How And Why To Repeal The War On Drugs

PAGES
2
WORDS
647
Cite

War on drugs is one of the biggest human rights and social justice atrocities currently in the United States. There are actually no winners in the war on drugs, not unless leaders of drug smuggling operations can be considered "winners." Law enforcement loses because their precious resources are being diverted from serious crimes to drug crimes. Ordinary citizens lose because police officers are overly concerned with non-violent drug possession and even distribution cases than they are with actual societal harm. Drug use causes no more harm than alcohol use, and it makes no sense to retain drug prohibition when harm reduction seems to call for more open approaches to drug regulation. As Benavie (2009) points out, the damage caused by the war on drugs includes an uptake in violence because of the operations of organized crime, contaminated drugs like the recent fentanyl crisis leading to preventable deaths, property crimes due to the desperation needed to maintain an addiction to black market substances, loss of freedom and civil liberties, and widespread corruption. The desire to alter consciousness is a natural human instinct, which is why Prohibition failed -- and which is why the prohibition of drugs has also failed.

Gradually there are changes...

...

But these changes are insignificant compared to the sweeping reform that is actually needed to eliminate the war on drugs. Benavie (2009) outlines all the reasons why the war on drugs does more harm than good, preventing people from having access to safe drugs that have been tested by laboratories instead of relying on potentially tainted black market substances. Everyone loses in the war on drugs because drug use is not restricted to certain classes, genders, or ethnicities. Drug use patterns might differ in terms of what demographic prefers what drug, but even those patterns change over time.
Reactions to drug use are out of proportion to the harms that the drugs actually cause. The country did not learn its lesson from prohibition, during which initial alarmist sentiments influenced federal policy. When that policy proved to be a failure due to the proliferation of organized crime and driving alcohol production and sales underground, prohibition was repealed. Prohibition only lasted a few years; drug prohibition has lasted several generations with quantifiable deleterious effects. Benavie (2009) argues that the war on drugs is driven not by logic, reason, or scientific evidence…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Benavie, A. (2009). Drugs: America's holy war. In Charon, J. M., & Vigilant, L. G. (2012). Social problems: readings with four questions. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.


Cite this Document:

"How And Why To Repeal The War On Drugs" (2017, April 19) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/how-and-why-to-repeal-the-war-on-drugs-2164766

"How And Why To Repeal The War On Drugs" 19 April 2017. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/how-and-why-to-repeal-the-war-on-drugs-2164766>

"How And Why To Repeal The War On Drugs", 19 April 2017, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/how-and-why-to-repeal-the-war-on-drugs-2164766

Related Documents

14). Soon, Congress passed the Marijuana Tax Act, which was signed into law in 1937. Like the Harrison Act, the Marijuana Tax Act placed marijuana into the same category as the cocaine and opium drugs. It was now illegal to import marijuana into the United States (McWilliams, 1991). However, this law was ineffective in curbing marijuana use (Brecher, 1986, p. 14). By the early 1940s narcotic addiction had significantly reduced

American Drug Policy
PAGES 10 WORDS 3213

Drug Policy American Drug Policy: Marijuana Marijuana is one of the most vilified drugs in history and it very difficult to see just why this is so. The United States used to have a thriving agricultural concern that consisted of hemp (marijuana) famers producing plants for their fibers and seeds. The fibers were used in products such as rope and paper and the seeds were used to make oil which served as

Drugs and Alcohol Issues Explain your opinion on the legalization of illicit drugs. Do you believe that legalizing drugs will "increase" or "decrease" drug abuse? I think that some illicit recreational drugs should be legalized simply because they cannot be distinguished from licit recreational drugs such as alcohol and tobacco. Both tobacco and marijuana (for example) are leafy crops that can be harvested and smoked to provide various physiological sensations that users

Drug Legalization LEGALIZATION OF RECREATIONAL DRUG USE In 1920 the sale and consumption of alcohol was criminalized across the United States pursuant to the 18th Amendment. Consumer demand nevertheless presented a ripe opportunity for criminal usurpation of the illicit production and distribution of alcohol. Consequently, by the time Prohibition was subsequently repealed by the 21st Amendment in 1933, the criminal enterprises that it had spawned were so firmly entrenched into the landscape of the

Drug Laws The Shortcomings in our Current Drug Law Policy: Research Proposal As a major policy issue in the United States, the War on Drugs has been one of the most monumental failures on modern record. At a cost of billions of taxpayer dollars, thousands of lives lost and many thousands of others ruined by untreated addiction or incarceration, America's policy orientation concerning drug laws is due for reconsideration. Indeed, the very

Drug Policies of the United States and the Netherlands Virtually every country in the world has drug prohibition and criminalizes the production and sale of cannabis, cocaine, and opiates, except for medical uses, and most countries criminalize the production and sale of other psychoactive substances, and moreover, most countries criminalize simple possession of small amounts of the prohibited substances (Levine 2002). However, no Western country and few Third World countries have