¶ … international student fancy words if . Thanks This completed time !!! Document III, written by Mark Twain (also known as Samuel Clemens) provides readers with the opportunity to look at the event from the narrator's perspective. Clemens provides harsh criticism with regard to the way that the military conducted itself in those circumstances and seems to introduce a form of satire in the discussion with the purpose of emphasizing the tragic nature of events occurring there. The writer wanted to take people's attention away from information it saw in public reports in order to actually be able to understand the degree to which the U.S. army had harmed natives.

The Moro Crater massacre involved a military unit sent by the U.S. authorities to attack a village on Jolo island, the Philippines. Clemens intention in writing the document was to highlight the degree to which those in power were determined to succeed from a material point-of-view. The writer's membership in the American Anti-Imperialist League was essential...

He was seriously opposed to the American involvement in the Philippines and wanted to do everything in his power in order to discourage such behaviors. Clemens' experience as a writer enabled him to use his abilities with the purpose of denouncing the U.S.' interest in persecuting other nations. Clemens was, in general, against warfare, and wanted to have the masses understand the degree to which the process harmed society as a whole.
Clemens obviously considered that society contemporary to him had a limited understanding of the idea of life and an even more limited understanding of the idea's importance to the world. By describing the way that events unfolded on the isle of Jolo on March 10, 1906, Clemens intended to make readers better prepared to deal with the government's tendency to achieve its goals regardless of the suffering it provoked. Moreover, the writer wanted people to know that the authorities put across such behaviors while trying to get the masses to support them by portraying them as actions that were actually beneficial for the nation. The government practically took people's attention away from things that actually mattered and made them feel as if those in charge were actually concerned about the world's well-being. "The official report quite properly extolled and magnified the "heroism" and "gallantry" of our troops; lamented the loss of the fifteen who perished, and elaborated the wounds of thirty-two of our men who suffered injury, and even minutely and faithfully described the nature of the wounds, in the interest of future…