Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Stanley Fish blurs the distinction between subject and object, between subjectivity and objectivity, in his essay "How to Recognize a Poem When You See One." Using an anecdote from his classroom, Fish notes that when students expect to be reading poetry, they begin to infer meaning and structure where there were none. These fallacies of interpretation show how human communication is a predefined, agreed-upon system. The contents of our consciousness are not as free as we would like to think, argues Fish. There is no "unconstrained self" that can freely interpret the universe. Rather, we buy into a "structure of interests and understood goals" that underlie every human interaction or communication.
Fish shows how easily and often we take for granted the inherent meanings of words or gestures. For example, he notes that when students raise their hands we automatically understand that gesture to mean permission to speak. Another culture would perceive that same gesture differently, proving that no symbol is truly universal or pure. The author's argument is insightful, validating the nature of culturally-created symbols and consciousness.
Most readers would easily understand what Fish means by the constraints of the "system" we all buy into. As the author notes, "all objects are made and not found." The Fish essay is valuable insofar as it brings to light many of the cognitions we take for granted in our daily lives. Every type of communication we engage in: whether written or verbal, proves Fish's point that the structure and content of what we read is co-created by ourselves. The crux of Fish's argument is highly empowering, showing that works of art and literature may not have the absolute meanings many scholars claim them to have. Readers, listeners, and viewers all interpret works of art in their own ways, based on their background and their perception of the particular form at hand.
Communication Media Assertive Communicators Communication is a course of action in which the information, ideas, thoughts, feelings, emotions, opinions and knowledge are exchanged between two or more people. This meaningful interaction can be in the form of speech, signals, writing, or behavior. This two-way interaction is an integral process not only in the on a daily basis but is equally significant at the workplace, as it helps elevating the communication gap (Wood
Communication Verbal communication includes the words that are physically spoken, as well as factors, according to the video, such as tone of voice, rhythm of speaking, word choice, and emphasis. Experts and researchers in the field of communication assert that nonverbal communication composes more than half of the communication among people. Nonverbal communication has a variety of factors such as eye contact, gestures, body language, the setting, and even the dress
Communication Skills Self-Assessment Interpersonal Communication Speech and language pathologists are considered to be experts in the field of interpersonal communication. Yet these professionals readily agree that although they may be experts in disorders of communication, they "are not experts in 'communication,' particularly that of interpersonal communication" (Montgomery, 2006). A fundamental reason that someone might not be skilled in interpersonal communication is that they have difficulty attending to and processing all of the
Here, people always attribute causes to actions and happenings, with the belief that everything has an explanation only if we could look deeper enough (Changing Minds, 2011). This theory serves to show how people have very different perspectives to happenings or events in the daily lives, and these varying views can easily stray into power imbalance, prejudice and such like vices ultimately affecting the communication process. Under attribution theory, there
Al, (2008). With such events still expected, the lessons to be drawn from this case is that extensive cross-cultural consultation needs to be conducted among the representatives from both sides hence ensuring there is a cultural balance and no disregard for one culture. Timely, open and continuous communication needs to be fostered between the two sides as this will give chance to iron out the few differences that may emerge. References Bambacas, Mary
Communication The Hunter-Worth situation is an interesting example of cultural communication breakdown. In this instance, the breakdown has led to several problems. There is conflict between Hunter-Worth and the Mexican plant, and there is a shortage of the toy. The problems are related. The communication breakdown has resulted in Hunter-Worth management not knowing what the problem with the toy is. While Moore might not think so, resolving the conflict is going