, called dispatch, and reported that a man who had taken his Taser was "down." Approximately a minute and a half later, he re-contacted dispatch to report that the man had multiple wounds and was unresponsive. Walter Scott died at the scene (Cook, 2015).
Laws Violated and Potential Penalties
Michael T. Slager, a white former South Carolina police officer, was charged under both state and federal law. Under state law, he was accused of shooting and killing an unarmed African-American motorist. Under federal law, he was additionally charged with depriving Scott of his civil rights (Charleston, 2016). Under South Carolina law, an individual convicted of murder faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years in prison or the death penalty.
One charge alleged that the former officer obstructed justice and illegally used a firearm in the commission of the murder (Charleston, 2016). According to the federal indictment, Slager, acting in his capacity as a law enforcement officer, violated Scott's civil rights. A separate count alleged that he used his Glock Model 21 .45 caliber pistol to do so (Charleston, 2016).
A further count, charging obstruction of justice, alleged that Slager deliberately misled South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) agents about what occurred during his deadly encounter with Scott. Specifically, he falsely told investigators that he only fired at Scott after Scott advanced on him with the Taser, when in reality Scott was fleeing with his back to Slager when he was shot multiple times (Charleston, 2016). A conviction for violating an individual's civil rights carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment and a fine of $250,000 (Charleston, 2016).
State and Federal Court Jurisdiction
A Charleston County Grand Jury indicted Slager on June 8, 2015, on a count of murder in violation of S.C. Code Ann. §16-3-10. On May 10 of the following year, a federal grand jury issued a separate indictment on three counts: (1) violating Title 18 U.S.C. §242 by depriving a citizen of his rights under color of law; (2) violating Title 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1)(A)(iii) by using a firearm during a violent crime; and (3) violating Title 18 U.S.C. §1512(b)(3) by obstructing justice. The primary trial began on October 31, 2016, in a South Carolina state court and lasted over one month before concluding in a mistrial on December 5, 2016 (Savage & Kent, 2017).
Prosecutors at the federal level included Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alyssa Richardson and Eric Klumb of the District of South Carolina, Rose Gibson of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, and Special Litigation Counsel Jared Fishman. State-level prosecution was handled by the 9th Judicial Circuit's Solicitor's Office under Solicitor Scarlett A. Wilson. SLED and the FBI's Columbia Division jointly investigated the case. According to Solicitor Wilson, this conviction demonstrated how effective results can be achieved through state and federal collaboration (Department of Justice, 2017).
Guilty plea documents confirmed that Slager, acting as a law enforcement officer, intentionally used deadly force against Scott despite that force being objectively unreasonable under the circumstances. Scott had been stopped for a malfunctioning taillight. Following a brief exchange, Scott fled and Slager gave chase. Slager deployed his Taser, a struggle ensued, and Scott fell. After getting back up and attempting to flee again — unarmed and with his back to Slager — he was shot eight times with the department-issued firearm. Five of the eight shots struck Scott from behind, and he died from his injuries at the scene (Department of Justice, 2017).
References
Charleston, C. (2016). Former South Carolina cop faces federal charges in death of unarmed black motorist. Retrieved April 7, 2018, from http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-south-carolina-police-shooting-20160511-story.html
Cook, J. A., III. (2015). Policing in the era of permissiveness: Mitigating misconduct through third-party standing. Brooklyn Law Review, 81, 1121.
Department of Justice. (2017). [Federal sentencing documents — Slager case].
Lacour, G. (2017). Michael Slager sentenced to 20 years in prison for fatal shooting of Walter Scott. Retrieved from
Manno, A. (2018). Judge releases 57-page order explaining former NCPD officer Michael Slager's 20-year sentence. Retrieved April 7, 2018, from https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/05/11/proactive-dept-of-justice-files-federal-charges-against-officer-michael-slager/comment-page-1/
Mason, C. (2017). Why did South Carolina punt on the Slager case? Retrieved April 7, 2018, from https://thecrimereport.org/2017/05/08/why-did-south-carolina-punt-on-the-slager-case/
Savage, A., & Kent, S. (2017). Motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds of double jeopardy, due process, and cruel and unusual punishment. Retrieved April 7, 2018, from https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/SLAGER-MOTION-to-DISMISS.pdf
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.