Comparison Of Risks And Benefits Of Traditional Shift Report Versus Bedside Shift Report Capstone Project

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW APPRAISAL & GRADING CRITERIA

APA Reference:

1. What organization or persons produced the systematic review (SR)?(6pts)

Courtney L. Williams

Cardiac Telemetry Unit, Lakeland Health, Saint Joseph, Michigan, USA

2. How many persons were involved in conducting the review? (6pts)

Sam Abraham, Associate Professor of Nursing, 1001 Bethel Circle, Bethel College School of Nursing, Mishawaka, Indiana, 46545, USA.

3. What topic or question did the SR address? (6pts)

Comparison of Risks and Benefits of Bedside Shift Report vs Traditional Shift Report

4. How were potential research reports identified? (6pts)

The quality of care, safety risks, and occurrence of medical errors have been linked to inadequate communication between nurses during shift change. Historically, shift reports took place at nursing stations and not at the patient's bedside, which could lead to interruptions, elongated processes, and inaccurate reporting (Reinbeck & Fitzsimons, 2013). Although bedside shift reporting has been introduced in the nursing field, there are still challenges that pose a risk to patients. Nurses are often uninformed about the advantages and disadvantages of bedside and traditional shift reporting.

5. What determined if a study was included in the analysis? (6pts)

Extensive research on the topic of bedside shift report, traditional shift report, risks of shift reporting, and communication was conducted by reviewing scholarly and peer-reviewed journal articles from 2013 to 2018. The literature was subjected to a careful analysis and was systematically organized using the top four levels of the evidence hierarchy.

6. How many studies were included in the review? (6pts)

A total of 8 studies were included:

Cairns, L.L., Hoffmann, R.L., Dudjak, L.A., & Lorenz, H.L. (2013). Utilizing bedside shift report to improve the effectiveness of shift handoff. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 43(3), 160-165. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e318283dc02

Ghosh, K., Curl, K., Goodwin, M., Morrell, P., & Guidroz, P. (2018). An exploratory study on how to improve bedside change-of-shift process: Evidence from one hospital using technology to support verbal reporting.

Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3180-3187. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.401

Ofori-Atta, J., Binienda, M., & Chalupke, S. (2015). Bedside shift report: Implications for patient safety and quality of care. Nursing, 45(8), 1-4....…minimize medical errors, safety hazards, and enhance the quality of care. Inconsistency in the use of BSR within healthcare organizations requires changes to be made in order to meet industry standards. With bedside report, the nurse is able to physically assess the patient within the first 30 minutes of their shift, assess any potential risks to the patient, ensure the patient is aware of their caregiver, and activate the bed alarm to prevent falls and further harm. The maintenance of BSR in the acute-care environment may be challenging. For BSR to be sustained as part of nursing practice, leadership from management and senior nurses will be necessary. The implementation of BSR is recognized as the standard of care that provides the highest degree of patient safety and patient-centered care.

1) A comparison of the risks and benefits of nursing bedside shift report vs. traditional shift report: A systematic review of the literature. https://doi.org/10.20849/ijsn.v3i2.382

2) Reducing falls in older adults recently discharged from hospital: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy043

3) Quantitative exploration of…

Cite this Document:

"Comparison Of Risks And Benefits Of Traditional Shift Report Versus Bedside Shift Report" (2023, February 05) Retrieved May 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparison-risks-benefits-traditional-shift-report-versus-bedside-capstone-project-2178130

"Comparison Of Risks And Benefits Of Traditional Shift Report Versus Bedside Shift Report" 05 February 2023. Web.19 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparison-risks-benefits-traditional-shift-report-versus-bedside-capstone-project-2178130>

"Comparison Of Risks And Benefits Of Traditional Shift Report Versus Bedside Shift Report", 05 February 2023, Accessed.19 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparison-risks-benefits-traditional-shift-report-versus-bedside-capstone-project-2178130

Related Documents

Systematic review of isolation policies in the hospital management of methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A review of the literature with epidemiological and economic modelling The rise of MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) continues to be a problem in hospitals throughout the world. In the article entitled "Systematic review of isolation policies in the hospital management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus" Cooper (et al. 2003) conducted a literature review of various containment efforts in the

Systematic Review
PAGES 6 WORDS 2235

With the rapid increase in the research conducted on health sciences, there is difficulty for researchers and clinicians to be up-to-date with the studies. Therefore, reviews that give a summary of the impact of different intervention experiments are a greatly efficient way to come up with a conclusion of what is effective and what isn't. Systematic reviews are different from the traditional kind in many ways. According to Petticrew and

Antenatal Education Systematic Review Antenatal education programms In pregnant women, how does group antenatal education compare to no antenatal education or individual antenatal education for improving outcomes of childbirth and parenting? In pregnant women, how does group antenatal education compare to no antenatal education or individual antenatal education for improving outcomes of childbirth and parenting? Antenatal education programs are key in improving maternal health all over the world. They have been widely embraced in

O'Meara stresses that a system known as a Decision Support System of DSS can be integrated into existing it to identify potential errors that could be made on any given case and provide the staff with flags to help them avoid such errors. (December 2007, pp. 970-979) DSS technology can seriously improve the chances that patients will not receive inadequate care or that services and potential challenges to them get

They added newer constructs to a PSC model developed earlier by Gershon and his colleagues (2000), which unveiled the relationship of safety and security aspects and linked it with work performance. They found that when hospital staff used the Gershon tool there was considerable increase in the patient safety culture. They concluded that the health care decision makers when using Gershon safety tools, which appear to have sufficient reliability

Patient care and recovery statistics demonstrate that the United States has a medical care system with which Americans are less satisfied than other citizens in developed countries. There are many reasons for this: correlation between health and socioeconomic status; non-universality; federal government is not involved in medical planning although it purchases a large percentage of the 14% health care GNP; lobbying and special interest group interference; and political opposition to