Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Economic Models of Voting
It is generally believed that the more the economy grows (or slows down), the more all voters reward (or punish) the incumbent party for improving (or worsening) their economic situation. Presidential approval ratings often drive the results of the economic models of voting. These approval ratings are typically conceptualized as capturing both non-economic factors and other economic factors beyond near-election economic growth. This paper will discuss two major economic models of voting -- both of which show how economic outcomes may affect party choice. On the other hand, voters reward administrations if they reduce inflation or debt without reducing economic growth.
Economic Models of Voting
The competency model holds that voters reward the present political party for favorable economic outcomes and punish him for unfavorable outcomes (Vanderzee, 1997). More than 25 years ago, this hypothesis was first tested (Kramer, 1970 and Mueller, 1970), and more recently have Rogoff and Sibert (1988) provided a choice theoretical foundation for it. The basic idea behind their model is that parties may differ in their ability to generate favorable (economic) outcomes: some parties are simply more competent than other parties.
Rogoff and Sibert assume two things about competency. The first assumption is that voters cannot observe competency directly. As a result, to assess the competency of political parties voters must rely on outcomes. The second assumption is that competency is partially lasting: politicians who are able to generate favorable economic outcomes today are likely to be able to generate favorable economic outcomes tomorrow. Together, these assumptions imply the responsibility hypothesis.
Application of the competency model to a two-party system with one party in office and one party in opposition is simple. The incumbent party benefits from favorable economic outcomes and the opposition party suffers from them.
Basically, according to the competency model of voting, voters reward administrations that generate high real output growth rates without increasing
...
The policy oriented voter model describes how changing economic conditions affect election outcomes when different political parties have opposing objectives. The basic idea behind the policy oriented voter model is that voters care about permanent economic growth and distributive policies.
According to this model, changing economic conditions, which jeopardize economic growth prospects, increase the utility voters receive from policy of one party relative to the utility he receives from another party. Thus, the costs of distributive policies in terms of utility decrease with permanent real output growth. As a result, unfavorable economic growth prospects decrease the demand for distributive policies, and support for political parties which supply relatively distributive policies reduces as economic growth prospects become less favorable to voters.
The relationship between economic outcomes and voting is a complicated one. The extent to which a political party benefits from favorable economic outcomes depends on many other variables, not just economic ones. Still, it is apparent that voters reward the government for favorable economic outcomes and punish it for unfavorable economic outcomes.
Case Study
Economic models of voting are widely recognized paradigms in political science.
In its original form, economic voting models assume that voters evaluate the current government in terms of the outcomes produced by its policies, with the economy being a policy outcome of popular interest. Basically, economic voting is a type of policy voting.
For instance, Kramer (1971) and Stigler (1973) state that voters hold governments responsible for their policies rather than simply reacting in an emotional way to changes in the economy.
Recent studies use the economic voting model to explain cross-national variation in democratic satisfaction (Anderson and Guillory, 1997) and public support for the European Union (EU) (Anderson and Kaltenthaler 1996). While these studies examine international results, they adopt "peripheral" economic voting models. In the case of EU support, it is questionable why voters…
Bibliography
Brennan, G. (2001). Five Rational Actor Accounts of the Welfare State. Kyklos 54(2/3): 213-34.
Economic Studies 55: 1-16.
Kramer, G.H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896-1964. American
Mueller, D.C. (1989). Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voting Behavior Suffrage is an integral component of every American citizen's democratic rights and the law has given it top priority. But realities such as the difficulties encountered from the registration phase to the voting phase, emphasis on registration as a bureaucratic task, predispositions, election-specific forces and other determinants of participation have resulted in unclear and inconsistent pattern of voting behavior and inconclusive turnout and voting choices. Political scientists and thinkers
economics? A simple materialistic description simply does not do the subject justice. The economic approach is much more that an approach whose calculations are restricted to material goods and markets. Rather, it also should factor in other information that will explain human behavior. This can include actions based upon incomplete information, as well as the existence of costs (monetary and mental) that affect personal choices. Certainly, this type of economic
Economic Crisis The recession of 2008-2009 and the subsequent government responses provides a good test for economic theories. There are no controlled experiments in economics, so we can only work with case studies in order to understand how economies work. A good starting point is to consider the issue through multiple different lenses, so that we can understand how the crisis occurred and what prescriptions might be best suited for response
The number of educational institutions remained the same and child labor has also stagnated. Entrepreneurs were still allowed to employ children, which they did moreover when they paid them lower wages. Just like with the Meiji Era, the British Industrial Revolution opened new horizons and generated numerous development possibilities for the country and its population. The most important contributions were felt in the technological sector and materialized in a wide
However, other factors must also be considered. They refer to age, family, education, distance and unemployment. The age factor points out that younger people are more likely to migrate than older workers. This can be explained by the fact that the elderly have fewer years in which to benefit from the migration investment and that they often possess skills valuable for their current employer. The familial forces reveal that the
Corrections Gius, Mark. (1999). The Economics of the Criminal Behavior of Young Adults: Estimation of an Economic Model of Crime with a Correction for Aggregate Market and Public Policy Variables. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. October 01. Retrieved November 07, 2005 from HighBeam Research Library Web site. Mark Gius uses a combination of individual-level and county-level data to estimate an economic model of crime for young adults. This data is similar