Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Consulting
Introduction
Lee Bolman and Terrance Deal's (2017) "Reframing Organizations" and Peter Block's (2011) "Flawless Consulting" are both books that focus on the practice of consulting in organizations. Both authors present frameworks and strategies for working with teams in organizational settings. However, they do so in both similar and different ways.
Similarities and Differences
One similarity between the two books is that both authors stress the importance of effective communication and relationship-building when working with teams. Bolman and Deal discuss the importance of understanding different perspectives and building trust with clients, while Block emphasizes the importance of active listening and building rapport.
Another similarity is that both authors discuss the importance of being aware of one's own biases and assumptions when working with teams. Bolman and Deal discuss the importance of "reframing" one's perspective in order to better understand and work with different stakeholders, while Block emphasizes the importance of being aware of one's own assumptions and "blind spots" when working with clients.
One major difference between the two books is that Bolman and Deal's "Reframing Organizations" is more focused on the overall structure and functioning of organizations, while Block's "Flawless Consulting" is more focused on the specific practice of consulting, on dealing with people and their emotions. Bolman and Deal provide frameworks for understanding and working with different types of organizations, while Block provides strategies for working with clients and facilitating effective change. For example, Bolman and Deal cite Dane and Pratt (2007) to emphasize the role that frameworks play, and they also refer to Simon and Chase (1973) to show the link between thinking like a chess master and reframing and organization with the right framework. Block (2011) on the other hand pays attention to the emotional and personal dimensions of our workplaces (p. xviii). Block (2011) for instance shows show humor can be useful in consulting because it brings people back to earth and reduces stress, which is something other researchers have shown as well...…help the client see a problem in a different light, which can lead to new insights and solutions that were not previously considered. Reframing can also help to shift negative or limiting beliefs and attitudes that may be preventing the client from making progress. And feedback is the process of providing information to clients and teams about their performance or behavior in order to help them improve. It can be useful in consulting because it allows the consultant to help the client identify areas where they need to improve and take action to make positive changes. Feedback can also help to build trust and accountability, as clients and teams are more likely to take responsibility for their actions when they receive regular, honest, and respectful feedback. All three can be useful tools in consulting because they can help to create a more relaxed and open environment, shift negative or limiting beliefs and attitudes, and help clients and teams identify areas where they…
References
Block, P. (2011). Flawless Consulting: A Guide To Getting Your Expertise Used. Jossey-Bass.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, andleadership. Jossey-Bass.
Bouwmeester, O. (2013). Consultant jokes about managing uncertainty: Coping throughhumor. International Studies of Management & Organization, 43(3), 41-57.
Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision-making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 33–54Simon, H. A., & Chase, W. G. (1973). American Scientist. Scientist, 61(4), 394-403.
Trust Explain how you develop and maintain trust at work and why confidentiality is so important in building and maintaining trust at work. Trust is critical to the functioning of any team or organization. Individual employees need to be able to trust their role in the organization so that ideas, concerns, and opinions are shared freely. Likewise, supervisors need to trust their employees will share their opinions that pertain to increasing productivity.
Periods of trust in the government are not, perhaps, as easily identified, but they are just as numerous. Following the onset of the Depression and the election of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a period of restored faith and hope in the government began and continued throughout World War II and after. Prior to that, there was a great deal of trust placed in the federal government throughout much of the first
(2009), yet faculty trust was included as an identified feature of academic optimism and thus the relationship of these two studies is made clear and the reliability of Smith and Hoy's (2007) study greatly increased. This study also did not take race into account, making it again less comprehensive and slightly less meaningful than Goddard et al. (2009). Comparisons of race and of racial attitudes to academic achievement abound in
He notes there has been an overall decline in government trust since the mid-1960s. Only once since 1975 has government trust broke 50%. That occurred in the months following 9/11. After the tumultuous assassinations of the 1960s, the Vietnam War, the resignation of President Nixon, and the stagflation of the late 1970s, public trust fell from 80% in 1966 to about 25% in 1981. The Watergate scandal, the regularity
Trusted Friends Fast Food Nation: Chapter 2 review "Your trusted friends" (31-59) One of the most striking aspects of McDonald's is the way in which it markets itself as a 'friendly' organization committed to family values, even while it sells food that is blatantly unhealthy and damaging to consumers' health. The Happy Meals it promotes to children have an innocent quality, even while the food is carefully engineered so that it
The principal is the property that is contained in the trust that produces income like dividends, rents, and interest. Payments for bills to the trust may be paid out of either income or principal but payments to beneficiaries may be made out from income only. Where such payments will be made lies within the discretion of the trustee. Determining the proper distribution of income and principal is one of