Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
In the example above of rape, it may be that an ex-boyfriend of the victim might be suspected of the crime. By taking a DNA sample from that suspect and by comparing it to DNA evidence gathered from the victim, this person can easily be ruled in or out as the perpetrator. This is crucial to the process of criminal investigation. As suspects are ruled out those facts guide the investigators to work more vigorously in other directions.
However, DNA can also serve justice after conviction has occurred. The Law School at Northwestern University has run a program for some years now serving selected people who believe they were convicted wrongly. By the year 2002, they had proven that 18 prisoners on Illinois' "Death Row" had been wrongfully convicted (Zwerdling, 1998). In Virginia, Earl Washington was freed from Virginia's "death row" after ten years when DNA testing proved that he was not the person who had raped and killed a victim (Barry, 2005).
Under the United States system of justice, we are obligated to find and convict those who commit serious crimes to the very best of our ability. At the same time, as a country with the
DNA plays a valuable dual role, then, in the pursuit of justice, because justice is handed down by flawed human beings. Occasionally those who prosecute can become over-zealous and seek to convict on flimsy evidence. DNA evidence is a powerful protection from such mistakes. At the same time, those who believe someone has been wrongly convicted can become over-zealous. Such emotionally-charged thinking can cause mistakes on both sides of the issue. Impartial, scientific evidence such as DNA testing removes emotion and opinion and helps our justice system look at the facts of the case dispassionately, impartially and fairly. This makes DNA evidence, when it is available, a crucial and invaluable tool in both the prosecution and appeal phases of our justice system.
Bibliography
Barry, Doug. "Cases in the News," in Truth in Justice. Accessed via the Internet 9/5/05. http://www.truthinjustice.org/inthenews.htm
Zolper, Thomas. 1996. "Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on DNA." The Record (Bergen County, NJ), Oct. 18.
Zwerdling, Daniel. 1998. "All Things Considered." National Public Radio (NPR), Nov. 15.
Bibliography
Barry, Doug. "Cases in the News," in Truth in Justice. Accessed via the Internet 9/5/05. http://www.truthinjustice.org/inthenews.htm
Zolper, Thomas. 1996. "Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on DNA." The Record (Bergen County, NJ), Oct. 18.
Zwerdling, Daniel. 1998. "All Things Considered." National Public Radio (NPR), Nov. 15.
Capital Punishment & DNA DNA Evidence, Capital Punishment, & the Criminal Justice System Capital Punishment is an issue of great contention. There are many people who strongly favor the use of capital punishment; there are also a great number of people that are adamantly against the use of capital punishment. DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) evidence has become a crucial factor in the criminal justice system and the issue of capital punishment. Since the
DNA The emergence of DNA testing has resulted in the exoneration of many people convicted of crimes. The ACLU (2011) has stated that 17 people on death row were exonerated as of September, 2011. A project in Virginia found 33 individuals convicted of sexual assaults who between 1973-1987 who were still incarcerated in 2012 and whose innocence was demonstrated by DNA testing (Michaels, 2012). DNA testing has proven effective at uncovering
DNA has improved the Forensics Field As technology and science have progressed, DNA evidence and its use within criminal forensics and trials have become more prevalent. This is not to say that every case hinges on DNA evidence, or that every crime scene can be worked over in order to obtain a criminal's DNA, but the knowledge of this tool within the forensics realm has reshaped the way in which
Practice What examples of the history of a particular social problem or construct could you use to illustrate the importance of an historical perspective to social work practice? The prevalence of false confessions and coerced guilty pleas has received renewed attention, in light of the use of DNA evidence to prove the innocence of persons convicted of serious crimes (Innocence Project, 2011). To date, 289 individuals have been exonerated through post-conviction
DNA in Criminal Cases - Solving Cold Cases in California with Forensic Science This research will attempt to analyze and discuss the feasibility of DNA testing in solving cold cases and will study the impact that DNA fingerprinting has had on the forensic science community as a whole. DNA is generally used to solve crimes in one of two ways. In cases where a suspect is identified, a sample of that person's
The privacy concerns form the bulk of the negative impact of DNA fingerprinting on United Kingdom society, and they are not at all unfounded. Several schools have implemented locks and record keeping mechanisms that depend upon a child's fingerprints (traditional, not DNA) (Edinformatics). These fingerprint mechanisms are used to track money for school meals, to replace library cards, and to alow access to school buildings and rooms in an attempt