Bridging Language Proficiency and Academic Achievement in ELL
This paper examines the relationship between second language acquisition and academic achievement, drawing on Krashen's theory of comprehensible input and Gottlieb's framework for assessing English language learners (ELLs). It explores the developmental continuum of language acquisition, the psychological variables that influence learning, and practical classroom strategies educators can use to support ELLs simultaneously in language development and subject-matter mastery. The paper also emphasizes the importance of low-anxiety, qualitative assessment methods that mirror instructional strategies, arguing that a thorough understanding of the distinction between social and academic language proficiency is essential for effective teaching in diverse classrooms.
- Introduction: Language Proficiency and Academic Achievement: Framing the dual challenge of language and academic development
- Krashen's Universal Approach to Language Acquisition: Universal cognitive basis for predictable language acquisition stages
- Comprehensible Input and Classroom Strategy: Using comprehensible input to bridge language and academic learning
- Assessment Methods for English Language Learners: Low-anxiety, qualitative assessments mirroring instructional strategies
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates two complementary theoretical sources — Krashen's acquisition theory and Gottlieb's assessment framework — and applies them directly to classroom practice, demonstrating applied synthesis rather than mere summary.
- It maintains a clear throughline from theory (how language is acquired) to practice (comprehensible input strategies) to evaluation (low-anxiety, qualitative assessment), giving the argument a logical progression.
- Specific pedagogical recommendations, such as not calling on silent students and using images and gestures as comprehensible inputs, ground abstract concepts in concrete classroom actions.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective source integration: rather than treating each author separately, it weaves Krashen and Gottlieb together to build a unified argument about the relationship between language development and academic success. Direct quotations are used sparingly and purposefully, supporting claims without displacing the writer's own voice.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by framing the central challenge — developing language proficiency and academic achievement simultaneously. It then surveys Krashen's universal acquisition model, moves into the role of comprehensible input and classroom environment, and closes with a discussion of assessment approaches that align with instructional strategies. Each section builds on the last, creating a coherent argument rather than a list of disconnected points.
Introduction: Language Proficiency and Academic Achievement
Second language proficiency and academic achievement can be challenging to develop simultaneously. Krashen's (2010) work illustrates the various systems of learning, including learning that takes place subconsciously and learning that occurs through rote methods. Likewise, Gottlieb (2006) differentiates between social and academic language proficiency and academic achievement for students. The acquisition of language entails different cognitive processes than the acquisition of subject-specific knowledge. Educators armed with a more thorough understanding of academic versus language proficiency can better help their students succeed on both levels.
Krashen's Universal Approach to Language Acquisition
Krashen (2010) points out that each human being learns language in the same way. Individual differences may be important for current scientific paradigms, but for educators, a more universal approach will be far more helpful in creating a classroom environment and pedagogical approach that is effective. After all, human biology is universal, and so too are the cognitive processes involved in language acquisition. According to Gottlieb (2006), second language acquisition occurs along a "predictable" set of developmental stages (p. 26). Those developmental stages occur along a continuum. Educators can "arbitrarily" divide the continuum into levels for the express purpose of crafting classroom exercises. Given the vast increase in English language learners (ELLs) in Nebraska and elsewhere, it is critical that instructional methods become more effective by recognizing the continuum of language acquisition and academic success.
References
Gottlieb, M. (2006). Assessing English language learners. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Krashen, S. (2010). On language acquisition. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiTsduRreug
"Nebraska: ELL Resources." (n.d.). Colorín Colorado. Retrieved from http://www.colorincolorado.org/ell-basics/resources-state/nebraska
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.