This paper compares and contrasts the themes, ideas, and genres of Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" and the film adaptation of Suzanne Collins' The Hunger Games. The former is a short story satire while the latter is a roving epic with heroes and heroines. Both, however, look at the darker side of human nature--in different ways.
Lottery and Games
Comparing and Contrasting "The Lottery" with the Hunger Games
While both Shirley Jackson's short story "The Lottery" and the film adaptation of Suzanne Collins' the Hunger Games address issues of institutionalized moral depravity, Jackson's short story is better read as an inverted representation of Christ's command, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone," rather than as a glimpse of the sort of dystopian world the Hunger Games represents. The Hunger Games offers a sense of moral order through the character of Katniss, which barely surfaces in Jackson's tale. Jackson's "Lottery," after all, is more akin to a work of shocking satire than to an adventure story in which heroes and heroines overcome obstacles, character arcs are developed, and conflicts are resolved. This paper will compare and contrast the nature of the Hunger Games with Jackson's "The Lottery" and show how the former attempts to explore in epic style a dystopian world riddled with amorality, while the latter simply means to expose a disturbing truth at the heart of society -- namely, that it is anti-Christian in practice.
The biggest way in which Jackson's "Lottery" is different from Collins' Games is in the fact that Jackson's setting is never named: it is merely a village, unspecified and accepted by the reader on its own simple terms. Collins' Games on the other hand is set in a very detailed futuristic world known as Panem, once known as the United States of America. The Hunger Games, therefore, is situated in a real place in real time. Its parameters are set and defined: it is given a backstory, a history of its own, a foundation upon which characters can be built, and an overall theme that might measure up to the demands of the epic narrative. The Hunger Games film is the first of what looks to at least a trilogy. The enormity of the work allows it to develop conflict and move toward resolution while exploring themes like hope vs. despair and chance vs. free will. Even though such themes might be found in diminished form in Jackson's "Lottery" they are nowhere near as developed as in the Hunger Games. Jackson's "Lottery," on the contrary, limits itself to a single occurrence -- a day in the life of the citizens of a village that has institutionalized the act of throwing stones. While no reference is made in the short story to the edict of Christ found in Scripture, the parallel is obvious: Mrs. Hutchinson has thrown stones (or judged others, as the symbol of throwing stones may be understood) and now is stoned by others (or rather receives her reward/punishment). The fact that the characters partake in this lottery of their own free will only adds to the irony of the narrative: these villagers act to their own disadvantage, knowingly and willingly, and yet see little reason to stop. The complaint of Mrs. Hutchinson at the end of the story, "It isn't fair," shows just how ridiculous she is: the lottery seemed perfectly fair before -- when she was winning. It is an obvious commentary by Jackson on society's willingness to judge others, throw stones, and have judgment passed on themselves -- when all people really need do is abstain from judgment and be spared judgment themselves.
Another way in which the two works are different is in the fact that the Hunger Games has a dynamic heroine named Katniss, while "The Lottery" has no real hero or heroine. Katniss in the Hunger Games represents the kind of Christian heroic ethic of self-sacrifice that, in fact, is missing from "The Lottery." Katniss saves her sister by volunteering herself in her sister's place. It is an enormous act of courage and charity on her part. Such action is completely missing from Jackson's satire -- and for good reason. Jackson has not written a story that commends man's good deeds but rather indicts society for its hypocritical practices. The Hunger Games, on the other hand, extols the virtues and abilities of its heroine Katniss, who becomes known as "the girl on fire." Katniss also represents a girl who is coming of age. In this sense, the film could be called a bildungsroman, which is a genre that is completely opposite of "The Lottery." "The Lottery" is sheer over-the-top satire. The Hunger Games does not set out to ridicule and poke fun at human nature but highlight its good points in an increasingly demented and dystopian world. Katniss is admired for her the qualities she shows, not ridiculed for her faults. The film looks at human nature just as "The Lottery" does, but it does so in softer and gentler way (despite the darker context in which the narrative is situated). For example, as Katniss is being dressed for the Games, she says to Cinna, "So you're here to make me look pretty," with what is meant to be a sarcastic jab. Cinna replies with empathy and sympathy, "I'm here to help you make an impression." It is a moment of human contact and bonding that sets the Hunger Games in a completely different tone from "The Lottery."
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.