Fighting the War on Terror: Strategies to Prevent Another 9/11
This essay examines three core strategies for fighting the War on Terror and preventing another catastrophic attack on U.S. soil. Beginning with the importance of clearly identifying the enemy — from Jihadists to Ba'athists to state-sponsored networks — the paper proceeds to analyze the doctrine of anticipatory self-defense, including the Bush Administration's approach to state sponsors of terrorism through both diplomatic incentives and military force. The essay then turns to the role of the individual citizen, arguing that an informed and vigilant public is itself a critical line of defense. Drawing on examples ranging from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to the passenger response on Flight 93, the paper argues that government policy and civic awareness must work together to reduce the terrorist threat.
- Introduction: Post-bin Laden world still poses terrorist threats
- Know Thine Enemy: Identifying enemies clearly is essential to counterterrorism
- A Friend of an Enemy Is an Enemy: Targeting state sponsors through anticipatory self-defense
- The Onus Is on You: The Role of the Informed Citizen: Informed citizens form a critical line of defense
- Conclusion: Government and citizens must act together against terrorism
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The three-part argument structure is clearly signposted, moving logically from identifying the enemy, to targeting state sponsors, to empowering individual citizens — each section builds on the previous one.
- The use of concrete historical examples (Flight 93, the shoe bomber, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan) grounds abstract policy arguments in recognizable real-world events.
- The paper acknowledges counterarguments — such as the contested WMD rationale for the Iraq War — before reaffirming its thesis, demonstrating basic argumentative balance.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs a classic "claim–evidence–conclusion" paragraph structure for each of its three main sections. This scaffolding keeps the argument organized and ensures every major claim is supported before the author draws a section-level inference. Students can study how each body section functions as a mini-essay in its own right, with a premise, supporting evidence, and a closing synthesis.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a brief topical introduction referencing the killing of Osama bin Laden, then develops three body sections: (1) identifying the enemy using intelligence and the Bush doctrine; (2) the doctrine of anticipatory self-defense and the targeting of state sponsors; and (3) the civic responsibility of individual citizens to remain informed and vigilant. A short overall conclusion ties all three threads together into a unified policy recommendation.
Introduction
With the targeted killing of Osama bin Laden by U.S. Navy SEALs, the world achieved its biggest victory in the War on Terror since the campaign's inception. With the kingpin of al-Qaeda and the mastermind behind the September 11 attacks on the United States officially out of the picture, the world is a better place. Yet a "better" place does not necessarily mean a "safer" place. There are still radicals and Islamic fundamentalists — Jihadists and Ba'athists — and other enemies of the United States who would like to see this country suffer and who will stop at nothing to see their terrorist plans realized. In short, the world is still a dangerous place.
With that in mind, we must continue to safeguard this country from terrorist attacks. This essay investigates the ways in which we can effectively fight the War on Terror and ultimately prevent another 9/11.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.