Perceived Media Credibility
The media contributes immensely to the ideological beliefs held by an individual or group of people. The criminal justice system has, in recent years, embraced increasingly punitive crime-control policies with the intent of scaring off potential offenders (Gould, 2007). Such punitive measures have seen the rates of crime decline immensely, and have therefore, managed to garner massive public support.
Although the mass media, as Gould (2007) points out, has played a significant role in the increased popularity of punitive crime-control measures, it has been accused of doing so by raising false security alarms with the aim of attracting more crime news consumers. The article under analysis attempts to establish a link between media influence, and the fear of crime. The authors measured the punitive attitudes of a sampled 373 college students, through an 11-item scale covering issues such as the use of the death penalty on juveniles, parole, the purposes of sentencing, etc. Media influence was measured in terms of the frequency which a media source is used, the source's credibility, and as a measure of the main source of crime news. The fear of crime, on the other hand,...
A higher frequency of exposure to media elements, such as crime-related television shows, in itself, leads an individual to develop a punitive criminal system attitude. The author's main point, therefore, is that there exists a direct link between the media variables, and the development of punitive orientations (Waid-Lindberg, Dobbs, Shelley, 2011).
The regression analysis representation in table 7 shows some degree of significance between the number of hours spent watching local television news, and the development of punitive attitudes (Waid-Lindberg, Dobbs, Shelley, 2011). This implies that an increase in the number of hours would automatically translate to increased 'punitiveness' (Waid-Lindberg et al., 2011). This significance, moreover, would remain even after the credibility variables are incorporated into the model (Waid-Lindberg et al., 2011). The authors in this case hold that, apart from the frequency of watching crime-related shows, no other frequency variable is significant to the development of punitive attitudes (Waid-Lindberg et al., 2011).
In reinforcing their argument, the authors put forward two explanations to this phenomenon; first, that television, unlike newspapers and the internet, does not give consumers the freedom to choose what crime news to, or not to watch; and secondly, that news consumers would usually settle for a…
References
Beckett, K. (1999). Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gould, J. (2007). The Innocence Commission: Preventing Wrongful Convictions and Restoring the Criminal Justice System. New York: New York University Press.
Waid-Lindberg, C.A., Dobbs, R.R. & Shelley, T. (2011). Blame the Media? The Influence of Primary News Source, Frequency of Usage, and Perceived Media Credibility on Punitive Attitudes. Western Criminology Review, 12(3), 41-59.
In 1999, the average person in England and Wales watched 26 hours of television and listened to 19 hours of radio per week - this amounts to 40% of their waking life, and the figures are higher for youth and in particular working class youth (Young). Not only has the quantity of media usage increased, but the level of violence depicted in the media has increased dramatically, due in part
New Media Implications The improvement of internet and other technology and its ready availability to more and more people has revolutionized the structure and population of the media around the world. People that would normally be members of the audience have become the creators of news and vice versa. The lines that separate news makers and people that normally would be making news or expected to make news have blurred significantly
The spin that often surrounds war, is fundamentally damaging even if it is intended as damage control for the nation as a whole, or at the very least the leaders of the nation. Public Belief It has been hinted at within this work that the old adage, the public does not necessarily believe what it hears, but it hears what it believes is at play when it comes to media. As
Media and Conflict The existence of a pro-business, pro-government bias led to ineffectual journalistic coverage of U.S. unemployment during the period leading up to the 2008-2009 recession. In what has come to be known as the Great Recession because of its comparability to the Great Depression, the U.S. unemployment rate reached historic highs. The magnitude of the recession was such that economists and policy-makers should have been better prepared to manage
Media and Monopoly In 1983, fifty corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the United States. According to the book The Media Monopoly written by Ben Bagdikian and published in 1992, "in the U.S., fewer than two dozen of these companies own and operate ninety percent of the mass media" -- controlling almost all of America's newspapers, magazines, television and radio stations, books, records, movies, videos, wire services
" Meanwhile, "False Balancing" is where "both sides are seldom accorded equal prominence," Parenti asserts. As an example of this tendency, Parenti writes that when it comes to a conservative issue, NPR (National Public Radio), perceived as a liberal institution, interviews a "right wing spokesperson" alone. But when it's a liberal issue being discussed, NPR has a liberal and a conservative on together. Endorsement / Disparagement: Some media use "labels" like "the