¶ … movie ( snapshot). Then, elaborate Typeface printin The 2009 film Typeface, which was directed by Justine Nagan and produced by Kartemquin Films, is a thoroughly fascinating documentary about the decline of traditional woodblock type and printing. The movie also focuses on the ramifications of that decline, which occurred in the wake of the transition to digital type and modern printing presses. There is a great deal of history in this film, which is centered on the Hamilton Wood Type and Printing Museum located in Two Rivers, Wisconsin. Most importantly, the movie highlights some of the intangible benefits of traditional wood type that are not found in the technologies used today. The result is the viewer gets a comprehensive overview of the benefits of the traditional method, and the reasons why it was forsaken for contemporary ones.

Another fairly intriguing aspect about this film is the fact that, despite the patent reduction in usage of wood type, there are still a number of people who are attempting to actually merge the best aspects of wood type with digital and modern printing technologies. A large part of this facet of the movie revolves around the employment of the Hamilton as a meeting space for workshops relating to printing and design. One weekend a month this museum -- which is actually the remnants of a conventional wood type printing establishment -- provides workshops for some of the more serious designers and printers from all around the country (Morris). They gather to learn about the older methods of typecasting and printing and strategize about ways in which they can incorporate them into modern practices.

The movie inevitably invokes comparisons between tradition and modernity, rural heartland America and the sprawling urban environments that have largely replaced it, as well as wood type and digital print. In doing so, it denotes a few key differences between the two which favor, at varying points, aspects of both sides. The contemporary world, with its heavy reliance upon...

It is this aspect of time which has largely eradicated the usage of wood type for today's contemporary needs, although, as the movie indicates, there are some people who still utilize wood type for special occasions such as weddings. However, whereas at one point wood type was used for virtually all publishing (most eminently newspapers) in the 19th century, the type it takes to finish a job is vastly longer than that which computers and modern methods use. From this particular perspective, the film emphasizes that computerized printing is substantially more efficient than wood type; this factor is the primary reason for the decline of the latter.
However, wood type was responsible for creating a specialized industry of artisans who focused on this particular trade. As such, there are certain elements of wood type that simply cannot be duplicated via traditional printing processes. One of those is the aesthetic quality of errors in wood type that at once renders a character or a printing unique. The subsequent passage attests to this fact.

"Much like wood type itself, this film is flawed. But, unlike wood type, not always in a good way…Designer Stacey Stern really hit the nail on the head for me when she talked about the beauty of decaying wood type, how the flaws are the best part (Weissman).

The inherent flaws in wood type and the appreciation for them that this passage suggests are on the key elements of it. It represents a human uniqueness which is difficult to duplicate utilizing computers. As such, this aspect of wood type is one of the more important ones, and a testament to the fact that modernity, convenience, and even speed are not always better.

Additionally, when comparing woodblock techniques vs. digital or computer printing, it…