Hispanic Student Graduation Rates at Community College: A Study
This paper presents a doctoral prospectus investigating the problem of low graduation rates among Hispanic minority students at a California community college. Despite high reported student satisfaction, only 32 percent of students complete their courses on time, with Hispanic students graduating at rates well below both Caucasian peers and state averages. The prospectus outlines the institutional profile, defines key terms such as student persistence, retention, and time-to-degree, and details a mixed-methods research design that combines online surveys, semi-structured interviews with student leaders, and document review. Ten structured interview questions are presented and justified, targeting academic preparedness, financial support, sense of belonging, faculty-student relationships, and family background as potential factors influencing timely degree completion.
- Introduction and Institutional Overview: College profile, mission, demographics, and structure
- The Graduation Rate Problem and Its Significance: Equity gap data and multi-stakeholder impact analysis
- Purpose Statement and Research Design: Mixed-methods approach: surveys, interviews, document review
- Key Definitions: Definitions of persistence, retention, time-to-degree, and more
- Interview and Data Collection Procedures: Sampling strategy, interview format, and thematic analysis steps
- Interview Questions and Rationale: Ten annotated questions targeting graduation barriers
- References: APA-formatted source list
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The prospectus grounds its problem statement in concrete institutional data, citing the 2019 California Community Colleges Student Success Scorecard to contrast Hispanic (36.1%) and Caucasian (60.6%) completion rates, making the equity gap immediately visible.
- Each interview question is followed by a detailed rationale explaining what evidence it targets and how responses will inform analysis — a strong model of purposeful instrument design.
- The significance section addresses multiple stakeholders (students, families, institutions, and the national workforce), demonstrating breadth of impact beyond a single institutional concern.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates mixed-methods instrument justification — explaining not just what data will be collected but why each method (survey, semi-structured interview, document review) is appropriate for the research context. The choice of semi-structured interviews, for instance, is defended by contrasting the limitations of both fully structured and fully unstructured formats, showing methodological reasoning rather than arbitrary design.
Structure breakdown
The prospectus opens with an organizational profile that situates the study site, moves into a problem introduction with supporting statistics, then presents the significance of the research across individual, institutional, and societal levels. A purpose statement outlines the mixed-methods design, followed by a definitions section and a detailed Chapter Three covering interview procedures, sampling rationale, thematic analysis steps, and ten annotated interview questions. The paper closes with a formatted reference list.
Introduction and Institutional Overview
The purpose of this study is to provide recommendations to address the problem of low graduation rates among Hispanic students at a public community college in Glendale, California. The problem is that despite high levels of student satisfaction at the institution, only 32 percent of students complete their courses on time (Community College Review, 2022). This introduction is organized into an organizational profile, which describes the project site, and an introduction to the problem, which outlines the scope of the issue.
Organizational Profile
The study's educational site is a public community college (referred to here as GCC) offering certificate and associate-level degrees in Los Angeles County, California (GCC, 2022). GCC was established in 1926 to provide vocational and academic instruction to the people of Glendale, La Crescenta, and Tujunga who lacked access to higher education (GCC, "About GCC," 2022). The overall mission of GCC is to assist students in realizing their informed educational goals through comprehensive instructional programs and student services (GCC, 2022).
GCC offers programs in four areas: basic foundation education in mathematics, writing, reading, and English as a second language to enhance college-level success; general education to promote self-development and help students lead meaningful lives; technical and career education to support job advancement or employment; and post-secondary preparation to help students transition to four-year universities (GCC, 2022). The institution commits to the values of open communication, equity, inclusion, collaboration, transparency in decision-making, innovation, and democratic governance (GCC, 2022). It also offers financial and career counseling, as well as distance education programs to help students accomplish their learning goals efficiently (GCC, 2022).
The college is highly diverse. Caucasians make up 52 percent of the student population, followed by Latino Hispanics at 25 percent (GCC, "College Profile," 2022). African Americans and Asians make up approximately 20 percent of the student body (GCC, "College Profile," 2022). Approximately 55 percent of students are female, and most (38 percent) are working toward obtaining an associate degree and transferring to a four-year institution (GCC, "College Profile," 2022).
The institution employs 1,074 staff, including 63 administrators, 204 full-time faculty, 485 adjunct faculty, and 322 classified staff (GCC, "College Profile," 2022). It is headed by a president/superintendent assisted by four vice presidents and an administrative dean (GCC, "Administration," 2022). The vice presidents — overseeing Administrative Services, Instructional Services, Student Services, and Human Resources — are supported by Deans, Associate Deans, and Program Managers (GCC, "Administration," 2022). Major decisions must be approved by the six-member board of trustees (GCC, "Administration," 2022).
The Graduation Rate Problem and Its Significance
Introduction to the Problem
The central problem at GCC is that, on average, only 32 percent of students complete their courses and graduate on time (Community College Review, 2022). According to the 2019 Student Success Scorecard produced by the California Community Colleges Board of Governors, timely graduation rates are lowest among Hispanic students, who form the focus of this study. Data from 2019 indicates that 60.6 percent of Caucasian students completed their certificate or degree-related outcomes, compared to only 36.1 percent of Hispanic students (California Community Colleges, 2019). Statewide data indicates a completion rate of 42 percent for Hispanic students, showing that GCC ranks below the state average in Hispanic student completion relative to other racial groups (California Community Colleges, 2019b).
To address the problem of low graduation rates, GCC has previously conducted satisfaction surveys to gather students' views on campus climate and actions that could enhance retention. In the 2019 survey, 93.9 percent of students reported satisfaction with campus climate and 96 percent believed the instructional programs were high quality; yet only 68 percent believed they were progressing toward their educational goals as quickly as possible (GCC, "Student Satisfaction," 2022). More recently, GCC began offering distance learning modalities and academic counseling programs to improve retention and ensure timely course completion. Despite these efforts, the institution has continued to report low graduation rates among Hispanic students.
Studies have shown that delayed college completion increases the risk of dropping out and results in lower post-college earnings (Witteveen & Attewell, 2021). GCC's stated mission is to help students live meaningful lives and realize their best potential in the global community (GCC, "Mission, Vision," 2022). The effects of delayed college completion directly inhibit this mission, making it imperative to identify and address the underlying factors.
Significance of the Research
Studies have shown that delayed college graduation affects employment prospects and reduces post-college earnings by between 8 and 15 percent, as employers tend to use delays as a proxy for lower ability (Casalone & Aina, 2011; Witteveen & Attewell, 2021). For students, reducing time-to-degree may increase employment chances and open avenues for higher post-college wages (Witteveen & Attewell, 2021). Moreover, delayed time-to-degree is associated with higher tuition costs and a greater risk of losing financial aid (Casalone & Aina, 2011). For families, timely graduation may prevent unforeseen financial burdens, particularly when a student who has exceeded the expected timeframe loses financial aid and must find alternative funding.
For institutions, delayed graduation increases the risk of non-completion, which affects how potential applicants perceive the college, creating reputational concerns that hinder effective recruitment (Aina et al., 2019). The findings of this research may provide crucial insights to institutional policymakers on the factors contributing to delayed graduation and strategies for addressing them. High graduation rates, in turn, may yield better college ratings, a stronger reputation, and improved ability to attract students (Aina et al., 2019).
At the national level, delayed graduation denies the workforce the skills and human capital that students would contribute post-graduation (Aina et al., 2019). Identifying the factors that hinder timely college graduation may ensure that the broader workforce benefits from the additional skills students provide upon completing their degrees, contributing to higher labor productivity and increased national revenues (Aina et al., 2019). This research is also timely because, while a substantial body of literature exists on barriers to timely graduation, most studies focus on four-year colleges, leaving community colleges relatively understudied. The standards and contexts of community colleges differ significantly from those of four-year institutions, and findings may not be generalizable across both settings.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.