Operation Anaconda Case Study

Length: 4 pages Sources: 5 Subject: Military Type: Case Study Paper: #68725294 Related Topics: Army, Case Study, Operations, Trust
Excerpt from Case Study :

Case Study: Operation Anaconda

The U.S. military initiated operation Anaconda to vacate the enemy, Al Qaeda, and Taliban, from Shahikot valley in Afghanistan in March 2002 (Kugler, 2007). The launch was planned with a complex approach that involved the hammer and anvil technique for eliminating the enemy from Afghani land. The mission was considered the U.S. army killed a success as hundreds of enemy fighters whereas only 50 U.S. army men were injured and a mere eight men were killed. Much credit was given to the deployment of joint operations and modern information networks utilized for this mission. However, this paper aims at analytically analyzing the seven principles of mission command pertinent to Operation Anaconda.

The seven principles of mission command inculcate mutual trust, shared understanding, mission orders, commanders intent, disciplined initiative, competence, and risk acceptance (Nilsson, 2020). The first principle, mutual trust, is the foundational principle for building a team that should be courageous enough to fight the enemy on the battleground. It is the degree of confidence and dependability that team members have that strengthen them internally to be better equipped with the required commitment to fight. The commitment that soldiers of Operation Anaconda from the U.S. side showed in their mission was seen as trust in their leaders and within their abilities. For instance, when the intelligence estimates were given to the U.S. officials that the enemy fighters could be 200-300 in number with light weapons instead of 1000, the officials trusted their guesses and contemplated upon their further...


6). However, later, the initial intelligence guestimates were wrong as the heavily armed enemy fighters were 700-1000 in numbers. With their resilience and trust in their skillfulness, the change in plan and actions turned the tables on the Taliban.

Another principle, shared understanding, was present in Operation Anaconda fighters since they knew the operational environment and the purpose they were teamed up. The contingency planning and the knowledge of the area, such as narrow pathways of the mountains, the exit routes if the enemy attacked them suddenly with force, and soil structure of the mountain, whether they are slippery or strong and sturdy for running, were to be deployed for the mission. The intelligence guesses were initially faulty since they plentifully relied on the friendliness of the Afghan troops who were supposed to act as the U.S. armys allies. The Taliban fighters were positioned along the ridgelines of the mountains with all the heavy machinery for fighting. The U.S. army had a shrewd sense of planning for critical contingencies that helped control the situation when in the combat zone so that innocent civilians should not be hurt.

The mission orders are to be followed by the troops to achieve the desired results. The U.S. army already set the priorities by devising the name of the mission, Anaconda, whose aim was to coil around its victim to crush it, as the Anaconda snake does (Kugler, 2007, p. 10). Similarly, when on 20th February, General Hagenback issued his formal orders for the mission, they were to be obeyed by the subordinates by allocating the resources…

Sources Used in Documents:


Kugler, R. (2007). Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan: A case study of adaptation on battle. Center for Technology and National Security Policy. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA463075.pdf

Nilsson, N. (2020). Practicing mission command for future battlefield challenges: The case of the Swedish army. Defense Studies, 20(4), 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2020.1828870

Patryk, M.D. (2017). Mission command principles in the battle of Chipyong-Ni. Safety and Defense, 3(1), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.37105/sd.23

Pruitt, B.K. (2017). Principles of mission command applied to civil-military relationships. School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command, and General Staff College. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1039897.pdf

U.S. Department of the Army. (2019). ADP 6.0 mission command: Command and control of the army forces. Army Doctrine Publication. https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/adp6_0.pdf

Cite this Document:

"Operation Anaconda" (2021, June 02) Retrieved November 30, 2021, from

"Operation Anaconda" 02 June 2021. Web.30 November. 2021. <

"Operation Anaconda", 02 June 2021, Accessed.30 November. 2021,

Related Documents
Anaconda Operation Anaconda There Were
Words: 575 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Military Paper #: 25896227

Part of the reason this chain of command was both so complex and so ambiguous -- many officers involved in the operation later expressed confusion as to exactly who reported to whom, and where commands were originating -- was that General Frank of CENTCOM had strictly limited the amount of forward deployed command staff and resources he wanted moved to the Shahikot Valley (Grossman 2004; Lambeth 2005). Even without

Operation Anaconda
Words: 1318 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Military Paper #: 26835138

Appraisal of Operation Anaconda Kugler (2007) states that Operation Anaconda was the first large-scale battle to be carried out as part of Operation Enduring Freedom, which incorporated joint efforts between Special Forces and multinational partners. These forces worked together in Shahi Kot Vallley in Afghanistan in 2002. The battle took place in a rugged mountainous terrain with extremely complex circumstances for the soldiers. In addition to the complex terrain, the soldiers

Problems in Operation Anaconda
Words: 1256 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Military Paper #: 58723365

Joint Planning During Operation Anaconda Operation Anaconda was the first large-scale Army combat operation that was carried out as part of Operation Enduring Freedom. This operation included joint efforts by Special Operations and multinational partners who worked together in the Shahi Kot Valley in Afghanistan in March 2002 (Isherwood, 2007). Operation Anaconda was a relatively complex operation since it was fought in rugged mountainous terrain that was characterized by extremely difficult

Joint Function As Related to Operation Anaconda
Words: 1407 Length: 5 Pages Topic: War Paper #: 19705525

Summary Joint functions or warfighting functions are the tasks that systems that are used by commanders to accomplish missions and objectives. Systems refer to people, organizations, processes, and information. There are six warfighting functions namely mission command, movement and maneuver, intelligence, fires, sustainment, and protection. These functions are mostly used to reinforce and complement each other. While each function has its own role to play it cannot be used in isolation

Union Achieve Victory in These Years The
Words: 1086 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Military Paper #: 82132461

Union achieve victory in these years? The way that Union was able to achieve victory between 1863 and 1865 was: through a war of attrition, dividing the Confederacy along with taking the fight to the heart of the South. A war of attrition would take place, once Grant was given command of all Union forces. Where, he would continue to pursue Lee in game of cat and mouse. What happened