Accounting - Economics Freakonomics An Term Paper

He also says that it is common to exaggerate information in anything from house ads to resumes. Why do Drug Dealers Still Live With Their Moms?

This chapter deals with conventional wisdom and when to question it, such as the idea that all drug dealers are wealthy, when if fact, many still live at home. The premise of this chapter is on how to find the right data to prove or disprove a theory, and how difficult that can be. To answer this question, Levitt found a researcher who had spent a long period of time with a black gang in Chicago, and learned how to ask the right questions to generate data about the gang. He finally showed that most gang drug dealing is only profitable for a very few upper echelon gang members, and most make little from their efforts.

Where Have all the Criminals Gone?

Levitt maintains that higher prison populations have helped deter crime, and that other things, like policing, gun control, and the economy and unemployment have not. He uses the theory that legalized abortion in 1973 actually caused the crime rate to go down, and cites Romania as an example, who outlawed abortion in 1966. Studies show that women denied abortions in Romania were less likely to provide a good home for the unwanted child, and the same could be said for women in America. More wanted babies were born, and the crime rate went down.

What Makes a Perfect Parent?

Levitt notes that parenting is difficult, and that parenting advice is often contradictory and confusing. He maintains that parenting experts, like others, instill fear in

...

Parents, operating out of fear for their children and being good parents, are not always the best risk assessors, and they rely on information that can be confusing at best, often provided by marketers and experts who hope to gain from the information and products they offer. Again, he researches the right data to find out what influences children, and discovers school choice does not matter, traditional family does not matter, neighborhood, and both parents working does not matter, and more. What matters is the background and educational level of the parents, and other qualities that most low-income children do not enjoy. Parenting matters, but so do socio-economic influences.
Perfect Parenting Part II: Or Would a Roshanda by Any Other Name Smell as Sweet?

Next, Levitt tackles names, particularly ethnic names that may put a child at a disadvantage. He says blacks and whites tend to name their children differently, and that often these different black names are not understood by the parents. In fact, some of the unusual black names seem not to be accepted in society, and may actually hinder the child's career choices in the future. In fact, Levitt maintains these names show how the parents view themselves and the opportunities open to their children. Again, education and income level are strongly related, and the more money a person makes, black or white, the more common and "normal" their children's names will be. He uses tables and charts to show popular white and black names, and speculate on what they will be in the future. Names may not make a difference in life, but the odder the name; the more the parent may be influencing how successful their child is by placing their own expectations on the child.

Epilogue: Two Paths to Harvard

Finally, the author discusses thinking "sensibly" about real people in the real world. He urges skepticism with accepted wisdom, and looking underneath a layer of society to discover the truth.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Levitt, Steven D. And Dubner, Stephen J. Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. New York: HarperCollins, 2005.


Cite this Document:

"Accounting - Economics Freakonomics An" (2007, April 13) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/accounting-economics-freakonomics-an-38624

"Accounting - Economics Freakonomics An" 13 April 2007. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/accounting-economics-freakonomics-an-38624>

"Accounting - Economics Freakonomics An", 13 April 2007, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/accounting-economics-freakonomics-an-38624

Related Documents

Loyalty to the client was clearly placed above loyalty to the overall public good and the standards of the profession. "Enron paid Andersen $25 million for its audit…and $27 million for 'consulting' and other services" which meant that Anderson had a substantial financial stake in retaining Enron as a client (Kadlec 2002). The Enron case illustrates the difficulty of self-policing within the industry. Today, providing additional services besides the

Accounting In just about any part of the world, accrual accounting is preferred by government over cash accounting, for several good reasons. To understand these reasons, the first step is to understand what the difference is between accrual accounting and cash accounting. Cash accounting is a standard form of accounting for very small businesses and for households, where the entire basis of accounting is the cash flows in and out. Under

Economic Growth and Happiness Economic Growth Can Lead to Healthier and Happier Societies More Availability of Goods Higher Income Increase in Tax Revenues and Better Welfare Programs. Increase in Purchasing Power Technological Advancement Health Industry Benefits Business Sector Benefits General Benefits Reflective statement Economic Growth Can Lead To Healthier and Happier Societies Economic growth has long been termed as the precursor to any society's success, and in this paper, we shall be looking at various aspects of economic growth that are directly

Economic Globalization Has the 2008 financial meltdown in the U.S. And the ongoing economic crisis in Europe have practically ended the era of economic globalization? Following the financial crisis that marred the U.S. economy along with other global economies as well as the ongoing Eurozone debt crisis, there have been projected concerns that this predicament would end economic globalization. The purpose of this paper is to assess this claim. Going by Immanuel

Freakonomics to some, from first look, would be considered another boring economics book. But in reality it is far from it. It is an innovative look on how economists view the world.. I learned so much in relation to the way the world works. I enjoyed the readings because they offered insights the "merit pay debate" for public school teachers, an area I was not too familiar with. Regardless of

Freakonomics (2005), the authors write, "Economics is, at root, the study of incentives: how people get what they want, or need, especially when other people want or need the same thing." In the midst of the global economic recession, an understanding of incentives is critical to how sport marketers sell their product to the public. Today, sports economics are inextricably tied to the fate of deep-pocketed corporations. Many sports