Death Penalty Cannot Be Equalled Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

[James fieser] We also have to assess the 'proportionality of happiness' factor in determining if capital punishment is justifiable in a particular case. That is to say that if the execution of a prisoner will save the lives of many people capital punishment can be approved in such cases. Let us for instance take the example of a captured terrorist or a suicide bomber. In this case it is fairly obvious that the destructive potential of these people would be greater and consequently their execution entails greater safety, protection and happiness for the society. Under these circumstances capital punishment stands clearly justified. Finally, the cost factor is also used by abolitionists in supporting their argument. While the legal cost of executions maybe high they are insignificant when compared with delivering justice.

The deontological theory on the other hand is concerned only with the rightfulness of an act irrespective of its consequences. So the deterrent value of the capital punishment is not taken into account. Kant, the chief proponent of the deontology theory advocated punishment as a 'categorical imperative' and the 'principle of equality' [Allen Stairs]. In his article, Koch the former Mayor of New York, and a proponent of capital punishment also quotes "natural law properly authorizes the sovereign to take life in order the vindicate justice. (Edward I. Koch) in other words, all the people who are found to be guilty must be punished. (Retributive justice). Anything that threatens the social order or the moral structure of the society must be dealt with severely. Behavioural codes are in place in a society and the freedom of the individual is circumscribed within these boundaries. Violation of the basic rights of others is a serious crime and perpetrators of crimes like murders deserve appropriate punishment. When the living rights of innocent people are at stake retributive justice is a matter of dutiful obligation on the part of the judicial system. (Edward I. Koch)

Capital Punishment stands justified even on moral grounds. If killing is unjustified, then even killing for self-defence cannot be justified as well. Since the murderer has so blatantly violated social norms and took away the life of an innocent person he has thrown away his right to mercy and must therefore face justice. The possibility of an innocent person being wrongly judged and executed remains the only serious issue against capital punishment. The fact that since 1977 more than 120 innocent victims released after being awarded capital punishment gives reason for concern. [DPIC]. However, it is certain that the advancements in forensic science would eliminate such problems in the future. (for example, DNA tests)


Punishments are imposed to reduce the probability of crimes happening and for restoring social order. The assessment as to whether Death penalty is essential or if it can be substituted with non-lethal alternatives is complicated. Ethical, moral and spiritual considerations are to be evaluated in deciding upon whether or not capital punishment is necessary. Sympathetic considerations must not allow an escape hatch for convicted heinous criminals who have seriously undermined social order and harmony by breaking the law. Sometimes the perpetrator is in flagrant violation of ethical and moral laws (like terrorists and serial killers) and hence under these circumstances the moral dilemma, even if it arises, is only superficial. Capital punishment, thus, cannot be totally dismissed as unjust, and in the interest of greater well-being of the society it is permissible to award death penalty in such situations.


1) James Fieser, "Capital Punishment," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, available at

2) Dudley Sharp, "Death Penalty as a Deterrent," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, available at

3) Kenneth Cauthen, " Capital Punishment," Accessed on 3rd June 2007,

Available at,

4) Death Penalty Information Center, "Facts About Death Penalty," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, available at

5) Bureau of Justice Statistics, "Capital Punishment Statistics," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, Available at,

6) Allen Stairs, "Kant on Retributive Justice," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, Available at,

7) Koch, Edward. "Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life." The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Writing. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon, 2000

8) Wesley Lowe, 'Pro Death Penalty', Accessed on 3rd June 2007, available at

9) Edward I. Koch, 'The death penalty: can it ever be justified', New

York Republic, April 15, 1985[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Death Penalty Cannot Be Equalled" (2007, June 04) Retrieved December 10, 2016, from

"Death Penalty Cannot Be Equalled" 04 June 2007. Web.10 December. 2016. <>

"Death Penalty Cannot Be Equalled", 04 June 2007, Accessed.10 December. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Death Penalty Evolution of the Death Penalty

    Death Penalty Evolution of the Death Penalty in Supreme Court Jurisprudence Capital punishment has been in existence for centuries. As early back as the Eighteenth Century B.C., the use of the death penalty was found in the Code of King Hammurabi (Death Penalty Information Center [DPIC], 2010). The utilization of the death penalty for designated crimes continued through the years and became incorporated in Britain's penal system (DPIC, 2010). Britain's use of

  • Death Penalty & Race in

    " This article puts forward the notion that when analyzing the "...relationships between minority groups and mainstream populations," the issue of whether the use of "formal control is applied fairly and consistently between these different groups" is a pivotal place to begin (Ruddell, et al., 2004). It is pivotal because "injustice" not only can have "a corrosive effect" on the perception of the fairness (or unfairness) of the criminal justice system;

  • Death Penalty and the Bible

    Death Penalty II The Death Penalty and the Bible The Bible is an important and valuable book providing a wealth of information, and it should be used as a determination as to whether the death penalty should be chosen for certain, specific crimes, despite the often-cited issue of separation between church and state. Biblical Crimes Rape Sodomy Bestiality Adultery Murder f. Other Crimes The Death Penalty Biblical Times Ransom From the Death Penalty The Separation of Church and State The death penalty has been

  • Death Penalty One Is Most Deterred by

    Death Penalty One is most deterred by what one fears most. From which it follows that whatever statistics fail, or do not fail, to show, the death penalty is likely to be more deterrent than any other. FACTS: If it is difficult, perhaps impossible, to prove statistically, and just as hard to disprove, that the death penalty deters more from capital crimes than available alternative punishments do (such as life imprisonment), why

  • Death Penalty as Long as

    Regardless of social status, defendants who are poorly represented by their attorneys are more likely to receive death sentences than those who are zealously represented by counsel. (in Opposition to the Death Penalty: Arbitrariness and Discrimination, 2004). While death penalty opponents cite the fact that an Alabama woman whose attorney was so drunk during her trial that the trial judge held him in contempt had her death sentence upheld

  • Death Penalty the Debate Surrounding Capital Punishment

    Death Penalty The debate surrounding capital punishment is not as clear as one might think -- in fact, there is a great deal of gray within this debate. The actual definition is State controlled taking of a human life in response to some crime committed by a person who was legally convicted of that crime (Lacayo, 2009). Capital punishment has been part of human history, and currently 58 global nations actively

  • Death Penalty Within the Realm

    The debate over the death penalty remains and the Supreme Court will most likely be asked decide such cases for years to come. Summary and Conclusion The purpose of this discussion was to examine several landmark Supreme Court cases and explain the evolution of capital punishment jurisprudence from 1972 to the present. The research focused on the cases of Furman v Georgia, Woodson v. North Carolina, Gregg v Georgia, McCleskey v

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved