Bernie Sanders's Economic Platform: Income Inequality & Policy
This paper examines Bernie Sanders's economic platform as presented during his Democratic primary campaign, with a focus on its central concern: income inequality and the erosion of the American middle class. The paper analyzes Sanders's proposed remedies, including large-scale federal infrastructure investment modeled on Keynesian economics, a minimum wage increase to $15 per hour, expanded Social Security and Medicaid benefits, and progressive taxation targeting wealthy individuals and corporations. It also considers his opposition to free trade agreements such as NAFTA, CAFTA, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and evaluates the core fiscal challenge his platform faces in financing its ambitious spending commitments.
- Introduction: The Central Thesis of Income Inequality: Sanders frames rising productivity against widening inequality
- Rebuilding the Middle Class Through Federal Investment: Federal jobs program and Keynesian infrastructure spending
- Minimum Wage, Social Security, and Benefits Expansion: Wage increases and expanded social safety net proposals
- Financing the Platform: Taxation and Revenue Sources: Progressive taxes and closing corporate loopholes
- Trade Policy and Domestic Manufacturing: Opposition to free trade deals and protecting U.S. jobs
- Conclusion: Promises, Costs, and Fiscal Challenges: Fiscal sustainability concerns and budget deficit risks
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper maintains a clear analytical thread throughout, consistently returning to the question of how each policy proposal addresses income inequality and what it costs.
- It situates Sanders's proposals within a recognizable economic tradition (Keynesian economics and the New Deal), giving readers conceptual context without over-explaining.
- The paper raises a genuine critical tension — the gap between ambitious spending commitments and plausible financing — rather than simply listing platform points.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates policy analysis through a cost-benefit framing: for each major proposal, it identifies both the intended social outcome and the fiscal mechanism required to achieve it. This dual-lens approach — what does it do, and how does it get paid for — is a standard technique in political economy essays and keeps the argument grounded rather than purely descriptive.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing Sanders's core ideological premise (income inequality amid rising productivity), then moves through specific policy areas in logical order: job creation, wage policy, benefits expansion, taxation, and trade. It closes by returning to the overarching fiscal question, creating a circular argumentative structure that bookends the analysis effectively. Each section builds on the previous, maintaining coherence across a multi-topic platform.
Introduction: The Central Thesis of Income Inequality
Bernie Sanders's economic platform is built on the concept of income inequality. As a democratic socialist, his central thesis is that the U.S. economy is generating wealth while simultaneously producing large and growing income disparities. His platform explores a striking dichotomy: despite continuous increases in economic productivity over the years and despite tremendous advances in technology — advances that should theoretically reduce economic disparities — workers are compelled to work longer hours for the same or lower wages.
Sanders's approach is more complex than simply emphasizing economic gaps. He frames his platform around a transfer of wealth, not merely the existence of wealth disparities, between the middle class and the rich. Since the United States was historically built around the proliferation of a prosperous middle class, this ongoing transfer is presented as a matter of serious concern for voters. Sanders also gives particular emphasis to child poverty, noting that the U.S., according to UNICEF data, has the highest child poverty rate among developed nations — 32.2%, compared to 25.6% in the United Kingdom, the second-highest on that list.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.