NYPD Stop-and-Frisk Policy: Racial Impacts and Statistics
This paper evaluates the NYPD's stop-and-frisk policy, which authorizes officers to stop and search pedestrians on the basis of reasonable suspicion. Drawing on data compiled by the New York Civil Liberties Union from 2003 to 2015, the paper documents the policy's peak in 2011—when 685,724 stops were recorded—and its subsequent decline. It examines the policy's negative impacts, including police brutality, sexual harassment, psychological harm, and public humiliation, alongside its claimed crime-reduction benefits. The paper's central focus is the pronounced racial disparity in stops: African Americans consistently accounted for roughly 54% of all stops and Latinos for approximately 30–32%, despite both groups representing minorities of the city's population. The paper concludes that the policy disproportionately burdens communities of color.
- Introduction: Overview of stop-and-frisk policy scope and controversy
- Impact of the NYPD Stop-and-Frisk Policy: Legal basis and general harms of the policy
- Sexual Harassment and Police Brutality: Accounts of inappropriate touching and excessive force
- Psychological and Social Consequences: Fear, trauma, and crime-rate data examined together
- Statistical Racial Impacts of the Policy: Data showing disproportionate stops of Black and Latino residents
- Conclusion: Summary of policy harms and racial targeting findings
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses concrete statistical data from the New York Civil Liberties Union across more than a decade to support claims of racial disparity, making the argument empirically grounded rather than purely anecdotal.
- Balances both sides of the debate by acknowledging the policy's crime-reduction benefits (declining murder and robbery rates) before returning to its discriminatory application, lending the argument credibility.
- Grounds legal claims in specific statutory authority (Section 140.50, New York Criminal Procedure Law), anchoring the policy discussion in its legal framework.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of comparative tabular data to drive a policy argument. By presenting year-by-year stop counts broken down by race alongside innocence rates, the author transforms raw figures into a coherent narrative about systemic disparity — a technique central to quantitative social-science writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction that establishes scope and context, then moves into the policy's general impacts (physical, emotional, and social), followed by a focused section on sexual harassment and police brutality. A distinct section addresses psychological consequences alongside crime-rate trends. The statistical racial-disparity section forms the analytical core, supported by two data tables. A short conclusion synthesizes the findings. The reference list includes peer-reviewed journal articles, a NYCLU dataset, and a newspaper source.
Introduction
The NYPD stop-and-frisk policy is a practice introduced by New York City mandating police officers to stop pedestrians and frisk them for contraband and weapons. The relevant rules are codified in Section 140.50 of the New York Criminal Procedure Law. In 2011, the New York Police Department used the policy to stop approximately 685,724 people; however, that number fell sharply to 22,939 by 2015. The policy has become a highly controversial issue because over five million people were frisked during the first decade after its introduction. Reported stops numbered 685,724 in 2011 before declining to 533,042 in 2012.
The stated goal of the stop-and-frisk policy is to reduce violent crime and keep guns off the street in order to improve the quality of life for New Yorkers. New York City administrators have argued that the policy contributed to a substantial reduction in crime rates over the past two decades. Despite these claimed benefits, large percentages of those stopped and frisked are African Americans and Latinos. Moreover, only 5.9% of people frisked in 2011 resulted in an arrest, and just 2% led to a weapon recovery.
The objective of this paper is to evaluate the impact of the NYPD stop-and-frisk policy and examine the statistical racial impact of that policy.
Impact of the NYPD Stop-and-Frisk Policy
Stop and frisk is a New York police practice of stopping and searching individuals in public. Under the law, a police officer has no right to stop an individual for a search without substantial proof or reasonable suspicion that the person is engaging in, or is about to engage in, criminal activity. However, frisking is legally permitted in New York where officers believe a person is dangerous or armed. New York state law requires officers to use a standardized form to record the reason for each stop. Within ten years of its adoption, the stop-and-frisk policy grew at an astonishing rate, reaching its peak in 2010.
Stops and frisks have a profound impact on individuals, including abusive behavior by officers, inappropriate touching, people being forcibly stripped of clothing in public, sexual harassment, extortion of sexual favors, and other degrading and humiliating treatment. While nine out of ten stops and frisks do not result in an arrest, all people subjected to the practice must cope with the psychological, emotional, and social trauma that can follow.
References
Gelman, A., Fagan, J., & Kiss, A. (2007). An analysis of the New York City Police Department's "stop-and-frisk" policy in the context of claims of racial bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(479), 813–823.
Kalhan, A. (2014). Stop and frisk, judicial independence, and the ironies of improper appearances. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 27(4).
Loren, G. S. (2014). Stop and frisk: An historical answer to a modern problem. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 58(4), 532.
NYCLU. (2016). Stop-and-frisk data. New York Civil Liberties Union.
Wendy, R. (2012). For women in street stops, deeper humiliation. New York Times.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.