Minority Student Graduation Rates: A Literature Review
This literature review examines the factors contributing to low graduation rates among minority students at the community college level. Drawing on peer-reviewed studies, the review identifies and analyzes four categories of influence: academic factors (GPA and academic discipline), institutional factors (staffing quality and school climate), individual factors (age and gender), and socioeconomic factors (financial aid and employment). The review reveals a knowledge gap in community college-specific research, as most existing literature focuses on four-year universities. Findings suggest that higher GPAs, strong faculty-to-student ratios, supportive school climates, younger student age, access to financial aid, and a sense of belonging all contribute positively to timely graduation among minority students.
- Overview: Problem statement and review scope introduced
- Academic Factors Influencing College Completion: GPA and academic discipline effects on graduation
- Institutional Factors Influencing College Completion: Staffing quality and school climate findings
- Individual Factors Influencing College Completion: Age and gender as demographic completion predictors
- Socioeconomic Factors Influencing College Completion: Financial aid and employment impacts on graduation
- Summary and Knowledge Gap: Community college research gap identified
- References: Cited sources listed in APA format
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review is well-organized into four clearly delineated thematic categories — academic, institutional, individual, and socioeconomic — giving readers a logical framework for understanding a complex, multi-causal problem.
- The paper consistently compares findings across multiple studies, noting agreements and contextual discrepancies, which demonstrates critical engagement with the literature rather than simple summarization.
- The author explicitly identifies a knowledge gap — that most existing research focuses on four-year universities rather than community colleges — providing a clear rationale for the proposed study.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of comparative synthesis: when two studies reach different conclusions (e.g., Almenaie vs. Guzman et al. on academic discipline; Almenaie vs. Margarit & Kennedy on gender), the author does not simply report both findings but offers a plausible explanation for the discrepancy, typically attributing differences to contextual or cultural variation. This move — acknowledging and explaining contradictions — is a hallmark of rigorous literature review writing at the graduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview that establishes the problem and scope. It then moves through four themed literature sections, each with a brief introductory sentence and two subsections supported by specific citations. The review closes by acknowledging the gap between existing university-focused research and community college contexts, justifying the proposed study. The structure mirrors a standard academic literature review: introduction → thematic synthesis → gap identification → implications.
Overview
This proposed research study seeks to address the problem of low graduation rates among minority students at the community college level. Annual graduation rates indicate that, on average, only 32 percent of minority students complete their courses and graduate on time each year (Community College Review, 2022). The proposed study's findings are intended to contribute to increasing minority students' retention rates and improving overall graduation rates. This literature review presents the related literature, theoretical framework, and summary for the proposed research.
Academic Factors Influencing College Completion
This section reviews education-related factors influencing student retention in higher education, focusing specifically on Grade Point Average (GPA) and academic discipline.
In a Saudi Arabia-based study, Almenaie (2018) found a significant, positive association between GPA and timely completion, concluding that students with higher GPAs were more likely to graduate on time. These findings mirror those of Guzman et al. (2021), who also found that students with higher course averages graduated earlier than those with lower averages. Students with lower course averages may have additional units or examinations to retake, causing them to spend longer in school before completing their degrees.
Almenaie (2018) also found that students enrolled in medicine or science-related courses were more likely to graduate on time than those enrolled in the humanities. However, Guzman et al. (2021) found that academic discipline itself had no significant effect on the likelihood of completion. The only significant factor in that study was whether the student was satisfied with the course they were taking (Guzman et al., 2021). The differences in findings may be attributed to contextual variation, as the two studies were conducted in different countries.
Institutional Factors Influencing College Completion
This section reviews organizational factors that influence college completion rates, examining research related to staffing and school climate.
Srairi (2021) found a significant positive relationship between staff quality and students' completion rates in Tunisian universities. Staff quality was measured by the proportion of full professors relative to the total number of university staff. Similarly, Afable et al. (2022) found a significant negative relationship between completion rates and the student-to-staff ratio. High staff quality and a low student-to-staff ratio increase individualized attention, making students more likely to graduate on time.
Okwuduba et al. (2022) found that students' completion rates depended on how effectively the school climate created a sense of belonging. Other studies corroborated this finding, with empirical analyses showing that the availability of on-campus accommodation (Scott & Castles, 2017; Guzman et al., 2021), self-advocacy opportunities (Fleming et al., 2017), supplemental instruction programs (Bengesai & Paideya, 2018), and service-learning initiatives (Hungo, 2017; Morris-Matthews et al., 2020) all enhanced students' sense of belonging and resulted in higher completion rates. These findings collectively underscore the importance of school climate as a driver of academic persistence.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.