Verified Document

Supreme Court Case: According To Research Paper

While the decision has hung over states as one national standard, it infringes the essential principles of federalism and separation of powers that are rooted in the country's constitutional system (Silversten, 2011). During the time that the Supreme Court made this ruling, the state of Georgia basically had the same position on punishment for the crime of rape with many states. Actually, very few states permitted the executions or enforcement of capital punishment for convicted rapists. Similar to many of the states, Georgia did not permit the execution of individuals convicted of rape mainly because of the constitutional requirement of proportionality. However, the Supreme Court made its ruling and conclusion through considering the objective indicia of the country's attitude toward capital punishment in rape cases. Nonetheless, this cannot be justified under the Constitution because the Supreme Court could have simply left the decision in place and restricted itself to analyzing the concerns and questions that were unexplored (Colb, 2003).

In making its ruling, the Supreme Court reversed the decision by Georgia's lower courts to give Coker the death penalty. As previously mentioned, the Supreme Court reversed the decision by Georgia's lower courts because it was considering the attitude of the nation toward death...

While the reason for the Supreme Court's decision is justified, the ruling has attracted huge debates and concerns in favor and against the decision.
Based on the constitutional requirement of proportionally, I don't agree with the Supreme Court's decision since it's arbitrary. This decision results in the treatment of child rape as qualitatively more heinous than that of an adult woman for the purposes of capital punishment (Adam, 2008). One of the major concerns about the decision is that it specifically considers the rape of adult women but does not effectively address the rape of adults in general.

Conclusion:

In order to prevent subjective enforcement of the death penalty, there are certain constitutional requirements for an offender to receive this punishment. The major constitutional requirement that is used to determine cases involving the death penalty is proportionality.

Sources used in this document:
References:

Adam, B. (2008, June 25). SCOTUS: Execution of Child Rapists Cruel, Unusual,

Unconstitutional. Retrieved July 29, 2012, from http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/06/25/541659/-SCOTUS-Execution-of-Child-Rapists-Cruel-Unusual-Unconst-l

Berman, D.A. & Bibas, S. (2008). Engaging Capital Emotions. Retrieved from Northwestern

University Law website: http://www.law.northwestern.edu/lawreview/colloquy/2008/17/
29, 2012, from http://edition.cnn.com/2003/LAW/09/12/findlaw.analysis.colb.rapists/index.html
"Death Penalty: An Overview." (2010, August 19). Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from Cornell University Law School website: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/death_penalty
Statutes Provide the Supreme Court an Opportunity to Return Meaning to the Eighth Amendment. Gonzaga Law Review, 37(1), 121-166. Retrieved from http://blogs.gonzaga.edu/gulawreview/files/2011/01/Silversten.pdf
"Types of Sentences." (n.d.). Cliff Notes. Retrieved July 29, 2012, from http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/Types-of-Sentences.topicArticleId-10065,articleId-10040.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in
Words: 1015 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in Re Waterman, 910 2D (N.H. 2006) The Case The case addressed in this section of the report is that of Supreme Court case In Re Waterman, 910 A.2d 1175 (N.H. 2006). In this case, Tracy Waterman, working as a trooper for the New Hampshire State Policy was informed on August 29, 3003 that Vicky Lemere, the wife of one of Waterman's fellow troopers, informed Lieutenant Nedeau,

Supreme Court Case Study
Words: 949 Length: 3 Document Type: Case Study

Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court Case Study Every year Supreme Court provides decision in cases that really impact the American citizen's rights. The aim of this analysis is to keenly check cases handled by the Supreme Court and the way they were given their final verdict. The parties involved sometimes get that the cases favor them or not depending on the existing laws or even through undermining the constitution. The case in

Supreme Court in Many Respects,
Words: 1125 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Three decades following the original Court decision, many Americans continued to believe that the Roe v. Wade decision was morally wrong and strongly believed that it should, and could, be overturned. Other Americans, however, continued to just as strongly support the Roe v. Wade original decision. They had a deep moral belief that a woman should not be coerced by the country's law to bear a child if, for

Supreme Court Case Monsanto V Bowman
Words: 1635 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

United States Patent and Trademark Office granted a patent to the Monsanto Company for its genetically modified seeds in 1994, and in 2006, the company developed a soybean that was resistant to glyphosate-based herbicides, including those that they sell directly to farmers. Indiana farmer Vernon Hugh Bowman started purchasing Monsanto seeds in 1999, agreeing to the company's policy that the seeds only be used for one growing season. Yet

Supreme Court Cases Involving Slaves
Words: 1861 Length: 5 Document Type: Research Paper

Supreme Court of the United States is commonly held to be the last bastion of getting a legal standard correct and complete. While legal precedents shift and change over time, the court eventually "gets it right" or at least comes to a settled position. However, there are other times where the court clearly gets it wrong and technically ensconces something that is wrong-minded and ill-conceived. Although Plessy v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Mississippi Cash Distributing Company, Inc. V. James...
Words: 875 Length: 3 Document Type: Case Study

Supreme Court of Mississippi. CASH DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. v. James NEELY. Facts In 1973, James Neely started working for Cash Distributing Co., a company that distributed Anheuser-Busch products in several parts of the United States. The company had offices in Columbus, Starkville and Tupelo. During the 1990s, James Neely was heading the Columbus office. By this time, Anheuser-Busch started to look more closely at the way some of its rules were enforced,

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now