Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Juvenile justice system is more than a century old, there are still significant controversies involved in terms of public policy and specific penalties. This is especially the case with severe crimes that, in adult courts, would result in life without parole or the death penalty. In the juvenile system, public policy has at best been somewhat confused regarding the best way to penalize youthful persons who engage in severe criminal activities. For this reason, various APA studies have been conducted to determine juvenile culpability and the appropriate type of sentence to promote a fairer justice system.
According to the APA (2012), for example, an adolescent brain's anatomy is in a stage of development that is less mature than the fully developed adult brain. Certain key areas, for example, remain less responsive to concerns of justice and self-control than do adult brains. Juveniles, for example, are more susceptible to peer... Furthermore, in addition to a lack of life experience, the anatomy of their brains implicate a less solid basis of self-control than what is available to the adult brain.
...
For this reason, the APA has suggested policy changes to remove the death penalty and life without parole as possible sentences for severe criminal activities by adolescents. The basis for this is that, up to a certain age, the brain is not structured in such a way to allow a person to take full responsibility for criminal activities. Hence, the law should be structured accordingly. In the Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. Alabama, the APA's amicus brief was cited to justify the ruling that mandatory life without parole is unconstitutional, even in cases where homicide is involved.
Various academic studies before and since this ruling have been conducted to investigate the justification of such policies. One of these is Cauffman and Steinberg's (2012) study to examine findings regarding the development of the adolescent brain.
At the basis of the paper were three fundamental questions, relating to culpability and appropriate punishment for juveniles, the ability of juveniles to stand as competent…
References
American Psychological Association (2012, Aug. 3). Psychology Gives Courts, Policymakers Evidence to Help Judge Adolescents' Actions. Retrieved from: http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2012/08/adolescent-actions.aspx
Cauffman, E., Steinberg, L. (2012). Emerging Findings from Research on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. Victims and Offenders. 7. Retrieved from: https://www.temple.edu/psychology/lds/documents/EmergingFindingsVictimsandOffenders.pdf
Juvenile Justice System currently faces a number of challenges in dealing with delinquency. Many of those problems are underlying problems such as mental health issues, child abuse, child neglect, lack of funding, and the disconnection between professions dealing with children, all of which contribute to delinquency. The high incidence of child abuse and child neglect, in particularly, have been directly linked to delinquency and must be sufficiently addressed. In the
In principle, the United States should follow international treaties only if it is a signatory to that specific treaty. However, the Supreme Court of the United States cannot ignore international standards completely either. There are several reasons for this. The world is becoming more and more globalized. Large numbers of immigrants have flocked to the United States in the last several decades and likewise American military and the FBI increasingly
Juvenile Justice System - Contemporary Juvenile Justice System and Juvenile Detention Alternatives" by William W. Patton (2012) The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution extended the protections afforded by the Bill of Rights to all American citizens, including juveniles. Today, juveniles in the United States, though, are considered special cases that require a different adjudicative approach than that provided adult offenders, but it has not always been this way. In
Juvenile Justice System Ireland The objective of this work is to examine the juvenile justice system in Ireland and then to compare it with the juvenile justice system of the United States. Additionally, the strengths and weaknesses of the juvenile justice system in Ireland will be examined as well as what improvements might could be made to the system, what the U.S. could learn from Ireland, and what aspects of each
Juvenile Delinquency and the Juvenile Justice System Juveniles are represented either in the legal system through the juvenile family court designed for children many years ago or by the criminal court system meant for adults. The criminal court system is opted for children suspected of committing serious crimes although transfer is possible from juvenile justice system into adult court system. This legal system has been the source of problems for all
juvenile justice system in America. The writer discusses the start of the system and the major changes that have taken place in the system over the past 100 years. There were four sources used to complete this paper. Following events such as Columbine the American public began to demand a re-evaluation of the juvenile justice system in this nation. What many people do not know is that the American juvenile