In the first point, the author's style is clear, concise, friendly, and reasoned. He presents himself as a professional with an understanding of the topic, but also as a teacher who wishes to impart his knowledge to others. An examination of his definitions is sufficient to understand the simplicity with which he writes. For instance, he describes globalization as "a set of processes that bring about a palpable sense of worldwide interconnectedness" (Prabu 14). This definition allows readers of all levels to understand the concept of globalization. Others who have a more advanced understanding of this topic may argue that this definition is too simple, but here it shows an advanced understanding of his audience and a desire to make his argument without the frustration of complexities. In addition, Prabu continues by using simple language to identify what he sees as a problem in international relations -- the conflicting nature of globalization and nationalism -- as well as his argument for change.
In addition to clear language, the author uses familiar and adequate arguments to support his thesis. Instead of supporting his thesis with arguments with international relations theories...
He sites well-known public figures such as Ghandi, and grants generous quotes to Hanks Kung, explaining a concept that even first grade students understand -- talking instead of fighting. Finally, Prabu uses the United States as a canvas to suggest that the model he presents can work successfully. These arguments are not only familiar, or easy for the readers to understand, but adequate, in that they suggest his thesis is not only the stuff of
common sense, but also working today in the United States.
Finally, the author's argument is admirable in that it is logical, reasoned, and easy to follow. Prabu first outlines the trends in the international world today. Then, he explains the controversy. Finally, he presents his idea as logical both in concept and in reality, using both great thinkers such as Ghandi and Kung and the United States as support. By the end of the article, readers cannot help but buy into Prabu's argument, as the concept of talking instead of fighting seems simple and understandable.
Thus, in his article, Prabu asserts that international
dialogue among cultures and religions will satisfy the contradictory issues of globalization and nationalism. He makes this argument for his audience of
academia well by presenting clear language, a using familiar and adequate arguments, and using reasoned, logical arguments.
Works Cited
Prabu, Joseph. "The Clash of Dialogue of Civilizations."
