Death Penalty Cannot Be Equalled Term Paper

Length: 5 pages Sources: 5 Subject: Criminal Justice Type: Term Paper Paper: #33996901 Related Topics: Death Penalty, Life After Death, Serial Killers, Deontology
Excerpt from Term Paper :

[James fieser] We also have to assess the 'proportionality of happiness' factor in determining if capital punishment is justifiable in a particular case. That is to say that if the execution of a prisoner will save the lives of many people capital punishment can be approved in such cases. Let us for instance take the example of a captured terrorist or a suicide bomber. In this case it is fairly obvious that the destructive potential of these people would be greater and consequently their execution entails greater safety, protection and happiness for the society. Under these circumstances capital punishment stands clearly justified. Finally, the cost factor is also used by abolitionists in supporting their argument. While the legal cost of executions maybe high they are insignificant when compared with delivering justice.

The deontological theory on the other hand is concerned only with the rightfulness of an act irrespective of its consequences. So the deterrent value of the capital punishment is not taken into account. Kant, the chief proponent of the deontology theory advocated punishment as a 'categorical imperative' and the 'principle of equality' [Allen Stairs]. In his article, Koch the former Mayor of New York, and a proponent of capital punishment also quotes "natural law properly authorizes the sovereign to take life in order the vindicate justice. (Edward I. Koch) in other words, all the people who are found to be guilty must be punished. (Retributive justice). Anything that threatens the social order or the moral structure of the society must be dealt with severely. Behavioural codes are in place in a society and the freedom of the individual is circumscribed within these boundaries. Violation of the basic rights of others is a serious


When the living rights of innocent people are at stake retributive justice is a matter of dutiful obligation on the part of the judicial system. (Edward I. Koch)

Capital Punishment stands justified even on moral grounds. If killing is unjustified, then even killing for self-defence cannot be justified as well. Since the murderer has so blatantly violated social norms and took away the life of an innocent person he has thrown away his right to mercy and must therefore face justice. The possibility of an innocent person being wrongly judged and executed remains the only serious issue against capital punishment. The fact that since 1977 more than 120 innocent victims released after being awarded capital punishment gives reason for concern. [DPIC]. However, it is certain that the advancements in forensic science would eliminate such problems in the future. (for example, DNA tests)


Punishments are imposed to reduce the probability of crimes happening and for restoring social order. The assessment as to whether Death penalty is essential or if it can be substituted with non-lethal alternatives is complicated. Ethical, moral and spiritual considerations are to be evaluated in deciding upon whether or not capital punishment is necessary. Sympathetic considerations must not allow an escape hatch for convicted heinous criminals who have seriously undermined social order and harmony by breaking the law. Sometimes the perpetrator is in flagrant violation of ethical and moral laws (like terrorists and serial killers) and hence under these circumstances the moral dilemma, even if it arises, is only superficial. Capital punishment, thus, cannot be totally dismissed as unjust, and in the interest of greater well-being of the society it is permissible to award death penalty in such situations.


1) James Fieser, "Capital Punishment," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, available at

2) Dudley Sharp, "Death Penalty as a Deterrent," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, available at

3) Kenneth Cauthen, " Capital Punishment," Accessed on 3rd June 2007,

Available at,

4) Death Penalty Information Center, "Facts About Death Penalty," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, available at

5) Bureau of Justice Statistics, "Capital Punishment Statistics," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, Available at,

6) Allen Stairs, "Kant on Retributive Justice," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, Available at,

7) Koch, Edward. "Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life." The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Writing. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon, 2000

8) Wesley Lowe, 'Pro Death Penalty', Accessed on 3rd June 2007, available at

9) Edward I. Koch, 'The death penalty: can it ever be justified', New

York Republic, April 15, 1985

Sources Used in Documents:


1) James Fieser, "Capital Punishment," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, available at

2) Dudley Sharp, "Death Penalty as a Deterrent," Accessed on 3rd June 2007, available at

3) Kenneth Cauthen, " Capital Punishment," Accessed on 3rd June 2007,

Available at,

Cite this Document:

"Death Penalty Cannot Be Equalled" (2007, June 04) Retrieved October 27, 2021, from

"Death Penalty Cannot Be Equalled" 04 June 2007. Web.27 October. 2021. <>

"Death Penalty Cannot Be Equalled", 04 June 2007, Accessed.27 October. 2021,

Related Documents
Death Penalty Within the Realm
Words: 2418 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 23287435

The debate over the death penalty remains and the Supreme Court will most likely be asked decide such cases for years to come. Summary and Conclusion The purpose of this discussion was to examine several landmark Supreme Court cases and explain the evolution of capital punishment jurisprudence from 1972 to the present. The research focused on the cases of Furman v Georgia, Woodson v. North Carolina, Gregg v Georgia, McCleskey v

Capital Punishment or the Death
Words: 1830 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 87767212

The death penalty may exact a high cost but so does remaining behind bars for life imprisonment (Haag 1986). But righting wrongs in a society has a higher option than entailing the costs. Penalties are also acts of social retribution to restrain personal or private vengeance aimed at vindicating the law and social order, which has been injured or violated by a crime. Proponents or advocates of the death penalty

Death Penalty
Words: 2882 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 74137028

As such, it is unlikely to change in light of knowledge or information about the death penalty and its administration" (Vollum & Buffington-Vollum, p. 30). Furthermore, "those who scored higher on value-expressive attitudes were less accepting of information critical of the death penalty and, in turn, less likely to change their views in light of the information presented." Thus, the widespread support of the death penalty in the face

Death Penalty Ethics and Effectiveness
Words: 2641 Length: 10 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 13477407

However, sociologists argue that the retributive justice theory suffers due to the lack of appreciation of circumstantial causes involved in the commission of crime. By counting 'free will' as the only factor involved in a crime the deontological thinking lacks in the comprehensive analysis of criminal behavior. For instance the disproportionate number of crimes by the economically disadvantaged African-Americans when compared to Caucasians is a clear instance for external

Death Penalty Anti Historically, Much
Words: 5884 Length: 20 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 76641365

A good example is the 1985 murder of convenience store clerk Cynthia Barlieb, whose murder was prosecuted by a district attorney bent on securing execution for Barlieb's killer (Pompeilo 2005). The original trial and all the subsequent appeals forced Barlieb's family, including four young daughters, to spend 17 years in the legal process - her oldest daughter was 8 years old when Cynthia was first shot, and 25 when

Death Penalty & Race in
Words: 5755 Length: 15 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 25366103

" This article puts forward the notion that when analyzing the "...relationships between minority groups and mainstream populations," the issue of whether the use of "formal control is applied fairly and consistently between these different groups" is a pivotal place to begin (Ruddell, et al., 2004). It is pivotal because "injustice" not only can have "a corrosive effect" on the perception of the fairness (or unfairness) of the criminal justice system;