Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Public Law 90-65, dated August 19, 1967, authorized the Secretary to include extra capacity in the Tehama-Colusa Canal to enable it to provide future water service to areas that could be authorized as an extension of the CVP." (Chapter III, 1) The expectation accorded here would be the share of construction costs amongst those who would ultimately use the water source, meaning that this would become a publicly shared cost repaid through traditional avenues of taxation.
Such common costs allow for a greater flexibility of internal decision making, with an expansion into wider arenas. The shared responsibility of repayment allows for some expenditure in other areas of development as well as the expansion of investment into nature reclamation projects. In a similar regard though, decision-making is actually removed in some capacities from the jurisdiction of CVP's accounting department, with the legislative demands of State and local authorities imposing certain use of resources upon the utility firm. The case study denotes that "costs reported in the financial statement are disaggregated, as necessary. The total costs of many features reported in the financial statement include cost components that are to be directly assigned to a non-reimbursable expense category or are subject to allocation and repayment criteria that differ from those of the main feature." (Chapter III, 1)
In either regard though, decision-making is largely accommodated by the accuracy of cost-allocating and the computational analysis there applied. The case...
...
In the resolution, it is clear that CVP benefits significantly from approaching cost allocation analysis according to the firm's relationship with a host of interacting parties. The complexity of this picture reveals the nuance of understanding and regulating cost priorities for a utilities sector firm with interest in public use, government participation, private partnership and in-house administration. In all of these parties are represented a set of intervening responsibilities, interests, expenditures and repayment obligations. Dividing these into distinct categories for assessment allows for a fuller understanding of the correlation between expenditure responsibilities and their relationship to repayment responsibilities. In the outlook provided by the case study, CVP demonstrates the capacity for viability based on the balance between its allocation of costs and the common share of repayment responsibilities.
CVP The performance of the company last time through was not bad, but with the application of proper management techniques, it could be improved. One such technique is cost volume profit analysis. This is the technique that will be applied to the company in this upcoming simulation. This paper will analyze how CVP analysis contributes to the strategy, including an analysis of its strengths and weaknesses. CVP Analysis Cost volume profit analysis is
Common costs are allocated when the cost falls under federal auspices. Costs that are the responsibility of the state, such as the 55% share of the San Luis Unit, are not included in the allocation base. Non-reimbursable costs are also not included in the allocation base and are ultimately the responsibility of the taxpayer. Some other costs are also not allocated, or are subject to unique allocation methods. These are
The above table indicates that the sales volume which is required in order to achieve a $100 M. profit at a price of $245 with an R&D investment of 30% is 1,676,190 units. This is calculated by dividing the total revenue accrued by the unit price. X6: The product X6 has been in the market for a total of 2 years. Unlike the product x5, the customers take great consideration of the
Profit (CVP) analysis is noted by Cafferky and Wentworth (2010) to be an important decision making tool for managers. CVP helps managers in understanding the connection between the cost and volume with organizational profits in mind.In our previous exercise, we contemplated going back in time and then coming up with the best choices regarding the manufacture of the three handheld devices- X5, X6 and X7. In this study, we
profit analysis was introduced, but the execution was lacking. One of the important factors is that CVP analysis requires a number of data points so that the elasticities of demand for the product can be determined. There is still going to be the wild card of R&D investment, but setting prices is an important determinant of demand. Working on theory rather than data last time, the results were perhaps
CVP Analysis The best way to approach this situation is to understand some basic concepts. First, each product has fixed costs. Thus, the fixed costs are going to exist in every year a product is sold. This has ramifications for the X5 in the final year. The second factor that needs to be considered is cost-volume-profit analysis. This technique is used to determine the contribution to fixed costs that each product makes.