Cannabis Legalization in Canada: Public Health and Policy
This research paper proposes a study examining the anticipated effects of full cannabis legalization in Canada across public health, legal, and humanitarian dimensions. Drawing on existing literature, the paper argues that legalization would yield net positive outcomes: reducing harm caused by prohibition, diminishing the black market's influence, and expanding civil liberties. Because no longitudinal data yet exists from comparable nations, the paper proposes a mixed-methods study surveying and interviewing professionals from the Canadian Psychological Association, Canadian Public Health Association, and Canadian Bar Association. The paper reviews health evidence, legal and political ramifications, and harm reduction frameworks, concluding that evidence-based policy informed by qualified professionals could guide Canada—and potentially other nations—toward a more rational and humane approach to cannabis regulation.
- Introduction and Hypothesis: Context for Canadian cannabis use and legalization hypothesis
- Health Implications of Cannabis Legalization: Health evidence for and against cannabis legalization
- Legal and Political Ramifications: Criminal justice, civil liberties, and global treaty impacts
- Harm Reduction Frameworks: Policy strategies to minimize harms of legalization
- Proposed Research Design and Methods: Mixed-methods study surveying three professional associations
- Ethical Concerns and Limitations: Anonymity protections, validity constraints, and future use
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its hypothesis in a well-organized literature review that spans health, legal, political, and harm-reduction dimensions, giving it breadth without losing focus.
- The proposed methodology is specific and credible: named professional associations, defined sample sizes, Likert-scale instruments, and a rationale for each cohort's distinct question set.
- The paper openly acknowledges its limitations—low external validity, proprietary instruments, and the absence of comparable longitudinal data—demonstrating intellectual honesty that strengthens the argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies a research proposal structure: it synthesizes existing literature to identify a gap, articulates a testable hypothesis, and then designs a mixed-methods study to fill that gap. The transition from literature review to proposed methods is logically tight, with each literature section directly informing the survey questions posed to the corresponding professional cohort.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with context and a hypothesis, then moves through two themed literature review sections (health; legal and political), followed by a harm-reduction synthesis. A proposed research overview explains the study's rationale, while the methods section details sampling, instrumentation, and interview design for three professional groups. The paper closes with ethical concerns and limitations before a full reference list.
Introduction and Hypothesis
Canada boasts one of the highest cannabis usage rates in the world in spite of prohibition (Fischer, Kuganesan, & Room, 2015). Cannabis is also the most widely used illegal drug in the country by a wide margin (Hajizadeh, 2016). The complete decriminalization of cannabis in Canada would be unlikely to have any appreciable effect on raising rates of usage, except potentially an initial spark of interest following the lifting of prohibition. Unfortunately, a dearth of literature exists on the actual effects of decriminalization, given that the phenomenon had yet to occur and that there were few case studies from other countries at the time of this writing. The only country in the world to have outright legalized marijuana was Uruguay; several other countries maintained relatively relaxed policies toward the drug, but Canada's proposal to fully legalize would be revolutionary. This research can potentially contribute to the growing understanding of what consequences might arise from the legalization of cannabis in Canada.
Hypothesis: Fully legalizing cannabis in Canada would lead to public health benefits for all age cohorts, a more humanitarian approach to drug use, reductions in organized crime, and enhanced civil liberties for all Canadians.
Health Implications of Cannabis Legalization
The Liberal government under Prime Minister Trudeau made a statement confirming its commitment to legalizing cannabis, on the grounds that prohibition had not worked, that Canadians use the drug anyway, and that criminalization leads to gross human rights violations and violations of civil liberties (Lopez, 2016). Public acceptance of legalization reflects general acceptance of recreational marijuana use. The Government of Canada conducted a study showing not only that prohibition does not work, but also that most Canadians no longer supported the existing criminalization of cannabis and were ready for a change. The report addresses the fact that organized crime is the primary beneficiary of prohibition, with billions of dollars in profits reaped from selling marijuana alone (Government of Canada, n.d.). The war on drugs model has also led to the unnecessary incarceration of nonviolent drug offenders. Legalization is therefore viewed as having a projected net positive effect on Canadian society.
Research on the potential health effects of marijuana legalization is varied, but personal and public health remains the primary area of research interest. Some caution that legalization may lead to increased use, but that any potential increase in usage would easily be offset by the fact that a more widely available cannabis supply may divert users from more dangerous substances like opioids (Lake & Kerr, 2016). Cannabis is widely considered in the literature to be a relatively safe and soft drug, not linked to any known overdoses, and associated with only indirect negative effects such as impaired driving. Research has also shown that cannabis has clear health benefits, which is why many U.S. states have medical marijuana programs and why Canada has maintained a medical marijuana program as well.
There is a low to moderate link between cannabis use and vehicle collisions, though this indicates that the danger is not a significant factor in the decision-making process around legalization (Lake & Kerr, 2016). Other potential adverse health effects from cannabis use—including lung cancer due to excessive smoking or impacts on mood disorders—can be mitigated through directly targeted interventions funded by tax revenues raised via legalization (Hajizadeh, 2016).
Because of prohibition, the overall health effects of legalization remained largely unknown. However, empirical experimental studies had revealed promising trends. There is now a "great deal of consensus within the scientific community that cannabis is comparatively safer than a host of other commonly abused substances," many of which are legal, including alcohol (Lake & Kerr, 2016).
The potentially harmful effects of legalization on children are discussed in some research. Although it is impossible to know in advance what the full ramifications of legalization might be, it is already certain that Canada has the highest rate of cannabis use among teens and children, with as many as 28% of Canadians between the ages of 11 and 15 having used the drug within the past year (Hajizadeh, 2016). Perhaps the discourse on legalization needs to reframe the issue: young people are already using cannabis. Their use reflects general social trends, and the greatest risk posed to young people is not legalization but criminalization, given that young people who use cannabis are buying it on the black market. Their exposure to black market distribution systems can be more harmful than their potentially obtaining government-tested and regulated cannabis (Hajizadeh, 2016). Legally tested and regulated cannabis would also foreseeably be safer in the sense that users would know exactly what they were purchasing. Legalization of cannabis could also pave the way for the legalization of other drugs, thereby diminishing the black market's stranglehold on mind-altering substances and making those substances and their distribution methods safer for all Canadians.
Legal and Political Ramifications
Although Canada does not face the prison overcrowding humanitarian crisis evident in the United States, criminalization can still be framed as a human rights affront. The Government of Canada (n.d.) acknowledges that thousands of Canadians are burdened with unnecessary criminal records for nonviolent offences each year. The research clearly shows that legalization of cannabis would lead to reductions in drug-related sentencing. Questions that may arise in future research include how to address the sentences of already incarcerated individuals and whether it would be a humanitarian step to commute those sentences.
The political ramifications of legalization may be far more complicated than the legal ones. The American-driven war on drugs has become a global endeavor requiring a "series of treaties" between nations that enforce the prohibition framework through security measures and anti-trafficking efforts (Lopez, 2016). The ramifications of Canada legalizing cannabis are truly global in scope and may produce a domino effect whereby other nations party to the prohibition treaty also begin to opt out of their obligations, ushering in a new era in which cannabis is treated more sensibly (Lopez, 2016).
Research consistently shows that legalization will harm organized crime (Hajizadeh, 2016). Legalization of cannabis could therefore allow law enforcement to redirect attention toward organized crime syndicates rather than focusing on low-level users and distributors. Furthermore, legalization would free up resources currently devoted to the war on drugs, channeling those funds into counterterrorism and other worthwhile priorities.
References
Fischer, B., Kuganesan, S., & Room, R. (2015). Medical marijuana programs: Implications for cannabis control policy—Observations from Canada. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26(1), 15–19.
Government of Canada (n.d.). Toward the legalization, regulation, and restriction of access to marijuana [Discussion paper]. Retrieved from http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/health-system-systeme-sante/consultations/legalization-marijuana-legalisation/alt/legalization-marijuana-legalisation-eng.pdf
Hajizadeh, M. (2016). Legalizing and regulating marijuana in Canada: Review of potential economic, social, and health impacts. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 5(8), 453–456.
Hall, W., & Lynskey, M. (2016). Why it is probably too soon to assess the public health effects of legalisation of recreational cannabis use in the USA. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(3), 900–906.
Joffe, A., & Yancy, W. S. (2004). Legalization of marijuana: Potential impact on youth. Pediatrics, 113(6). Available from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/113/6/e632.full
Lake, S., & Kerr, T. (2016). The challenges of projecting the public health impacts of marijuana legalization in Canada: Comment on "Legalizing and Regulating Marijuana in Canada." International Journal of Health Policy Management, 5(x), 1–3. Available from http://ijhpm.com/article_3271_27f1e7e462d150835fbda57a5a0d031f.pdf
Lopez, G. (2016). Canada's Justin Trudeau may legalize marijuana. That could impact U.S. drug policy. Vox. Retrieved from http://www.vox.com/2015/10/20/9573497/canada-marijuana-legalization-justin-trudeau
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.