Immigration in the 19th Century and Today
One of the reasons people would be opposed to immigration today even though immigrants helped to grow this country in the 19th century is that today the US is no longer growing in the same way. People have been here for generations and they fear that more immigration will displace them from their neighborhoods or jobs or schools. They see America no longer as a land of opportunity for all but as something that they possess and that they are at risk of losing.
This was pretty much the case at the end of the 19th century, too. The original set of Anglo-Saxon Protestants who shaped the founding of the country after the Revolutionary War had carved out niches for themselves. They had a clear cultural and ethnic stronghold. The immigrants that came into the country after the Civil War and during the Industrial Revolution were from other parts of Europe and all over the world, too. They did not share the same culture as the White Anglo-Saxon Protestants in a lot of cases. This is because the late 19th century saw a shift in the origins of immigrants from predominantly Northern and Western Europe to Southern and Eastern Europe, including Italians, Poles, and Jews. These new immigrants were often seen as racially and culturally inferior by the existing population, who were primarily of Anglo-Saxon descent. Nativist sentiments were fueled by groups like the Know-Nothings and later the Immigration Restriction League, which promoted the idea that these new immigrants would not and could not assimilate into American culture and would erode American values and ideals and ways of life (Alsan et al.).
Religious differences were also a source of tension at the time. Many of the new immigrants were Catholics or Jews, in contrast to the predominantly Protestant native-born Americans. This led to fears of religious conflicts and the dilution of Protestant cultural dominance. It should be remembered that America was once the land of Catholic Spain and that eventually it fell to the Protestant British.
Works Cited
Alsan, Marcella, Katherine Eriksson, and Gregory Niemesh.Understanding the success of the know-nothing party. No. w28078. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020.
America's Medical System is Broken: Can it Be Saved and at What Cost? It is not an undisclosed reality that the health care system of the United States of America is the most expensive in the world. The American government spends almost two times as much per individual as compared to other advanced nation-states for achieving better health outcomes. However, they are neither better nor satisfactory and are much poorer in
..) the subsequent U.S. occupation of the island tied its economy ever closed to the United States as U.S. military governors promulgated laws giving U.S. firms concessionary access to the Cuban market. By the late 1920s U.S. firms controlled 75% of the sugar industry and most of the mines, railroads, and public utilities." (Leogrande and Thomas, 2002, 325-6) The economic dependence on the United States and in particular the high degree
America's Cuban Conundrum The Helms-Burton Act and the Cuban-American Trade Relations The United States and Cuba have had increased amounts of hostility toward each other present in their relations ever since the Cuban revolution. Not only did Cuba nationalize property held by U.S. interests during the revolution, but also Cuba became an ally to Russia during the Cold War; which was critical to the Soviet strategy since Cuba is in close proximity
America and Diversity Impacts of Immigration on U.S. America has indeed a true diverse population and challenges of having such a diversified group of people range from the most serious issues such as terrorism to minor issues of hygiene. In a nutshell the most important challenge is inculcating the American way of life in people from different races, believing in a same cause of freedom and future that is flourishing for both
America's Cuban Conundrum Issue that prompted the EU to take the Helm-Burton dispute to the WTO The stances of the U.S. government in the suctions issued upon Cuba were heavy and non-beneficial to many countries and subsidiary organizations. The benefits of the sanctions were felt with no role in bringing consistency of access to the exciting opportunities for business activities in Cuba. Many organizations, countries, and independent business people were willing to
Argument against colonization While the American government pursued this expansionist policy, many citizens expressed concerns and dissent, for many disparate reasons. Ironically, while expansionism was based on ideas of racial superiority, so did the counter-arguments. For example, labor leader Samuel Gompers argued against the acquisition of colonies, for fear of being swarmed by "the Negritos, the Chinese, the Malays" and the other "semi-savage races" from coming to the United States? Similar
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now