Fragmentation In Intergovernmental Relations Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
701
Cite

Overlapping Model of IGR Presentation Preparation

1 Introduction

This presentation describes and discusses Deil Wrights seminal work on IGR. It identifies the model, describes three types of IGR, explains how they relate, and what is meant by cooperation, conflict, competition and fragmentation.

2 Deil Wrights Seminal Work

Deil Wright's seminal work on intergovernmental relations (IGR) proposed a model that has been widely influential in both academic and policy circles. In his view, IGR can be understood as the ways in which different levels of government interact with one another.

This interaction can take many forms, including cooperation, conflict, competition, and fragmentation (Hamilton & Stenberg, 2018).

3 Three Types of IGR

Wright's model identifies three main types of IGR: horizontal, vertical, and diagonal. Horizontal IGR occurs between units at the same level of government, such as between two provinces. Vertical IGR takes place between units at different levels of government, such as between the federal government and a province or state. Diagonal IGR involves interactions between units that are not at the same level of government, such as between a municipality government of one state and the government of another state.

4 How They Interact and Overlap

These three types of IGR are not mutually exclusive; in fact, they often overlap and interact with one another. In reality, these types of IGR are often intertwined. For example, horizontal IGR may involve negotiations between different provinces in Canada, while vertical IGR may come into play...…power and resources (Burke & Brudney, 2018).

8 Coordination

Coordinated IGR exists when there is some degree of coordination between different levels of government, but not necessarily a full consensus.

9 Fragmentation

Fragmented IGR occurs when there is little or no communication or coordination between different levels of government.

10 Conclusion

Wright's model has proven to be a valuable tool for understanding the complex ways in which different levels of government interact with one another. Interestingly, Deil Wright's intergovernmental relations (IGR) model can be used to help us understand both the potential for conflict and the potential for cooperation between different levels of government. But as we can see, then, the IGR model provides a helpful way of understanding the potential for both conflict…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Burke, B. F., & Brudney, J. L. (2018). Why We Fight: Conflict and “Coping” in Twenty-First-Century Intergovernmental Relations. In Intergovernmental relations in transition (pp. 58-74). Routledge.

Hamilton, D. K., & Stenberg, C. W. (2018). Introduction: Intergovernmental Relations inTransition. In Intergovernmental Relations in Transition (pp. 1-12). Routledge.

Kincaid, J. (2018). Why coercion and cooperation coexist in American federalism.

In Intergovernmental relations in transition (pp. 37-57). Routledge.

Stenberg, C. W., & Hamilton, D. K. (2018). Back to the Future?: The Road Ahead.

In Intergovernmental Relations in Transition (pp. 276-284). Routledge.


Cite this Document:

"Fragmentation In Intergovernmental Relations" (2022, November 17) Retrieved July 22, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/fragmentation-intergovernmental-relations-essay-2178868

"Fragmentation In Intergovernmental Relations" 17 November 2022. Web.22 July. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/fragmentation-intergovernmental-relations-essay-2178868>

"Fragmentation In Intergovernmental Relations", 17 November 2022, Accessed.22 July. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/fragmentation-intergovernmental-relations-essay-2178868

Related Documents

Once more oriented to the minimal statistics gathering and funding assistance between more or less watertight compartments, intergovernmental relations (IGR) has evolved into dynamic and highly integrated sets of behaviors, not only between agents of government but among a host of non-governmental actors, non-profit and for-profit." (Agranoff, 2008) Agranoff states that intergovernmental relations appear to have started with "the territorial organization of states, often termed in international nomenclature as

Still, state and local governments must realize that unfunded mandates will still occur, and when that happens, federal resources must be made available to state and local governments in order to help them make responsible financial decisions. Thus, an advisory board should be put into place to assist state and local governments in dealing with unfunded federal mandates as a further bridge in the communication gap between these two

They call for greater recognition in the national policies, which negatively affect the goals (Zeemering, 2007). Taking a critical perspective, I find the Federalism and intergovernmental relations to be undemocratic. This system propagated the tendency towards executive dominance in the American system. It further limits the senate and the legislatures. In spite of the increasing number of open conferences, the process has stringent measures to reinforce the government secrecy. As

For example, we could consider a local agricultural project. The local and state expertise in determining what are the right decisions to be made on this project should be more useful and in a more timely manner than decisions that could be made at a federal level. In the current security and economic environment, the answer is probably somewhere mid-way between all the notions previously presented. From this perspective, a

This program requires the states to create their own safety standards and to implement their rail safety oversight and audit programs in measuring compliance to that program. But the diversity of legal authorities, budgets and staff levels of oversight agencies would not allow this to happen smoothly (Caruso). The proposed Public Transportation Safety Program Act of 2009 hoped to authorize the Department of Transportation to establish the minimum safety standards

Participatory Budgeting CMA In the late-capitalist era during the late twentieth century restructuring of Canada's municipalities toward a new model of intergovernmental alliances, known as 'city-regional' governance, the importance of Public Choice as praxis to reconfiguration of the nation's market relations was asserted by urban planning and political theorists interested in the impetus and affects of the what became known as the Consolidation Movement. A decade of exposure to James Lightbody's