Lindbergh Kidnapping Case Study

Lindbergh Kidnapping Lindberg Kidnapping

The Lindberg kidnapping was one of, and the most to some, notorious crime and/or kidnapping in the 20th century. The ways and means that had to be used given the targets of the kidnapping, what happened to the child after being taken and so forth all change crime scene and death investigations in general forever. There is plenty of controversy associated with the crime even though the man convicted was given a chance to have his life spared the death penalty if he copped to the crime but he refused and he also refused a pay-off from a local publication.

One of the things that jumps out to the author of this report is that the convicted man, Mr. Hauptmann, was able to at least delay his death sentence if he just admitted he did it but he ostensibly either did and refused to give the public the satisfaction of hearing him say it or he simply refused to admit to something he did not do even if it cost him his life (Linder, 2005). The forensic evidence for the case was pretty solid although a lot of the evidence that ended up convicting Hauptmann was circumstantial and fairly thin at best.

For example, even the best forensic analysis of the ransom notes cannot definitively tie the notes to Hauptmann even though most of them agree his guilt is likely…but certainly not precise. Also, the...

...

An eyewitness put him near the scene but that proves little.
All of this adds up to the idea that perhaps Hauptmann did NOT commit the crime and, as a matter of principle, he refused to admit to the crime. Another complicating factor was the actions of John Condon which were probably not much more than grandstanding and media theater. The parallels between that and other public figures that, while almost certainly if not definitely involved, distract from the case and its solving are not hard to find in much more recent cases like the Chandra Levy death and the associate foot-dragging by politician Gary Condit and the involvement of media icon Nancy Grace in several cases including one where a harassed potential perpetrator committed suicide after being pestered by Nancy Grace and others (Lohr, 2012)(WashingtonPost.com, 2013).

Speaking of Nancy Grace, much the same thing as the woman in the more modern case committing suicide happened during the Lindbergh case. However, the pressure that was brought on this person was by the police and the involved party was Violet Sharpe. The problem with Sharpe was that she seemingly provided contradictory information to investigators and it was feared that she was involved or ran the kidnapping. As it turns out, her alibi was verified by she committed suicide due to potentially losing her job and the overall pressure of the police investigation. She was about to be questioned a fourth time around the time that she ingested silver cleaner and took her own life. This course of…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Linder, D. (2005, January 1). An Account of the Trial of Richard Hauptmann. UMKC School of Law. Retrieved September 20, 2013, from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/Hauptmann/AccountHauptmann.html

Lohr, D. (2012, July 12). Toni Medrano, Dubbed 'Vodka Mom' By Nancy Grace, Committed Suicide, Police Say. Breaking News and Opinion on The Huffington Post. Retrieved September 20, 2013, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/11/toni-medrano-vodka-mom_n_1665792.html

WashingtonPost.com. (2013, September 20). Who Killed Chandra Levy? (washingtonpost.com). The Washington Post: National, World & D.C. Area News and Headlines - The Washington Post. Retrieved September 20, 2013, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/specials/chandra/


Cite this Document:

"Lindbergh Kidnapping" (2013, September 20) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lindbergh-kidnapping-96777

"Lindbergh Kidnapping" 20 September 2013. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lindbergh-kidnapping-96777>

"Lindbergh Kidnapping", 20 September 2013, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lindbergh-kidnapping-96777

Related Documents

He further sees agitation for the war on the part of the Roosevelt administration as no more than a political ploy to retain office. He also seems to believe that the three groups he cites -- -the British, the Jews, and the Roosevelt administration -- -are in some sense colluding to get America into the war. He creates an entire scenario about how these groups reacted to news of the

Efficacy of Handwriting Analyses as Forensic Evidence Humankind has been writing for millennia, but it has only been in the last 100 years or so that individual handwriting samples could be distinguished by forensic document examiners to the extent that their testimony was deemed admissible as evidence in a court of law. In recent years, this analysis has been augmented by sophisticated handwriting analytical devices that are being used by national

Jury Selection Process, Sequestration, Verdict and Relevant Controversies: OJ Simpson's case had already set the record for being the longest jury trial in the history of California even before the commencement of closing arguments. For a better part of the year, the jury in the case had been sequestered and was displaying signs of exhaustion and strain (Linder, 2000). Actually, Judge Ito was blamed for permitting the trial to drag on

The popularity of the case made celebrities out of the judge, lawyers and criminal justice officials participating in the case. Today, 11 years after the case ended, the debate continues. Guilty or Not? Evidence displayed by the prosecution included a genetic match between Simpson's blood and blood found at the crime scene and proof that blood matching both Goldman's and Nicole Simpson's was found in Simpson's Ford Bronco and in his

It was called the “Trial of the Century,” after which Bruno Hauptmann was executed in the electric chair in April, 1936, having been convicted of the kidnapping and murder of Charles Lindbergh’s infant son (Cornwell 1). Lindbergh’s fame as one of Americans aviation heroes made Hauptmann’s a high profile case, one that might have also been tried in haste. Subsequent analyses of the Hauptmann trial indicate that the prosecution’s case

Policing History 1823- Stephen F. Austin known as the "Father of Texas" receives permission from the Mexican Government to employ ten men to protect the new Texas frontier. This marks the beginning of the long storied and infamous Texas Rangers. This is significant because it the initiation of one of the first law, and order enforcement agencies in the history of America. 1845- New York, this date and location is widely