Film Review

Three major problems in the US health care system are cost, access to care, and coverage (Frontline, 2008). The commodifcation of health care is a major root cause of all of the above (Pellegrino, 1999). Rather than preventing health care problems, the industry focuses on treating symptoms and performing often unnecessary testing because this is where the profit liesnot in prevention (Goldhill, 2009). The industry puts profit first instead of people. Preventive health would go a long way to reducing many of the health problems seen today, such as obesity and heart disease, but the integrated manner of industry today is such that the sugar industry would suffer if the health care industry actually focused on getting people to reduce their sugar intake so as to lead healthier lives. Because all industries are essentially controlled by a small percentage of wealthy capitalists, the integration is purposeful and deliberate. The reason the problems of cost, access to care, and coverage have not been fixed in America is simply that the profit motive reigns supreme.

Other countries around the world have different systems in place, but they do not really solve the problem of cost. In the UK, health care is socializedbut taxes are higher there than in the US because someone still has to pay for care; and wait times for getting a procedure done are long, too. In Switzerland costs are comparable to what they are in the US, but in Spain they are much lower because there health care is free (but, again, taxes are high). In Japan it is no different: there the people have better health statistics than in the US, but they also spend three times as much time in hospitals getting tests and treatments (Frontline, 2008). To some, so much time in a hospital takes a toll on ones quality of life, and that has to be measured as a cost, even if financially speaking the cost of care is lower there than in the US. Taiwan uses a smart card system in which the government pays for care, but the problem of funding is a serious one and it is unclear whether this approach is sustainable (Frontline, 2008). In Germany, there is universal health care, and costs are lower because care providers are paid much less than in the US (Frontline,...

But Germany also offers alternative forms of treatment such as homeopathy and spa treatment. What all of this means is that there is no clear indication that universal health care can fix the problems described above because it does not necessarily get to the root of the matter. The root of the problem is that there is too little emphasis on prevention and too much on treatment and testing. People are not taught to live healthy lives; they are taught to consume unhealthy products and health care providers push harmful drugs onto patients like they did in the lead-up to the opioid crisis. There is too little open dialogue about issues like COVID, where it has been shown by researchers that re-purposed drugs like Ivermectin can prevent the spread of the disease because relying on cheap solutions like that takes the profit out of the game. Health care should not be an industry like it is today. That is the major underlying issue, and it is not one that universal coverage will necessarily solve because it does not necessarily imply that preventive health care will be emphasized.

In the US, there is no real separation between business and state, so when the question is asked whether the government should provide for the health of the working people, it is essentially a question of whether the same people selling health care to the working people should be able to continue to do so at exorbitant rates and in unnecessary and often harmful ways. The wealthiest and largest firms control health care in the US: it is a large monopoly in which the biggest companies influence and set policy among regulators by contributing to the campaigns of legislators (Boushey, 2019). In the government of the US, law makers protect the interests of the top 1% and the top businesses. The government should not have to provide for the health of anyone; the market should be free and anti-trust regulations should be enforced so as to prevent monopolies. If the government is going to do anything, whether for workers or for non-workers, it should insist that health care providers emphasize preventive health: but this is not going to happen because if preventive health were practiced it would take the profits out of the industry, for people would be healthier and have less reason to seek out the services, treatments, tests and drugs that the industry has to sell to them.

The problem is not that government does too little in the US; it is that government does too much to serve the interests of the oligarchy (Boushey, 2019). This service perpetuates inequalities as it ensures that the wealthy class benefits at the expense of the lower classes. Private investment in health care could…