Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Fairness of the Death Penalty:
The death penalty has been used across the globe for a long period of time as a means of punishment for offenders of serious crime. However, the use of this sentence has come under significant scrutiny in this century with regards to whether it's just and applied fairly. The scrutiny has contributed to the emergence of huge debates, especially after capital punishment has been used in high profile trials. As a result, capital punishment has become one of the most controversial topics throughout the world. The debates on whether it's just and applied fairly has been a major issue for policy makers, the criminal justice system, and the general public. From a theoretical perspective, sentencing a criminal to death is considered as an effective means of providing justice to victims and their families. However, when this practice is examined carefully, it emerges as an unjust form of punishment that is not applied fairly. This is realized when the death penalty is evaluated in light of various factors like deterrence, costs and rehabilitation where it seems inhumane and counter-productive.
The use of the death penalty as a form of punishment is not necessarily applied to the worst of the worst criminals. In most cases, the worst of the worst criminals do not receive the death penalty even though some of them plead guilty to murder. For instance, a former nurse escaped capital punishment because of an agreement with prosecutors though he pled guilty to committing murder...
It's estimated that of the 20,000 murders that take place in the United States annually, only 1% of the cases result in capital punishment. The failure to apply death sentences on these cases is attributed to various factors including the effectiveness of the lawyer that is usually based on ability to pay. According to the Arkansas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, "the death penalty targets lower-income offenders" (2010). The minimal portion of cases that end in capital sentences is attributed to the seeming inability to pay attorneys. Consequently, nearly every criminal on death row are too poor to afford their own lawyers during trial. In addition, the low-income criminals are sometimes given attorneys who are lack essential experience to handle capital punishment cases, are overworked, and are underpaid. Therefore, the death penalty is unjust and applied unfairly because it targets lower-income criminals since its application is dependent on ability to hire personal attorneys.
The death penalty is mostly used through conscious and unconscious prejudices regarding the worst types of criminals or sympathy to victims. The use of these prejudices in application of capital punishment arises from the failure of sentencing standards to adequately and appropriately guide sentences. Based on findings by the Death Penalty Information Center, "modern studies of the death penalty continue to find correlation between sentencing and race" (2013). Racial prejudices have dominated the application of capital punishment to not only show sympathy to victims but also determine the worst kinds of offenders. As evident in research findings, criminals who murder white victims are more likely to obtain capital punishment as compared to offenders who kill black victims. The role of race in the use of the death…
References:
"Arbitrariness." (2013, May 3). Death Penalty Information Center. Retrieved September 16,
2013, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/arbitrariness
"Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty." (2000). The Death Penalty. Retrieved from Michigan State University and Death Penalty Information Center website: from http://deathpenaltycurriculum.org/student/c/about/arguments/arguments.PDF
"The Case Against the Death Penalty." (2012, December 11). American Civil Liberties Union.
Retrieved September 16, 2013, from https://www.aclu.org/capital-punishment/case-against-death-penalty
Penalty. Retrieved September 16, 2013, from http://www.acadp.org/contents/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=39&Itemid=100039
The death penalty may exact a high cost but so does remaining behind bars for life imprisonment (Haag 1986). But righting wrongs in a society has a higher option than entailing the costs. Penalties are also acts of social retribution to restrain personal or private vengeance aimed at vindicating the law and social order, which has been injured or violated by a crime. Proponents or advocates of the death penalty
" This article puts forward the notion that when analyzing the "...relationships between minority groups and mainstream populations," the issue of whether the use of "formal control is applied fairly and consistently between these different groups" is a pivotal place to begin (Ruddell, et al., 2004). It is pivotal because "injustice" not only can have "a corrosive effect" on the perception of the fairness (or unfairness) of the criminal justice system;
Death Chamber Indeed, the death penalty is one of the most divisive issues in the entirety of the criminal justice system as it currently exists within the United States of America. Although many polls do suggest that a majority of Americans ultimately do support the employment of the death penalty, it faces stern and strong opposition from a violent minority that radically opposes the death penalty for a variety of reasons,
Our prejudiced minds and clouded vision make us believe that all black men are criminals resulting in a twisted criminal justice system. Thomas Sancton (1991) reveals, "...blacks and Hispanics are proportionally far more likely to be sent to death chambers than whites; that poor defendants are condemned more often than rich ones; that the existence of the death penalty, despite widespread beliefs to the contrary, in fact has no
The study also made an assessment of the 14 countries who eradicated the capital punishment. Murder went up by 7% from five years prior to the abolition period to five years following the abolition claimed by the study. Besides, researches were conducted by Prof. Issac Erlich from the years 1933 to 1969. He came to the conclusion that "An added execution per year might bring down the number of
Capital Punishment Currently, 38 states have legalized capital punishment statutes. In most states, the reinstatements of the death penalty were a response to public outcry over the perceived increase of violent crimes. There are now more than 3,000 people on death row, and more are being convicted each year. Despite this legalized status, a vocal group of opponents have raised questions regarding the constitutionality, fairness and effectiveness of capital punishment. This paper