Walt Disney Company CSR Strategy and Stakeholder Analysis
This paper examines the corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy of the Walt Disney Company through the lenses of Freeman's stakeholder theory and Porter and Kramer's shared value framework. It begins with an overview of Disney's history, global scope, and financial scale, then maps the company's key stakeholders using both narrow and wide definitions. The analysis evaluates Disney's existing CSR initiatives—including environmental conservation, community volunteerism, and diversity representation—while identifying gaps in worker rights and theme park safety. The paper concludes with an ethical implementation plan addressing the alligator safety crisis at Disney's Florida theme park, offering practical managerial recommendations grounded in the Josephson Institute's six pillars of character.
- Company Overview: Disney's history, global scale, and financial profile
- Stakeholder Mapping: Narrow and wide stakeholder categories applied to Disney
- Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy: Disney's CSR initiatives evaluated against academic frameworks
- CSR Gaps and Alternative Strategies: Worker rights, safety weaknesses, and proposed improvements
- Implementing an Ethical Plan: Ethical analysis of alligator safety crisis with recommendations
- Conclusion: Disney's path to stronger CSR reputation through responsible action
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the analysis in named academic frameworks — Freeman's stakeholder theory and Porter and Kramer's shared value model — applying each systematically to a real company rather than describing them in the abstract.
- Balances praise for Disney's CSR achievements with clear identification of specific weaknesses (worker rights, park safety), avoiding a one-sided assessment.
- Moves logically from description (company overview, stakeholder mapping) to evaluation (CSR analysis) to prescription (ethical implementation plan), giving the paper a coherent three-part arc.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied stakeholder analysis: it first defines the theoretical distinction between narrow and wide stakeholders (Freeman), then populates each category with Disney-specific actors and explains the reciprocal relationship each has with the firm. This two-level mapping — theory first, application second — is a reliable structure for any business ethics assignment that asks students to connect course concepts to a real organization.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a factual company profile (history, financials, global footprint), moves into stakeholder identification and classification, then evaluates Disney's published CSR performance against the Zadek and Porter-Kramer frameworks. A dedicated section identifies CSR gaps and proposes alternatives, and the paper closes with an ethical dilemma case study (alligator fatality) complete with barriers analysis and two concrete managerial recommendations. The bibliography follows standard academic format.
Company Overview
The Walt Disney Company began as a small cartoon studio in 1923. It produced its first sound-synchronized short five years later and its first full-color cartoon short in 1932, for which it received an Academy Award. From there the company catapulted to greatness with hits such as Snow White, Dumbo, and Pinocchio. Disney expanded into live-action production, television, theme parks, and global productions over the decades, with Walt Disney World among its major attractions. It grew the Disney Channel, merged with ABC in 1996, purchased Pixar in 2006, acquired Marvel Entertainment in 2009, and acquired LucasFilm in 2012, rebooting the Star Wars franchise.1 The company appeals to a broad-based audience ranging from young children to older generations, with cross-cultural demographic appeal as well. Its vision is to be a "leading diversified international family entertainment and media enterprise," encompassing media networks, parks, resorts, studios, Broadway shows, consumer products (toys, games, books, and videos), and interactive media.2
The company employs 180,000 persons in over 40 countries around the world.3 Its 2015 financial results included revenue of US$52.46 billion, net income of US$8.38 billion, operating income of US$14.68 billion, and total assets of US$88.18 billion. The company is global in every sense of the word, with parks in Europe, Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and the Americas, and an audience reach just as wide. Its headquarters are located in Burbank, California.
Stakeholder Mapping
As Freeman notes, there are multiple stakeholders in a single firm.4 In the Walt Disney Company, those stakeholders include the following groups:
Owners: Disney is a publicly traded company, so shareholders own the company. Institutional holdings account for nearly 60% of shares, divided among nearly 2,000 holders. The top five institutional owners are Vanguard, State Street Corp, FMR, State Farm, and BlackRock. Laurene Jobs (wife of the late Steve Jobs) is the largest individual shareholder.5
Management: Disney's management is extended across over 40 countries worldwide. Community: Community stakeholders are equally global, including residents near theme parks in Florida, California, Japan, Europe, and the Middle East, as well as those near cruise ship routes and theatrical productions. Employees: With 180,000 persons employed worldwide, Disney's workforce is culturally diverse. Suppliers: These range from toy manufacturers to production designers, cruise ship contractors, broadcasters, costume makers, and more. Customers: Consumers of Disney's services, products, and entertainment span a demographic age range of roughly 5 to 65.
According to Freeman's stakeholder theory, there are two main definitions of stakeholders — the narrow definition and the wide definition.6 Within the narrow definition are stakeholders who play a vital role in the successful operation of the company; within the wide definition are stakeholders who can in some way impact or be impacted by the company.
Assessing stakeholders under the narrow definition: Owners fund the company's operations through the purchase of shares on the stock market; without owners, the company's stock would be deemed valueless and operations could not continue. Management oversees operations and addresses issues affecting workers, consumers, and other stakeholders — directing the company toward successful earnings or, alternatively, toward levels of debt that could lead to bankruptcy. Employees are vital to executing the mission at the local scale, in each individual market or enterprise; the company in turn provides incentives such as 401(k) plans, insurance, and wages. Suppliers contribute to the company's ability to grow, develop, and produce its products and services, and in turn receive cash flow for their own firms. Customers consume the goods and services and receive a level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction — the former generating brand praise, the latter generating complaints, returns, or lawsuits. Government administrations play a vital role as regulators overseeing all aspects of business; in turn, the company lobbies legislators in support of pro-business legislation. Regionally, countries maintain specific broadcasting laws, content rights, and legal and regulatory guidelines for theme parks that must be negotiated and followed. As Browne and Nuttall note, "The success of a business depends on its relationships with the external world — regulators, potential customers and staff, activists, and legislators."7
The wide definition encompasses additional stakeholder groups. The Community and the firm are intertwined in a relationship in which both must benefit for the company to succeed; Disney employs persons from local communities and contributes to local economies. The Environment is both impacted by and impactful on the company — lush natural settings support theme parks such as Disney's Florida resort, its cruise lines depend on the sea, and its manufacturing operations are subject to carbon-control legislation. If the environment is damaged, the company's own assets and operations are at risk.
Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy
As Porter and Kramer acknowledge, "Companies must take the lead in bringing business and society back together."8 The Walt Disney Company is committed to doing precisely this through its corporate social responsibility plan, mapped out in its Citizenship Performance Summary (2014). The company notes that "to continue inspiring a passion for conservation and the environment, we connected more than 13 million kids and families with nature experiences, meeting our 2015 target ahead of schedule. We've also begun working towards the ambitious new long-term goals we set to reduce our emissions, waste, and water use."9 Disney is therefore committed to working with global communities — both young and old — to implement strategies that benefit the environment and raise conservation awareness. These efforts also generate brand affection and loyalty among consumers.
Zadek notes that companies seeking to act offensively rather than defensively — both to the market and to consumer needs — through a CSR platform must "be able to predict and credibly respond to society's changing awareness of particular issues."10 For Disney, there are few significant gaps between the declarative level and the actual practice of its corporate responsibility. The Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship and the Reputation Institute recently named The Walt Disney Company a "leader in Corporate Social Responsibility" for its charitable donations, particularly to victims of natural disasters such as the 2010 earthquake in Haiti.11 The company also encourages volunteerism by exchanging community service for free park tickets, boosting active engagement within communities and care for the environment.12 Disney is thus noted by centers of learning, such as Boston College, for making good on its stated commitments.
As the company continuously reconceives its products and markets, redefines productivity in the value chain, and enables local cluster development — in accordance with Porter and Kramer's three ways of creating shared value and Zadek's CSR managerial framework13 — it also manages to boost stakeholder value through its CSR approach. In its marketing and filmmaking, for instance, Disney showcases female heroines and other minorities, as seen in the Star Wars and Marvel films. Its television programming on ABC, including the drama series Pretty Little Liars, supports LGBT issues. Its theme parks, such as the one in Florida, promote environmental stewardship by teaching visitors about human impacts on the planet and how to conserve natural resources.
Conclusion
In this manner, the Walt Disney Company will demonstrate that it is dedicated to responding responsibly and with stakeholder concern by placing safety above all else at its theme parks. By protecting its guests and eradicating dangerous threats, the company will strengthen stakeholder trust and continue to build its CSR reputation as a firm that cares not only about the environment, but also about the people it invites to interact with that environment every day. The company can move past the recent reputational damage associated with the child's death at the park and chart a new course — treating this episode as an opportunity for meaningful organizational growth.
Bibliography
Brown, J., and Nuttall, R. Beyond Corporate Social Responsibility: Integrated External Engagement. 2013.
Business Review. "The Walt Disney Company — A Leader in Corporate Social Responsibility." 2013. Web. Accessed 5 Jun 2016 from
Freeman, E. R. "A Stakeholder Theory of Modern Corporation." In L. P. Hartmann (ed.), Perspectives in Business Ethics, 3rd edition, pp. 112–122. New York, 2005.
Gioia, Dennis. "Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities." Journal of Business Ethics 11, no. 5–6 (1992).
Josephson Institute. Making Ethical Decisions: The Six Pillars of Character.
Porter, M. E., and Kramer, M. R. "The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value." Harvard Business Review 89, no. 1 (2011): 4.
Walt Disney Company. About — History. Web. Accessed 5 Jun 2016 from https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/about/.
Walt Disney Company. Our Businesses. Web. Accessed 5 Jun 2016 from https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/about/#our-businesses.
Walt Disney Company. Global Footprint. Web. Accessed 5 Jun 2016 from http://disneycareers.com/en/about-disney/global-footprint/.
Walt Disney Company. Citizenship Performance Summary, 2014. Web. Accessed 5 Jun 2016 from
"You'll Never Guess the One Woman Who Owns More of Disney Than Anyone Else." Motley Fool. Web. Accessed 5 Jun 2016 from
Zadek, S. "The Path to Corporate Social Responsibility." Harvard Business Review 82, no. 12 (2004): 126.
Zadek, S. The Civil-Learning Tool. 2004.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.