Literature Review Undergraduate 1,652 words

Time Management Research: Literature Review and Synthesis

~9 min read 6 sections Psychology

Abstract

This literature review synthesizes three publications on time management: Britton and Tesser's (1991) empirical study linking time management habits to college GPA, Macan's (1994) process-model study examining workplace training outcomes, and Spidal's (2009) practical guide for individual self-assessment. The paper compares each author's research questions, populations, and methodologies, noting areas of overlap and divergence. While Britton and Tesser found that short-term planning and time attitudes predicted academic achievement, Macan's results were mixed—training reduced workplace tension but did not consistently improve job performance. Spidal's self-help framework, meanwhile, offers practical applications that parallel the empirical findings, raising the question of how well academic research informs popular time management guidance.

Key Takeaways

Introduction: Overview of time management research and sources reviewed
Assertions and Overview: Each author's core claims about time management benefits
Research Questions: Motivating questions behind each study compared
Research Design and Methodology: Survey and data collection methods across studies
Criticism and Future Research: Limitations of self-help literature and gaps to address
Conclusion: Shared advocacy for time management across all sources

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

The paper clearly organizes its comparison across three distinct sources by moving systematically through their assertions, research questions, and methodologies, making the synthesis easy to follow.
It draws meaningful contrasts between empirical academic studies and practical self-help literature, demonstrating the student's awareness of different types of scholarly contribution.
The concluding observation — that it would be worth investigating how well academic research informs popular time management training — shows independent critical thinking beyond mere description.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates effective thematic synthesis: rather than summarizing each source in isolation, the student consistently groups all three authors under shared analytical categories (assertions, research questions, design). This approach reveals relationships among sources and is a hallmark of strong literature review writing at the undergraduate level.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a brief framing of time management research and introduces the three sources. It then moves through four main analytical sections — Assertions, Research Questions, Research Design, and Criticism/Future Research — treating each source comparatively within each section. A Works Cited list follows standard APA formatting. The structure is tightly organized and well-suited to a synthesis assignment.

📘 Read the full literature review guide → Generate citations → Build an outline → Draft a literature review → 📚 More Classroom examples →

Essay 1,652 words

Introduction

Psychologists have conducted research into the effectiveness of various time management techniques for organizing work and personal life. Time management is also a popular topic for self-help books, PowerPoint presentations, and instructional web videos (for example, Allen, 2001; Mann, 2007; McGhee, 2005; Spidal, 2009). The untested assertions found in some practical manuals provide testable hypotheses that psychologists can investigate empirically using controlled samples and statistical models. These researchers have found some popularly promoted time management advice to be supported by the evidence, while other recommendations have proven to be of questionable value.

This essay compares, contrasts, and synthesizes information presented in three publications on time management: Bruce K. Britton and Abraham Tesser (1991), Therese Hoff Macan (1994), and Debra Spidal (2009). Each of these authors approaches the problem from a different angle. Together, their work covers different populations and applies different models of time management. Ultimately, all three authors are advocates of using time management techniques to improve work efficiency, perform better in school, or enhance a subjective sense of confidence and self-efficacy.

Assertions and Overview

Two of the articles — the Britton and Tesser study and the Macan study — present empirical evidence for the value of time management, testing outcomes on populations that had either attended time management seminars or scored high on time management inventories. The third article, by Spidal, is not a statistical study comparing control groups; instead, it offers practical advice for individual self-assessment and the application of one's findings to improve personal time management.

Britton and Tesser focused their investigation on college students. They proposed that differences in time management habits among students account for significant differences in academic performance, as measured by grade point average (GPA).

Macan also ran statistical tests on comparable populations to examine practical outcomes resulting from different styles of time management. Rather than studying college students, Macan's research focused on adults employed at two government agencies — a correctional facility and a public social service agency. She was able to compare a sample group of workers who had received time management training to a control group of coworkers who had not. She found that time management training did have beneficial effects in reducing workplace tension, but not in increasing efficiency.

Spidal's article can be seen as the practical application of the kinds of time management techniques the other two studies found effective. Spidal elaborates on methods for self-evaluation relevant to improving personal time management. She proposes that these techniques will benefit anyone who has goals, helping people identify time-wasters and organize their schedules to accomplish objectives more efficiently.

Research Questions

Because the papers were written for different purposes and examined different populations, the questions motivating each paper were also different, though complementary. Britton and Tesser's central question was whether individual differences in how college students manage their time result in greater academic success, as measured by higher grades. They were able to demonstrate that some aspects of time management did contribute to school success. Specifically, the researchers showed that self-reports of time management were related to academic achievement. Their measures of Time Attitudes and Short-Term Planning together accounted for 21% of predictable variance in grades. As a control, they also compared college GPA to SAT scores and found that SAT scores accounted for only 4% of the variance, a nonsignificant result.

Macan's central question was whether the application of the "process model" of time management reduced work-related stress and improved job performance. The process model Macan discusses begins with time management training that gives workers specific strategies for setting goals and priorities, making lists and schedules, and cultivating a preference for being organized. After completing this training, workers should benefit from the perception that they have greater control over their time — a perception that should, in turn, reduce tension, enhance job satisfaction, and improve job performance.

Like Britton and Tesser, Macan found some empirical support for the benefits of time management. She found that training gave workers a sense of self-efficacy at work and reduced symptoms of psychological and somatic tension on the job. However, with regard to practical benefits, Macan's findings were mixed. Contrary to popular time management claims, she found that while prioritizing, goal-setting, and having a preference for organization enhanced respondents' perception of control over time, other strategies such as making lists and scheduling activities did not lead to perceptions of greater time control (p. 290).

Like Macan, Spidal is also concerned with self-assessment and subjective perceptions of budgeting and effectively managing time. Spidal's recommendations involve keeping a daily log for several days and noting one's activities throughout the day. Individuals keeping these logs are to record when they work efficiently, when their work is interrupted, what kinds of distractions regularly waste their time, and how often they look for misplaced items. Using this information, they can then organize their personal workspace and their priorities, deciding which activities to delete, defer, delegate, or delay.

Spidal's questions for each person's individual research include asking them to reflect on how many of their goals were accomplished on a given day, and if they were not, to consider why. Rather than statistically comparing populations that do or do not employ time management techniques, Spidal provides instructions on how to conduct individual self-research into one's current use of time. Her approach could readily be used in the type of training program that Macan evaluated in her questionnaires.

Spidal expects that keeping a time log will help people identify when they are most productive, raise their awareness of common interruptions, and help them better manage their personal time.

2 Sections Hidden · 410 words

Research Design and Methodology220 words

Britton and Tesser constructed their time management questionnaire to measure the degree to which students implemented components of a particular time management theory. The theory emphasizes "choosing goals and subgoals, prioritizing the goals, generating…

Criticism and Future Research190 words

The Spidal paper stands apart from the two statistical studies because it serves a different purpose. Britton and Tesser began their article by commenting on the anecdotal…

View Full Document

Conclusion

All three authors considered here are ultimately advocates of using time management techniques to improve efficiency, academic performance, or personal well-being. Together, their work suggests that structured approaches to managing time yield measurable benefits, whether in a college setting, a government workplace, or in one's personal daily routine. The empirical studies by Britton and Tesser and by Macan provide scientific grounding for claims that are often made informally in popular guides like Spidal's. At the same time, practical frameworks like Spidal's illustrate how research findings might be translated into accessible, actionable guidance for everyday use — an area where workplace productivity scholarship continues to develop.

Works Cited

Allen, D. (2001). Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity. New York: Viking.

Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405–410.

Macan, T. (1994). Time management: Test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 381–391.

Mann, M. (2007). Inbox Zero [Video]. Google Videos. video.google.com (accessed May 29, 2008).

McGhee, S. (2005). Take Back Your Life! Using Microsoft Outlook to Get Organized and Stay Organized. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.

Pausch, R. (2007). Time management [Video]. Google Videos. video.google.com (accessed May 29, 2008).

Spidal, D. (2009). Time management. Key Words, 17(1), 15.

Key Concepts in This Paper

Time Management Academic Achievement Process Model Short-Term Planning Self-Efficacy Empirical Research Workplace Training Time Attitudes Self-Help Literature GPA Prediction