Exxon and Environmental Policy
Despite its assurance of the complete safety of its operations, the Exxon Valdez tanker hit a reef in Alaska's Prince William Sound at midnight of March 24, 1989 and poured 11 million gallons of Alaska North Slope crude oil from a ruptured hull of the ship (Explore North 1999). Within the next two months following the wreck, oil had spread to 470 miles to the southwest. The initial cleanup in the succeeding three years cost more than $2 billion, although no lives were lost. Wildlife destruction was staggering and the full impact of the disaster may never be known. The State of Alaska and the federal government filed both criminal and civil suits against Exxon in October 1991
In settling the civil charges, Exxon agreed to pay the State of Alaska and the United States $900 million within a 10-year period and the money would be devoted to restoration work to be administered by six government Trustees, three federal and three state (Explore North 1999). In settling the criminal charges, Exxon would be fined $250 million: $50 million restitution funds each to fall under state control and the other under federal authority. It, however, shocked many Alaskans when $125 million of the fine balance was forgiven on account of Exxon's cooperation in the cleanup and upgrading of safety procedures as preventive measure. The remaining $50 million was assigned by the courts to the Victims of Crime Act and the North American Wetlands Conservation Fund at $13 million and $12 million, respectively (Explore North). On September 16, 1994, a jury in the federal court returned a $ billion punitive damages suit against Exxon, which appealed several times (Explore North). The delay went in favor of Exxon, which earns $90,000 per hour or almost $2 million a day or close to $800 a year. With the delay at the...
" (United States Department of Agriculture - Forest Services, 2000) The draft environmental impact statement elicited over 1.1 million responses which the Forest Service identified and summarized into six major issue categories including: 1) Public access; 2) Identification of other unroaded areas; 3) Exemptions and exceptions 4) Environmental effects; 5) Local involvement; and 6) the effect on communities with strong natural resource affiliations. (United States Department of Agriculture - Forest Services, 2000) These issues served to guide
National Environmental Policy Act was passed in 1970. Explain the formal process for an Environmental Impact Statement and detail the impact NEPA has had on the field of environmental science. The National Environmental Policy Act imposes environmentally safe practices among different agencies inside the federal government. To enforce these provisions the law requires that environmental assessments and impact statements are conducted. These are measuring the total environmental effects from the activities
NEPA and SEQRA The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was ratified in 1970. It is a federal law that is designed to assess the damage to the environment from various projects. This was in response to decades of neglect to the ecosystem and its effect on the general public. Under the law, any project that is initiated by the federal government must conduct some type of
Also, commercially sold products at Wal-Mart, even if part of major labels, should not mislead consumers as to their origin or product composition. Finally, Wal-Mart will strive to reduce its consumption of fossil fuels in the environment, and make alternative products, such as organic produce, available for consumers to choose over standard products. Wal-Mart is committed to choice. How the policy is to be implemented Wal-Mart will refuse to allow products
..as long as those programs were at least as effective as the federal program." (the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act) The passing of this Act by congress is therefore aimed at ensuring adequate health and safety standards for all workers. In terms of employers, the Act was designed to make sure that the place of employment was free of any hazards that might be injurious or detrimental to safety and
The 1980s (the period when Ronald Reagan was the U.S. President) witnessed a series of government measures targeting environmental regulations. This resulted in public outrage against the anti-environmental policies of the government leading to a renewed interest in nature clubs and groups and the formation of radical groups who led strong movements to protect the environment. (vii) the post- Reagan resurgence (1990s onwards) - President Bush and President Clinton
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now