Exchange Rate Crisis
Exchange rate crises are quite common phenomena in the economic world. From the 1994 Mexican crisis and the 1997 Asian crisis to the 1999 Argentine crisis, currency crises have occurred with a somewhat remarkable frequency. Also, known as currency crises or balance of payments (BOP) crisis, exchange rate crises occur when a country's monetary authority (central bank) has inadequate foreign exchange reserves to sustain its set exchange rates. This is usually caused by trade shocks, persistent budget deficits, foreign interest rate shocks, political uncertainty, banking system weaknesses, and moral hazard problems. An exchange rate crisis is often symbolised by factors such as hyper-inflation, banking crisis, devaluation, and economic recession, clearly indicating the dire consequences a currency crisis can have on the economy. More importantly, an exchange rate crisis can easily spread beyond the national boundary, underscoring the need for measures to prevent the crisis. This paper discusses the ways in which a country can avoid an exchange rate crisis, as well as circumstances under which the mechanisms are likely to be effective or ineffective.
When a currency crisis occurs, a country can respond by shifting to a floating exchange rate regime, devaluing the currency, raising interest rates, borrowing internationally, bailout, and/or defaulting on debt or requesting for debt forgiveness. These measures can offer great relief in the event of an exchange rate crisis. For instance, floating the currency can result in exchange rate depreciation, improved net exports, and increased output, thereby restoring the equilibrium. Whereas these measures can successfully heal an exchange rate crisis, they are generally curative in nature. It is more desirable and effective to focus on preventing the crisis in the first place as opposed to responding when it occurs.
One way through which an exchange rate crisis can be avoided is by adopting a more sustainable exchange rate regime. A major cause of a currency crisis is a fixed exchange rate regime. Fixing exchange rates presents immense risks to an economy. This is particularly true for emerging markets, which tend to be characterised by fast capital flow as well as underdeveloped financial systems. In...
With a sustainable exchange rate regime, these problems can be avoided. Nonetheless, for the underlying exchange rate regime to effectively prevent an exchange rate crisis, the prevailing monetary policy must be favourable. A sustainable exchange rate regime usually requires relinquishing the independence of monetary policy to some extent.
A country can also avoid an exchange rate crisis by strengthening capital markets. The connection between capital markets and economic development is too significant to be overlooked. Robust capital markets facilitate a smooth and efficient flow of capital, goods, and ideas between developed and developing markets. It is imperative for developing markets to ensure effective monitoring of risk and put in place measures to balance lending and borrowing. The success of the strategy requires extensive involvement of developed countries. As the international economy, will increasingly resort to developing markets for capital, it is vital for developed countries to support developing markets in strengthening their capital markets. Switzerland's Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has particularly played an instrumental role in promoting capital market efficiency. The bank has forged information sharing amongst central banks and provided guidelines for evaluating capital adequacy in banks.
Minimising vulnerability to sudden shifts in investor confidence also offers a valuable way of preventing an exchange rate crisis. When a currency crisis occurs, the confidence of investors in the affected country often shifts immediately. A country can address this vulnerability by ensuring more efficient management of its external finances, avoiding moral hazard between domestic banks and private borrowers, and maintaining the exchange rate at a sustainable level by the prevailing reserves. Vulnerability to drastic shifts in investor confidence can also be reduced by inclining towards more stable forms of foreign direct investment (FDI) as well as instituting capital controls to limit the extent to which foreign entities can pull out money from the country within a given period of…
Exchange Rate Fluctuations Forex's opening trade on February 14, 2012 for the U.S. Dollar- Euro was one Dollar for .7593 Euros (Google Finance.com. February 14, 2012). Over the period covering the "Great Recession" and the subsequent recovery, the Euro has moved in a yo-yo pattern, at times buoyed by a weak dollar policy of the U.S., and alternately battered by a flight to safety as investors seek the relative strength of
fixed and floating exchange rates mechanisms are the exact opposites of one another, the advantages of one are generally the disadvantages of the other. Anyhow, in order to be able to evaluate for each case in part its positive and negative aspects, we should start with defining each, as most of the advantages and disadvantages derive there from. The fixed exchange rate mechanism refers to a mechanism where "the government
Theoretically speaking, there is only one factor affecting the exchange rate of a country adopting a floating exchange rate regime: the supply and demand of the respective currency on the international market. In this sense, if demand exceeds supply, then the value of the currency will go up and the respective currency will appreciate. On the other hand, if supply exceeds demand, the currency will depreciate and the price of
country can interfere in the foreign exchange markets. In many cases, the motivation for doing so lies with propping up exporters, by lowering the value of the domestic currency. While this is the most common reason for currency manipulation, it is not the only one. In some cases, currency manipulation aids in the cause of making debt disappear, lowering the value of that debt in order that it might
Managing Exchange Rate Risk For a number of multinational corporations, currency fluctuations can pose an extreme risk for them. This is because of sudden changes and dramatic amounts of volatility inside the marketplace can have a negative effect on their bottom line results. When this happens, there is a realistic possibility that these challenges could negatively impact their financial position and ability to compete inside many different markets. (Berger, 2011) In the
Exchange Rate Volatility on Trade Flows Exchange Rate Volatility Impact on International Trade Flows Exchange Rate Volatility Impact on International Trade Flows Bretton Woods Trade Flow Trade Flow Responsiveness Commodities The dissolution of the Bretton-Woods system in 1973 introduced a new era for international markets. No longer would the exchange rates be pegged and fluctuating exchange rates changed the game for international trade and investment. The newly introduced increase in volatility in the foreign exchange markets also increases